Present address: Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division, 100-3115 12 St. NE, Calgary, AB, Canada, T2E 7J2.
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Phenotypic effects on survival of neonatal northern watersnakes Nerodia sipedon
Article first published online: 19 JAN 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00919.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
KISSNER, K. J. and WEATHERHEAD, P. J. (2005), Phenotypic effects on survival of neonatal northern watersnakes Nerodia sipedon. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74: 259–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00919.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 JAN 2005
- Article first published online: 19 JAN 2005
- Received 27 February 2004; accepted 30 July 2004
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- neonate;
- Nerodia sipedon;
- optimal offspring size;
- phenotypes;
- survival
Summary
- 1Understanding the trade-off females make between offspring size and number requires knowing how neonatal size, and traits associated with size, affect survival.
- 2We studied neonatal survival in the northern watersnake Nerodia sipedon in outdoor enclosures with artificial hibernation sites.
- 3From a total of 950 neonates from 77 litters collected over 3 years, we found a survival rate of 65% between birth and hibernation and 47% during hibernation. Estimated survival from birth to the end of hibernation was 31%, comparable with indirect estimates for free-living watersnakes.
- 4Consistent with the ‘bigger is better’ hypothesis, larger neonates and neonates heavier relative to their body length were more likely to survive both the pre-hibernation and hibernation periods.
- 5Survival in the pre-hibernation period also decreased with the duration of that period and varied among years.
- 6Survival during hibernation was higher in warmer winters. Mass change prior to hibernation did not affect survival during hibernation.
- 7These results suggest that an optimal reproductive strategy should exist for female watersnakes, producing a ‘consensus’ among females on the optimal size for offspring. This expectation stands in stark contrast to the pronounced variation in offspring size observed both within and among litters.

1365-2656/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=4f0919eca9042f833d018453e8f48b1e3e3123ec)
1365-2656/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=92164cf20561f2dc5785bff8431569e5b40f87aa)
