Get access

Measuring community nurses’ job satisfaction: literature review

Authors

  • Ralf Caers,

    1. Ralf Caers PhD Assistant Professor Centre for Corporate Sustainability, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Cindy Du Bois,

    1. Cindy Du Bois PhD Postdoctoral Researcher Department of Micro-economics for the Profit and Nonprofit Sectors, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Marc Jegers,

    1. Marc Jegers PhD Professor Department of Micro-economics for the Profit and Nonprofit Sectors, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sara De Gieter,

    1. Sara De Gieter Mpsyc Research Assistant and PhD Student Department of Work, Organisational & Economic Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Rein De Cooman,

    1. Rein De Cooman MPsyc and PhD Student Research Assistant Department of Work, Organisational & Economic Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Roland Pepermans

    1. Roland Pepermans PhD Professor Department of Work, Organisational & Economic Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author

R. Caers: e-mail: ralf.caers@ehsal.be

Abstract

Title. Measuring community nurses’ job satisfaction: literature review

Aim.  This paper is a report of a review of the literature on community nurses’ job satisfaction, including research using different scales and settings, what is known to date and directions for future research.

Background.  Job satisfaction is one of the strongest predictors of intent to stay and retention of nurses. An adequate understanding of the sources of job satisfaction and their importance can aid policymakers in the community nursing setting to cope with the growing demand for its services.

Data sources.  A database of papers was established using ISI Web of Knowledge. Cited references were used to expand the database. Journals adding to the database were scanned for related research. This technique was repeated until no additional papers could be found.

Findings.  Twelve job satisfaction scales were found, with striking differences in methodology, settings and sample characteristics of the studies concerned. A wide variety of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction sources is identified, but little is known on their relative importance. The Measure of Job Satisfaction and the Home Healthcare Nurses’ Job Satisfaction Scale prove highly reliable and applicable.

Conclusion. Findings on the level and sources of community nurses’ job satisfaction are ambiguous. Of all the scales reviewed, the Home Healthcare Nurses’ Job Satisfaction Scale seems most promising for use in future research, based on its strong psychometric properties and its specificity for the community nursing setting.

Ancillary