Get access

Tablet-splitting: a common yet not so innocent practice

Authors

  • Charlotte Verrue,

    1. Charlotte Verrue PharmD PhD Post-doctoral Researcher Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Els Mehuys,

    1. Els Mehuys PharmD PhD Post-doctoral Researcher Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Koen Boussery,

    1. Koen Boussery PharmD PhD Post-doctoral Researcher Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jean-Paul Remon,

    1. Jean-Paul Remon PharmD PhD Professor of Pharmaceutical Technology Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mirko Petrovic

    1. Mirko Petrovic MD PhD Professor of Geriatrics Department of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author

C. Verrue: e-mail: charlotte.verrue@ugent.be

Abstract

verrue c., mehuys e., boussery k., remon j.-p. & petrovic m. (2010) Tablet-splitting: a common yet not so innocent practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing67(1), 26–32.

Abstract

Aim.  This paper is a report of a study conducted to quantify (i) the mean deviation from theoretical weight and (ii) the mean weight loss, after tablet-splitting with three different, commonly used splitting methods.

Background.  Tablet-splitting is a widespread practice among all sectors of health care for different reasons: it increases dose flexibility, makes tablet parts easier to swallow and allows cost savings for both patients and healthcare providers. However, the tablet parts obtained are often not equal in size, and a substantial amount of tablet can be lost during splitting.

Method.  Five volunteers were asked to mimic the situation in nursing homes and to split eight tablets of different sizes and shapes using three different routine methods: (i) with a splitting device (Pilomat®), (ii) with scissors for unscored tablets or manual splitting for scored tablets and (iii) with a kitchen knife. Before and after splitting, tablets and tablet parts were weighed using an analytical balance. The data were collected in 2007.

Results.  For all tablets, method 1 gave a statistically significantly lower mean deviation from theoretical weight. The difference between method 2 and method 3 was not statistically significant. When pooling the different products, method 1 also induced significantly less weight loss than the two other methods.

Conclusion.  Large dose deviations or weight losses can occur while splitting tablets. This could have serious clinical consequences for medications with a narrow therapeutic-toxic range. On the basis of the results in this report, we recommend use of a splitting device when splitting cannot be avoided.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary