You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
The ecology of motherhood: the structuring of lactation costs by chacma baboons
Article first published online: 5 JUN 2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01105.x
© 2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2006 British Ecological Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
BARRETT, L., HALLIDAY, J. and HENZI, S. P. (2006), The ecology of motherhood: the structuring of lactation costs by chacma baboons. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75: 875–886. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01105.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 JUN 2006
- Article first published online: 5 JUN 2006
- Received 16 October 2005; accepted 6 March 2006
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- lactation;
- Papio hamadryas ursinus;
- seasonality;
- time budget;
- vigilance
Summary
- 1Data from a long-term study of Papio hamadryas ursinus (L.) in the De Hoop Nature Reserve, Western Cape, South Africa, were used to test the assumptions and predictions of Altmann's model of maternal time budgets.
- 2Female baboons’ feeding time was below model predictions, and there was no evidence for a consistent increase in feeding time with infant age. In addition, female feeding time was not significantly higher than observed baseline feeding times for nonlactating females.
- 3Female baboons reduced activity levels in the first few months post-partum, as reflected in significant increases in resting time, and there was some indication that females lost body mass over the course of lactation. When feeding demand was high, females sacrificed social time, and conserved resting time.
- 4Females increased vigilance levels during the first 4 months of infant life and were more vigilant overall during lactation than when nonlactating. There was a negative relationship between feeding time and vigilance, but a positive relationship between resting time and vigilance.
- 5Female baboons at De Hoop appear to cope with the energetic costs of lactation by reducing activity levels, although this cannot compensate completely for increased energetic costs. This may not be so much an ‘energy-sparing’ strategy as a response to threats presented by infanticidal males in this population. Females therefore trade-off feeding time against vigilance.

1365-2656/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=4f0919eca9042f833d018453e8f48b1e3e3123ec)
1365-2656/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=92164cf20561f2dc5785bff8431569e5b40f87aa)
