Home care nurses’ decisions about the need for and amount of service at the end of life
Version of Record online: 25 OCT 2010
© 2010 The Authors. Journal of Advanced Nursing © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Volume 67, Issue 2, pages 276–286, February 2011
How to Cite
Stajduhar, K. I., Funk, L., Roberts, D., McLeod, B., Cloutier-Fisher, D., Wilkinson, C. and Purkis, M. E. (2011), Home care nurses’ decisions about the need for and amount of service at the end of life. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67: 276–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05491.x
- Issue online: 14 JAN 2011
- Version of Record online: 25 OCT 2010
- Accepted for publication 10 September 2010
- access to care;
- end of life care;
- home care;
- home care nurses;
- palliative care
stajduhar k.i., funk l., roberts d., mcleod b., cloutier-fisher d., wilkinson c. & purkis m.e. (2011) Home care nurses’ decisions about the need for and amount of service at the end of life. Journal of Advanced Nursing 67(2), 276–286.
Aims. We explore home care nurse decision-making about the need for and amount of service by clients and families at the end of life. We identify factors nurses refer to when describing these decisions, situated within contextual features of nursing practice.
Background. Home care nurses are often responsible for decisions which have an impact on the access of clients and families to services at the end of life. Understanding how these decisions, are made, factors that are considered, and contextual influences is critical for improving access and enhancing care.
Methods. Qualitative data were collected between 2006 and 2008 from two samples of home care nurses: the first group (n = 29) recorded narrative descriptions of decisions made during visits to families. The second group (n = 27) completed in-person interviews focusing on access to care and their interactions with clients and families. Data were analysed with thematic coding and constant comparison.
Findings. Participants described assessing client and family needs and capacity. These assessments, at times integrated with considerations about relationships with clients and families, inform predictive judgements about future visits; these judgments are integrated with workload and home health resource considerations. In describing decisions, participants referred to concepts such as expertise, practice ideals and approaches to care.
Conclusion. Findings highlight the role of considerations of family caregiver capacity, the influence of relationships and the importance of the context of practice, as part of a complete understanding of the complexity of access to care at the end of life.