SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • burden;
  • caregivers;
  • caregiving;
  • coping;
  • nursing;
  • older people;
  • quantitative systematic review

del-pino-casado r., frías-osuna a., palomino-moral p.a. & pancorbo-hidalgo p.l. (2011) Coping and subjective burden in caregivers of older relatives: a quantitative systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing67(11), 2311–2322.

Abstract

Aim.  This article is a report on a review of the effect of coping strategies on subjective burden in informal caregivers of older adults.

Background.  Informal care has negative effects on caregivers’ health, and subjective burden is one of these. It has been linked with other effects (e.g. anxiety and depression). Thus, greater prevention of subjective burden will mean increased prevention of these effects. To achieve this, identification of factors related to subjective burden is essential.

Data sources.  Electronic databases and manual searches of scientific journals.

Review methods.  A quantitative systematic review was conducted including: (a) original studies (b) that related caregiver subjective burden to coping strategies compatible with the classifications of Lazarus & Folkman or Moos et al. (c) in informal caregivers of older relatives. The searches ranged from the first year included in each database until January 2010. After quality appraisal, ten studies were included; these, care-recipients living at home and having cognitive impairment.

Results.  Four coping categories have been related to subjective burden: problem-focused, emotion-focused, approach and avoidance. Interesting results were only found for avoidance coping (positive association). In other categories, results were heterogeneous (problem-focused and approach) or we found few valid studies (emotion-focused).

Conclusion.  We found some evidence for a positive association between avoidance coping and subjective burden in home caregivers of older relatives with cognitive impairment. It is probable that avoidance coping either mediates or moderates the relationship between subjective burden and its outcomes, or that avoidance coping precedes subjective burden, which in turn leads to the coping outcomes. In both situations, avoidance coping is an ineffective coping.