Costs of coexistence along a gradient of competitor densities: an experiment with arvicoline rodents

Authors

  • JANA A. ECCARD,

    1. Department of Biological and Environmental Science and Konnevesi Research Station, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35, FIN-40014 University of Jyväskylä (Finland);
    2. Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Bielefeld, PO Box 10 01 31, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • HANNU YLÖNEN

    1. Department of Biological and Environmental Science and Konnevesi Research Station, University of Jyväskylä, PO Box 35, FIN-40014 University of Jyväskylä (Finland);
    Search for more papers by this author

Jana Anja Eccard, Department of Animal Behaviour, University of Bielefeld, PO Box 10 01 31, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany. Tel.: +49 521 106 2723. Fax: +49 521 106 2998. E-mail: jana.eccard@uni-bielefeld.de

Summary

  • 1Costs of coexistence for species with indirect resource competition usually increase monotonically with competitor numbers. Very little is known though about the shape of the cost function for species with direct interference competition.
  • 2Here we report the results of an experiment with two vole species in artificial coexistence in large enclosures, where density of the dominant competitor species (Microtus agrestis) was manipulated. Experimental populations of the subordinate vole species (Clethrionomys glareolus) were composed of same aged individuals to study distribution of costs of coexistence with a dominant species within an age-cohort.
  • 3Survival and space use decreased gradually with increasing field vole numbers. Thus, responses to interference competition in our system appeared to be similar as expected from resource competition. The total number of breeders was stable. Reproductive characteristics such as the timing of breeding, and the litter size were not affected. In the single species enclosures a proportion of surviving individuals were not able to establish a breeding territory against stronger conspecifics. Under competition with heterospecifics such nonbreeders suffered high mortality, whereas the breeders survived.
  • 4Combined interference of dominant conspecifics and heterospecifics probably increased the frequency of aggressive interactions, social stress and mortality for the weaker individuals within a homogeneous age cohort of the subordinate competitor population.
  • 5Our results suggest, that in open systems where bank voles are outcompeted over the breeding season by faster reproducing field voles, animals able to establish a territory may be able to withstand competitor pressure, while nonbreeding bank vole individuals are forced to emigrate to suboptimal forest habitats.

Ancillary