SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Fisher R.A. (1935) Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
  • Freshwater D. & Rolfe G. (2004) Deconstructing Evidence-Based Practice. Routledge, London.
  • Lehmann E.L. (1993) The Fisher, Neyman–Pearson theories of testing hypotheses: one theory or two? Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 12421249.
  • Lehmann E.L. (1995) Neyman’s statistical philosophy. Probability and Mathematical Statistics 15, 2936.
  • Mayo D.G. & Spanos A. (2006) Severe testing as a basic concept in a Neyman–Pearson philosophy of induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57, 323357.
  • Neyman J. & Pearson E.S. (1966) Joint Statistical Papers. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
  • Paley J., Cheyne H., Dalgleish L., Duncan E. & Niven C. (2007) Nursing’s ways of knowing and dual process theories of cognition. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60, 692701.
  • Rolfe G. (2008) In response to Paley J, Cheyne H, Dalgleish L, Duncan E & Niven C (2007) Nursing’s ways of knowing and dual process theories of cognition. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62(2), 268269.