You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Successional patterns on pen shell communities at local and regional scales
Article first published online: 6 JAN 2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00778.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Munguia, P. (2004), Successional patterns on pen shell communities at local and regional scales. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73: 64–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00778.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 6 JAN 2004
- Article first published online: 6 JAN 2004
- Received 17 January 2003; revision received 27 June 2003
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Atrina rigida;
- benthic community;
- colonization;
- diversity;
- spatial scale
Summary
- 1I present a successional study of marine organisms on pen shells (Atrina rigida) at different regions of St Joe Bay, Florida. By incorporating measures of relative abundance and assembly time I show how the relationship between local and regional diversity develops through different successional stages.
- 2The results showed that, with time, motile species richness increases significantly while evenness indices remain high and constant. Sessile species, on the other hand, increased in both species richness and evenness through time.
- 3For the motile species, regions seem to remain different while local saturation is observed. These results suggest that this group is under species-sorting: species are mobile enough that recruits and adult dispersal within a region maintain differences among regions, while local communities are saturated.
- 4For the sessile species, the local–regional relationship was unsaturated at all sampling dates with both untransformed and rarefied data. Regions are initially similar in community structure, then differ through time to become similar again at the last sampling date. This may reflect a priority effect: propagules that arrive at a shell may initially exert influence on the species composition on a shell, so that at intermediate sampling times regions differ in community structure. However, at the last sampling there were no differences detected among regions, suggesting that dispersal distances might be larger for this group of species.
- 5These results suggest the following. (1) The degree of species saturation will depend on the successional stage of a community. (2) Incorporating species abundances (i.e. through rarefaction or other techniques) demonstrates the role of species commonness or rarity in determining patterns of community diversity at different scales. (3) Depending on the group of species studied, the size of the region will vary and will influence the local–regional dynamics: the perceived region for sessile species may be larger than for motile species.

1365-2656/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=4f0919eca9042f833d018453e8f48b1e3e3123ec)
1365-2656/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=92164cf20561f2dc5785bff8431569e5b40f87aa)
