Smoking cessation interventions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the role of the family: a systematic literature review
Version of Record online: 22 AUG 2007
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Volume 59, Issue 6, pages 559–568, September 2007
How to Cite
Luker, K. A., Chalmers, K. I., Caress, A.-L. and Salmon, M. P. (2007), Smoking cessation interventions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the role of the family: a systematic literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59: 559–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04379.x
- Issue online: 22 AUG 2007
- Version of Record online: 22 AUG 2007
- Accepted for publication 22 May 2007
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
- family care;
- public health nursing;
- respiratory nursing;
- smoking cessation;
- systematic literature review
Title. Smoking cessation interventions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the role of the family: a systematic literature review
Aim. This paper is a report of a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of family-focused smoking cessation interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and to determine what data on families are documented in studies of smoking cessation interventions.
Background. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major public health problem and cigarette smoking is the most important factor contributing to its development and progression. However, smoking cessation rates are low and relapse is common. The role of families in smoking cessation efforts has received little attention.
Methods. All studies were included in the review that (i) addressed an evaluation of a psycho-social/educational smoking cessation intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (ii) addressed some information on the family (i.e. living arrangements, marital status, smoking history of family members, support for quitting) and/or included the family as part of the intervention and (iii) were published between 1990 and 2006. Electronic data sources, existing systematic reviews of smoking cessation interventions and the grey literature were reviewed.
Results. Seven studies were included. Six studies (11 papers) included data on marital status, smoking status of household members, support for quitting smoking and related variables. In two of the studies, the variable on the family was used to analyse smoking cessation outcomes. One additional study met the inclusion criterion of an evaluation of a smoking cessation intervention, which also included a family focus in the intervention.
Conclusion. No conclusions about the effectiveness of a family-focused smoking cessation intervention could be drawn from this review. Further research is needed to determine if a more family-focused intervention, in conjunction with pharmacological and counselling approaches, would lead to improved smoking cessation outcomes.