SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Allainé, D. (2004) Sex ratio variation in the cooperatively breeding alpine marmot Marmota marmota. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 9971002.
  • Allainé, D. & Theuriau, F. (2004) Is there an optimal number of helpers in alpine marmot family groups? Behavioral Ecology, 15, 916924.
  • Allainé, D., Brondex, F., Graziani, L., Coulon, J. & Till Bottraud, I. (2000) Male-biased sex ratio in litters of alpine marmots supports the helper repayment hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 507514.
  • Arnold, W. (1990) The evolution of marmot sociality. II. Costs and benefits of joint hibernation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 239246.
  • Arnold, W. (1993) Social evolution in marmots and the adaptive value of joint hibernation. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 86, 7993.
  • Arnold, W. & Dittami, J. (1997) Reproductive suppression in male alpine marmots. Animal Behaviour, 53, 5366.
  • Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. (1992) Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences. Academic Press, London.
  • Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, London.
  • Blomqvist, D., Andersson, M., Kupper, C., Cuthill, I., Kis, J., Lanctot, R., Sandercock, B., Szekely, T., Wallander, J. & Kempenaers, B. (2002) Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds. Nature, 419, 613615.
  • Brooker, M.G., Rowley, I., Adams, M. & Baverstock, P.R. (1990) Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 191199.
  • Burke, T., Davies, N., Bruford, N. & Hatchwell, B. (1989) Parental care and mating behaviour of polyandrous dunnocks Prunella modularis related to paternity by DNA fingerprinting. Nature, 338, 249251.
  • Burnham, K. & Anderson, D. (2000) Model Selection and Inference. Springer, Berlin.
  • Burnham, K., Anderson, D., White, G., Brownie, C. & Pollock, K. (1987) Design and Analysis Methods for Fish Survival Experiments Based on Release-Recapture. American Fisheries Society Monograph 5.
  • Burnham, K.P., White, G.C. & Anderson, D.R. (1995) Model selection strategy in the analysis of capture–recapture data. Biometrics, 51, 888898.
  • Carlin, J.B., Wolfe, R., Brown, C.H. & Gelman, A. (2001) A case study on the choice, interpretation and checking of multilevel models for longitudinal binary outcomes. Biostatistics, 2, 397416.
  • Charmantier, A., Blondel, J., Perret, P. & Lambrechts, M. (2004) Do extra-pair paternities provide genetic benefits for female blue tits Parus caeruleus? Journal of Avian Biology, 35, 524532.
  • Choquet, R., Reboulet, A., Pradel, R., Gimenez, O. & Lebreton, J.-D. (2004) M-SURGE: new software specifically designed for multistate capture–recapture models. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 207215.
  • Choquet, R., Reboulet, A.M., Lebreton, J.-D., Gimenez, O. & Pradel, R. (2005) U-CARE 2·2 User's Manual. CEFE, Montpellier, France.
  • Cohas, A., Yoccoz, N., Da Silva, A., Goossens, B. & Allainé, D. (2006) Extra-pair paternity in the monogamous alpine marmot (Marmota marmota): the roles of social setting and female mate choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 597605.
  • Cohas, A., Yoccoz, N.G. & Allainé, D. (2007) Extra-pair paternity in alpine marmots, Marmota marmota: genetic quality and genetic diversity effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 10811092.
  • Colwell, M. & Oring, L. (1989) Extra-pair paternity in the spotted sandpiper: a female mate acquisition tactic. Animal Behaviour, 38, 675684.
  • Cunningham, E. & Russell, A. (2001) Differential allocation and ‘good genes’– Comment from Cunningham and Russell. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 21.
  • Da Silva, A., Luikart, G., Allainé, D., Gautier, P., Taberlet, P. & Pompanon, F. (2003) Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in European alpine marmots (Marmota marmota). Molecular Ecology Notes, 3, 189190.
  • Da Silva, A., Luikart, G., Yoccoz, N., Cohas, A. & Allainé, D. (2006) Genetic diversity-fitness correlation revealed by microsatellite analyses in European alpine marmots (Marmota marmota). Conservation Genetics, 3, 371382.
