Developing a multi-systemic fall prevention model, incorporating the physical environment, the care process and technology: a systematic review

Authors

  • Young-Seon Choi,

    1. Young-Seon Choi March PhD Candidate College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Erin Lawler,

    1. Erin Lawler MS Human Factors Engineer Department of Defense Patient Safety Analysis Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Clayton A. Boenecke,

    1. Clayton A. Boenecke MHA Chief, Capital Planning Branch Portfolio Planning and Management Division, TRICARE Management Activity, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Edward R. Ponatoski,

    1. Edward R. Ponatoski MHA Senior Partner Martin-Blanck & Associates, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Craig M. Zimring

    1. Craig M. Zimring PhD Professor College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Y. Choi: e-mail: ys.choi@gatech.edu

Abstract

choi y., lawler e., boenecke c.a., ponatoski e.r. & zimring c.m. (2011) Developing a multi-systemic fall prevention model, incorporating the physical environment, the care process, and technology: a systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing67(12), 2501–2524.

Abstract

Aims.  This paper reports a review that assessed the effectiveness and characteristics of fall prevention interventions implemented in hospitals. A multi-systemic fall prevention model that establishes a practical framework was developed from the evidence.

Background.  Falls occur through complex interactions between patient-related and environmental risk factors, suggesting a need for multifaceted fall prevention approaches that address both factors.

Data sources.  We searched Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo and the Web of Science databases for references published between January 1990 and June 2009 and scrutinized secondary references from acquired papers.

Review methods.  Due to the heterogeneity of interventions and populations, we conducted a quantitative systematic review without a meta-analysis and used a narrative summary to report findings.

Results.  From the review, three distinct characteristics of fall prevention interventions emerged: (1) the physical environment, (2) the care process and culture and (3) technology. While clinically significant evidence shows the efficacy of environment-related interventions in reducing falls and fall-related injuries, the literature identified few hospitals that had introduced environment-related interventions in their multifaceted fall intervention strategies.

Conclusion.  Using the multi-systemic fall prevention model, hospitals should promote a practical strategy that benefits from the collective effects of the physical environment, the care process and culture and technology to prevent falls and fall-related injuries. By doing so, they can more effectively address the various risk factors for falling and therefore, prevent falls. Studies that test the proposed model need to be conducted to establish the efficacy of the model in practice.

Ancillary