SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arita, H.T., Robinson, J.G. & Redford, K.H. (1990) Rarity in Neotropical forest mammals and its ecological correlates. Conservation Biology, 4, 181192.
  • Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J., Greenwood, J.J.D. & Gregory, R.D. (1998) The anatomy of the interspecific abundance-range size relationship for the British avifauna. II. Temporal dynamics. Ecology Letters, 1, 4755.
  • Blackburn, T.M., Gaston, K.J., Quinn, R.M., Arnold, H. & Gregory, R.D. (1997) Of mice and wrens: the relation between abundance and geographic range size in British mammals and birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B 352, 419427.
  • Bock, C.E. (1987) Distribution-abundance relationships of some Arizona landbirds: a matter of scale? Ecology, 68, 124129.
  • Brown, J.H. (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist, 124, 255279.
  • Brown, J.H., Stevens, G.C. & Kaufman, D.W. (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 597623.
  • Ellingsen, K.E. (2001) Biodiversity of a continental shelf soft-sediment macrobenthos community. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 218, 115.
  • Freckleton, R.P., Gill, J.A., Noble, D. & Watkinson, A.R. (2005) Large-scale population dynamics, abundance-occupancy relationships and the scaling from local to regional population size. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74, 353364.
  • Freckleton, R.P., Noble, D. & Webb, T.J. (2006) Distributions of habitat suitability and the abundance-occupancy relationship. American Naturalist, 167, 260275.
  • Gaston, K.J. (1991) How large is a species’ geographic range? Oikos, 61, 434437.
  • Gaston, K.J. (1994) Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Gaston, K.J. (1996) The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance–distribution relationship. Oikos, 76, 211220.
  • Gaston, K.J. (1999) Implications of interspecific and intraspecific abundance-occupancy relationships. Oikos, 86, 195207.
  • Gaston, K.J. (2003) The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Gaston, K.J. (2006) Biodiversity and extinction: Macroecological patterns and people. Progress in Physical Geography, 30, 258269.
  • Gaston, K.J. & Blackburn, T.M. (1996a) Global scale macroecology: interactions between population size, geographic range size and body size in the Anseriformes. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65, 701714.
  • Gaston, K.J. & Blackburn, T.M. (1996b) Range size-body size relationships: evidence of scale dependence. Oikos, 75, 479485.
  • Gaston, K.J. & Blackburn, T.M. (2000) Pattern and Process in Macroecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M., Greenwood, J.J.D., Gregory, R.D., Quinn, R.M. & Lawton, J.H. (2000) Abundance-occupancy relationships. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37 (s1), 3959.
  • Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M. & Lawton, J.H. (1997a) Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 579601.
  • Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M. & Gregory, R.D. (1997b) Abundance-range size relationships of breeding and wintering birds in Britain: a comparative analysis. Ecography, 20, 569579.
  • Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M. & Lawton, J.H. (1998) Aggregation and the interspecific abundance-occupancy relationship. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 995999.
  • Gonzalez, A., Lawton, J.H., Gilbert, F.S., Blackburn, T.M. & Evans-Freke, I. (1998) Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem. Science, 281, 20452047.
  • Hanski, I. (1982a) Communities of bumblebees: testing the core-satellite species hypothesis. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 19, 6573.
  • Hanski, I. (1982b) Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos, 38, 210221.
  • Hanski, I., Kouki, J. & Halkka, A. (1993) Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives (eds R.E.Ricklefs & D.Schluter), pp. 108116. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Hartley, S. (1998) A positive relationship between local abundance and regional occupancy is almost inevitable (but not all positive relationships are the same). Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 992994.
  • Hedges, L.V. & Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  • Holt, A.R. & Gaston, K.J. (2003) Interspecific abundance-occupancy relationships of British mammals and birds: is it possible to explain the residual variation? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 3746.
