Experimental and model analyses of the effects of competition on individual size variation in wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles



    1. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 and Great Lakes Environmental, Research Laboratory (NOAA), 2205 Commonwealth Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA; and
    Search for more papers by this author

    1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, 1101 E. 57th Street, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Scott Peacor, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (NOAA), 2205 Commonwealth Blvd, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA. E-mail: peacor@msu.edu


  • 1Size variation is a ubiquitous feature of animal populations and is predicted to strongly influence species abundance and dynamics; however, the factors that determine size variation are not well understood.
  • 2In a mesocosm experiment, we found that the relationship between mean and variation in wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpole size is qualitatively different at different levels of competition created by manipulating resource supply rates or tadpole density. At low competition, relative size variation (as measured by the coefficient of variation) decreased as a function of mean size, while at high competition, relative size variation increased. Therefore, increased competition magnified differences in individual performance as measured by growth rate.
  • 3A model was developed to estimate the contribution of size-dependent factors (i.e. based on size alone) and size-independent factors (i.e. resulting from persistent inherent phenotypic differences other than size that affect growth) on the empirical patterns.
  • 4Model analysis of the low competition treatment indicated that size-dependent factors alone can describe the relationship between mean size and size variation. To fit the data, the size scaling exponent that describes the dependence of growth rate on size was determined. The estimated value, 0·83, is in the range of that derived from physiological studies.
  • 5At high competition, the model analysis indicated that individual differences in foraging ability, either size-based or due to inherent phenotypic differences (size-independent factors), were much more pronounced than at low competition. The model was used to quantify the changes in size-dependent or size-independent factors that underlie the effect of competition on size-variation. In contrast to results at low competition, parameters derived from physiological studies could not be used to describe the observed relationships.
  • 6Our experimental and model results elucidate the role of size-dependent and size-independent factors in the development of size variation, and highlight and quantify the context dependence of individual (intrapopulation) differences in competitive abilities.