SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Devane D., Begley C. & Clarke M. (2004) How many do I need? Basic principles of sample size estimation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 47(3), 297302.
  • Huwiler-Muntener K., Juni P., Junker C. & Egger M. (2002) Quality of reporting randomised trials as a measure of methodological quality. Journal of the American Medical Association 287, 19871991.
  • Moher D., Pham B., Jones A., Cook D.J., Jadad A.R., Moher M., Jones A., Pham B. & Klassen T.P. (1998) Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352, 609613.
  • Moher D., Schulz K.F. & Altman D. (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 285, 19871991.
  • MRC (2004) Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials. Medical Research Council, London, UK. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/pdf-ctg.pdf. last accessed 10/03/2004.
  • Soares H.P., Daniels S., Kumar A., Clarke M., Scott C., Swann S. & Djulbegovic B. (2004) Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. British Medical Journal 328, 2224.
  • Webb C. (2004) Editor's Note: Analysis of papers published in JAN in 2002. Journal of Advanced Nursing 45, 229231.