  • Diggle, P.J., Heagerty, P.J., Liang, K.Y. & Zeger, S.L. (2002) Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Dunn, P., Robertson, R., Michaud-Freeman, D. & Boag, P. (1994) Extra-pair paternity in tree swallows: why do females mate with more than one male? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 273281.
  • Eimes, J., Parker, P., Brown, J. & Brown, E. (2005) Extrapair fertilization and genetic similarity of social mates in the Mexican jay. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 456460.
  • Farand, E., Allainé, D. & Coulon, J. (2002) Variation in survival rates for the alpine marmot (Marmota marmota): effects of sex, age, year, and climatic factors. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80, 342349.
  • Forstmeier, W., Kempenaers, B., Meyer, A. & Leisler, B. (2002) A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. Biological Sciences, 269, 14791485.
  • Foerster, K., Delhey, K., Johnsen, A., Lifjeld, J. & Kempenaers, B. (2003) Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature, 425, 714717.
  • Freeman-Callant, C., Meguerdichian, M., Wheelwright, N. & Sollecito, S. (2003) Social pairing and female mating fidelity predicted by restriction fragment length polymorphism similarity at the major histocompatibility complex in songbird. Molecular Ecology, 12, 30773083.
  • Friedl, T. & Klump, G. (2002) Extrapair paternity in the red bishop (Euplectes orix): Is there evidence for the good-genes hypothesis? Behaviour, 139, 777800.
  • Gil, D., Graves, J., Hazon, N. & Wells, A. (1999) Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science, 286, 126128.
  • Goossens, B., Coulon, J., Allainé, D., Graziani, L. & Bel, M.-C. (1996) Immigration of a pregnant female in an Alpine Marmot family group: behavioural and genetic data. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Paris, 319, 241246.
  • Goossens, B., Graziani, L., Waits, L.P., Farand, E., Magnolon, S., Coulon, J., Bel, M.-C., Taberlet, P. & Allainé, D. (1998a) Extra-pair paternity in the monogamous Alpine marmot revealed by nuclear DNA microsatellite analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43, 281288.
  • Goossens, B., Waits, L.P. & Taberlet, P. (1998b) Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping. Molecular Ecology, 7, 12371241.
  • Griffith, S., Owens, I. & Thuman, K. (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11, 21952212.
  • Grimm, V., Dorndorf, N., Frey-Roos, F., Wissel, C., Wyszomirski, T. & Arnold, W. (2003) Modelling the role of social behavior in the persistence of the alpine marmot Marmota marmota. Oikos, 102, 124136.
  • Hacklander, K., Mostl, E. & Arnold, W. (2003) Reproductive suppression in female Alpine marmots, Marmota marmota. Animal Behaviour, 65, 11331140.
  • Hamilton, W. (1990) Mate choice near and far. American Zoologist, 30, 341352.
  • Hanslik, S. & Kruckenhauser, L. (2000) Microsatellite loci for two European sciurid species (Marmota marmota, Spermophilus citellus). Molecular Ecology, 9, 21632165.
  • Hansson, B. & Westerberg, L. (2002) On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 11, 24672474.
  • Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. & Von Schantz, T. (1996) Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature, 381, 229232.
  • Horton, N.J. & Lipsitz, S.R. (1999) Review of software to fit generalized estimating equation regression models. American Statistician, 53, 160169.
  • Jennions, M. & Petrie, M. (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 75, 2164.
  • Johnson, J.B. & Omland, K.S. (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 101108.
  • Kempenaers, B., Verheyen, G. & Dhondt, A. (1997) Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): Female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 481492.
  • Kempenaers, B., Congdon, B., Boag, P. & Robertson, R. (1999) Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis? Behavioral Ecology, 10, 304311.
  • Klinkicht, M. (1993) Untersuchugen zum paarungssystem des Alpenmurmeltiers, Marmota M. marmota mittels DNA fingerprinting. PhD Thesis, University of Munich, Germany.
