Effects of Prerigor Pressurization on the Emulsifying Capacity of Muscle Protein

Authors

  • E. A. ELGASIM,

    1. Authors Elgasim, Kennick, and Koohmaraie are affiliated with the Clark Meat Science Laboratory, Dept. of Animal Science, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • W. H. KENNICK,

    1. Authors Elgasim, Kennick, and Koohmaraie are affiliated with the Clark Meat Science Laboratory, Dept. of Animal Science, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • A. F. ANGLEMIER,

    1. Authors Anglemier and Elkhalifa are with the Dept. of Food Science, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • E. A. ELKHALIFA,

    1. Authors Anglemier and Elkhalifa are with the Dept. of Food Science, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • M. KOOHMARAIE

    1. Authors Elgasim, Kennick, and Koohmaraie are affiliated with the Clark Meat Science Laboratory, Dept. of Animal Science, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331.
    Search for more papers by this author

  • This work was partially supported by the U.S. Dept. of Energy under grant no. DE-FG01-80CS15013.

  • Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Paper No. 5946.

ABSTRACT

The emulsifying capacities of pressure treated and control muscle homogenates, sarcoplasmic protein and myofibrillar proteins of ovine and bovine longissimus muscles were determined at 2, 6, 24 and 168 hr postmortem. The pH of the intact muscle, muscle homogenate and myofibrillar protein extract were taken at these times. Before onset of rigor mortis, the emulsifying capacity of muscle homogenate from the control samplcs was higher than the pressure treated samples. At 24 and 168 hr postmortem, the pressure treated and control samples were not significantly different (P>0.05) for emulsifying capacity. At 2 hr postmortem, the emulsifying capacity of myofibrillar protein extract from control samples was higher (P<0.05) than that from pressure treated samples; there- after, the emulsification curve for the pressure treated samples was higher than that of the control. The emulsification capacity of sarcoplasmic proteins from control muscles was slightly, but consistently, higher than that from pressure treated muscles throughout the test period. Overall, the emulsification capacity of muscle proteins was not detrimentally affected by pressure treatment.

Ancillary