Nurse practitioners in accident and emergency departments: reflections on a pilot study

Authors

  • Susan M. Read PhD RGN RHV,

    Corresponding author
    1. Nurse Research Associate, Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Steve George MB BS MSc MFPHM

    1. Senior Lecturer in Public Health Medicine, Wessex Institute of Public Health, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, England
    Search for more papers by this author

  • The paper is based on work funded by the Department of Health but the opinions expressed are those of the researchers alone.

Dr S.M. Read, Nurse Research Associate, Medical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, England.

Abstract

This paper reflects on the conduct of a pilot study which was intended to prepare the ground for a randomized, controlled clinical trial of the assessment and treatment of patients with minor injuries by nurse practitioners or senior house officers (junior doctors) in an accident and emergency department. The authors believe that such reflection makes a useful contribution to the growing debate about methodology in health services research. Following a brief literature review on nurse practitioners, the intended research design is explained. The authors then describe how observation in the chosen department led to a change in design, involving trial use of patient-kept diaries as a means of assessing outcome. Despite promising results from the third diary exercise, doubts remained about the validity of the relationship between process and outcome. The small number of patients managed by nurse practitioners compared to the greater number managed by junior doctors posed difficulties for randomization; similarities in pathways of care for patients managed by the two staff groups made it unlikely that differences in outcome could be demonstrated. These problems led to abandonment of the plan for a clinical trial at that point, but the authors believe that further exploration of the idea is desirable.

Ancillary