SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Joyce L. Marshall, Helen Spiby, Felicia McCormick, Evaluating the ‘Focus on Normal Birth and Reducing Caesarean section Rates Rapid Improvement Programme’: A mixed method study in England, Midwifery, 2015, 31, 2, 332

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Jiangfeng Ye, Ana Pilar Betrán, Miguel Guerrero Vela, Joäo Paulo Souza, Jun Zhang, Searching for the Optimal Rate of Medically Necessary Cesarean Delivery, Birth, 2014, 41, 3
  3. 3
    Hannah G. Dahlen, Caroline S.E. Homer, ‘Motherbirth or childbirth’? A prospective analysis of vaginal birth after caesarean blogs, Midwifery, 2013, 29, 2, 167

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Melissa G. Rosenstein, Miriam Kuppermann, Steven E. Gregorich, Erika K. Cottrell, Aaron B. Caughey, Yvonne W. Cheng, Association Between Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery and Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013, 122, 5, 1010

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Lawrence M. Leeman, Melissa Beagle, Eve Espey, Tony Ogburn, Betty Skipper, Diminishing Availability of Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in New Mexico Hospitals, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013, 122, 2, PART 1, 242

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Yun Mi Kim, Myung-Hee Kim, Kyohyun Kim, Maternal Factors Affecting Delivery Mode of the Previous Cesarean Delivery Mothers, Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 2011, 17, 4, 359

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Dell Horey, Michelle Kealy, Mary-Ann Davey, Rhonda Small, Caroline A Crowther, Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean, The Cochrane Library,
  8. 8
    Dell Horey, Mary-Ann Davey, Rhonda Small, Michelle Kealy, Caroline A Crowther, Interventions for supporting women with decisions about mode of birth in a pregnancy after caesarean birth, The Cochrane Library,