Prior knowledge about spatial pattern affects patch assessment rather than movement between patches in tactile-feeding mallard

Authors

  • RAYMOND H. G. KLAASSEN,

    1. Department of Plant–Animal Interactions, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NIOO-KNAW), PO Box 1299, NL-3600 BG Maarssen, the Netherlands;
    Search for more papers by this author
  • BART A. NOLET,

    1. Department of Plant–Animal Interactions, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NIOO-KNAW), PO Box 1299, NL-3600 BG Maarssen, the Netherlands;
    Search for more papers by this author
  • CASPER H. A. VAN LEEUWEN

    1. Department of Plant–Animal Interactions, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NIOO-KNAW), PO Box 1299, NL-3600 BG Maarssen, the Netherlands;
    2. Landscape Ecology group, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, PO Box 800·84, NL-3508 TB, the Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

R.H.G. Klaassen, Department of Plant–Animal Interactions, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NIOO-KNAW), PO Box 1299, NL-3600 BG Maarssen, the Netherlands. E-mail: r.klaassen@nioo.knaw.nl

Summary

  • 1Heterogeneity in food abundance allows a forager to concentrate foraging effort in patches that are rich in food. This might be problematic when food is cryptic, as the content of patches is unknown prior to foraging. In such case knowledge about the spatial pattern in the distribution of food might be beneficial as this enables a forager to estimate the content of surrounding patches. A forager can benefit from this pre-harvest information about the food distribution by regulating time in patches and/or movement between patches.
  • 2We conducted an experiment with mallard Anas platyrhynchos foraging in environments with random, regular, and clumped spatial configurations of full and empty patches. An assessment model was used to predict the time in patches for different spatial distributions, in which a mallard is predicted to remain in a patch until its potential intake rate drops to the average intake rate that can be achieved in the environment. A movement model was used to predict lengths of interpatch movements for different spatial distributions, in which a mallard is predicted to travel to the patch where it expects the highest intake rate.
  • 3Consistent with predictions, in the clumped distribution mallard spent less time in an empty patch when the previously visited neighbouring patch had been empty than when it had been full. This effect was not observed for the random distribution. This shows that mallard use pre-harvest information on spatial pattern to improve patch assessment. Patch assessment could not be evaluated for the regular distribution.
  • 4Movements that started in an empty patch were longer than movements that started in a full patch. Contrary to model predictions this effect was observed for all spatial distributions, rather than for the clumped distribution only. In this experiment mallard did not regulate movement in relation to pattern.
  • 5An explanation for the result that pre-harvest information on spatial pattern affected patch assessment rather than movement is that mallard move to the nearest patch where the expected intake rate is higher than the critical value, rather than to the patch where the highest intake rate is expected.

Ancillary