  • Holt, A.R., Gaston, K.J. & He, F. (2002) Occupancy-abundance relationships and spatial distribution: a review. Basic and Applied Ecology, 3, 113.
  • Kemp, W.P., Harvey, S.J. & O’Neill, K.M. (1990) Patterns of vegetation and grasshopper community composition. Oecologia, 83, 299308.
  • Komonen, A. (2003) Distribution and abundance of insect fungivores in the fruiting bodies of Fomitopsis pinicola. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 40, 495504.
  • Kouki, J. & Häyrinen, U. (1991) On the relationship between distribution and abundance in birds breeding on Finnish mires: the effect of habitat specialization. Ornis Fennica, 68, 170177.
  • Kraemer, H.C. (1983) Theory of estimation and testing of effect sizes: Use in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 93101.
  • Krasnov, B.R., Poulin, R., Shenbrot, G.I., Mouillot, D. & Khokhlova, I.S. (2004) Ectoparasitic ‘Jacks-of-all-trades’: relationship between abundance and host specificity in fleas (Siphonaptera) parasitic on small mammals. American Naturalist, 164, 506516.
  • Lawton, J.H. (2000) Community Ecology in a Changing World. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.
  • Marchetti, M.P., Light, T., Feliciano, J., Armstrong, T., Hogan, Z., Viers, J. & Moyle, P.B. (2001) Homogenization of California's fish fauna through abiotic change. Biotic Homogenization (eds J.L.Lockwood & M.L.McKinney), pp. 259278. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
  • Møller, A.P. & Jennions, M.D. (2002) How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists? Oecologia, 132, 492500.
  • Murray, B.R., Fonseca, C.R. & Westoby, M. (1998) The macroecology of Australian frogs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 567579.
  • Nee, S., Gregory, R.D. & May, R.M. (1991) Core and satellite species: theory and artefacts. Oikos, 62, 8387.
  • Osenberg, C.W., Sarnelle, O., Cooper, S.D. & Holt, R.D. (1999) Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models. Ecology, 80, 11051117.
  • Owen, J. & Gilbert, F.S. (1989) On the abundance of hoverflies (Syrphidae). Oikos, 55, 183193.
  • Van Rensburg, B.J., McGeoch, M.A., Matthews, W., Chown, S.L. & Van Jaarsveld, A.S. (2000) Testing generalities in the shape of patch occupancy frequency distributions. Ecology, 81, 31633177.
  • Rosenberg, M.S. (2005) The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution, 59, 464468.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1994) Parametric measures of effect size. The Handbook of Research Synthesis (eds H.Cooper & L.V.Hedges), pp. 231244. Russel Sage Foundation, New York.
  • Scheffé, H. (1953) A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 40, 87103.
  • Scheffé, H. (1959) The Analysis of Variance. Wiley, New York.
  • Simková, A., Kadlec, D., Gelnar, M. & Morand, S. (2002) Abundance-prevalence relationship of gill congeneric ectoparasites: testing the core satellite hypothesis and ecological specialisation. Parasitology Research, 88, 682686.
  • Söderström, L. (1989) Regional distribution patterns of bryophyte species on spruce logs in Northern Sweden. Bryologist, 92, 349355.
  • Soininen, J. & Heino, J. (2005) Relationships between local population persistence, local abundance and regional occupancy of species: distribution patterns of diatoms in boreal streams. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 19711978.
  • Spitzer, K. & Lepš, J. (1988) Determinants of temporal variation in moth abundance. Oikos, 53, 3136.
  • Sutton, J.B. (1990) Values of the Index of Determination at the 5% significance level. Statistician, 39, 461463.
  • Tales, E., Keith, P. & Oberdorff, T. (2004) Density-range size relationships in French riverine fishes. Oecologia, 138, 360370.
  • Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. (1997) Interspecific abundance-occupancy relationships: a test of mechanisms using microcosms. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 730742.
  • Wright, D.H. (1991) Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. Journal of Biogeography, 18, 463466.