  • Kraaijeveld, K., Carew, P., Billing, T., Adcock, G. & Mulder, R. (2004) Extra-pair paternity does not result in differential sexual selection in the mutually ornamented black swan (Cygnus atratus). Molecular Ecology, 13, 16251633.
  • Krokene, C., Rigstad, K., Dale, M. & Lifjeld, J. (1998) The function of extra-pair paternity in blue tits and great tits: Good genes or fertility insurance? Behavioral Ecology, 9, 649656.
  • Lebreton, J.-D. & Pradel, R. (2002) Multistate recapture models: modelling incomplete individual histories. Journal of Applied Statistics, 29, 359369.
  • Lebreton, J.-D., Burnham, K.P., Clobert, J. & Anderson, D.R. (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs, 62, 67118.
  • Lubjuhn, T., Strohbach, S., Brun, J., Gerken, T. & Epplen, J. (1999) Extra-pair paternity in great tits (Parus major) – a long term study. Behaviour, 136, 11571172.
  • Nichols, J.D. (1992) Capture–recapture models: using marked animals to study population dynamics. Bioscience, 42, 94102.
  • Oli, M. & Armitage, K. (2004) Yellow-bellied marmot population dynamics: demographic mechanisms of growth and decline. Ecology, 85, 24662455.
  • Perrin, C., Allainé, D. & Le Berre, M. (1993) Socio-spatial organization and activity distribution of the alpine marmot Marmota marmota: preliminary results. Ethology, 93, 2130.
  • Pradel, R., Wintrebert, C. & Gimenez, O. (2003) A proposal for a goodness-of-fit test to the Arnason-Schwarz multisite capture–recapture model. Biometrics, 59, 4353.
  • R Development Core Team (2003) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Rassmann, K., Arnold, W. & Tautz, D. (1994) Low genetic variability in a natural alpine marmot population (Marmota marmota, Sciuridae) revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Molecular Ecology, 3, 347353.
  • Raymond, M. & Rousset, R. (1995) GENEPOP Version 1·2: Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248249.
  • Schmoll, T., Dietrich, V., Winkel, W., Epplen, J. & Lubjuhn, T. (2003) Long-term fitness consequences of female extra-pair matings in a socially monogamous passerine. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. Biological Sciences, 270, 259264.
  • Sheldon, B. (1994) Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. Biological Sciences, 257, 2530.
  • Sillero-Zubiri, C., Gottelli, D. & Macdonald, D.W. (1996) Male philopatry, extra-pack copulations and inbreeding avoidance in Ethiopian wolves (Canis simensis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38, 331340.
  • Stephens, P., Frey-Roos, F., Arnold, W. & Sutherland, W. (2002) Model complexity and population predictions. The alpine marmot as a case study. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71, 343361.
  • Strohbach, S., Curio, E., Bathen, A., Epplen, J. & Lubjuhn, T. (1998) Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the ‘good genes’ hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology, 9, 388396.
  • Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited review. Molecular Ecology, 9, 10131027.
  • Trivers, R. (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (ed. B.Campbell), pp. 136179. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, IL.
  • Watson, P.J. (1991) Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Animal Behavior, 41, 343360.
  • Westneat, D. & Stewart, I. (2003) Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates and conflict. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 34, 365396.
  • Westneat, D., Sherman, P. & Morton, M. (1990) The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. Current Ornithology, 7, 331369.
  • Whittingham, L. & Dunn, P. (2001) Survival of extra-pair and within-pair young in tree swallows. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 496500.
  • Williams, G. (1975) Sex and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Wolf, L. (1975) ‘Prostitution’ behaviour in a tropical hummingbird. Condor, 77, 140144.
  • Zeh, J. & Zeh, D. (1996) The evolution of polyandry. I. Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. Biological Sciences, 263, 17111717.
  • Zeh, J. & Zeh, D. (1997) The evolution of polyandry II: Post-copulatory defences against genetic compatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. Biological Sciences, 264, 6975.