SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aars, J., Andreassen, H.P. & Ims, R.A. (1995) Root voles: litter sex ratio variation in fragmented habitat. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 459472.
  • Bond, M.L., Wolff, J.O. & Krackow, S. (2003) Recruitment sex ratios in gray-tailed voles (Microtus canicaudus) in response to density, sex ratio, and season. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81, 13061311.
  • Bondrup-Nielsen, S. & Ims, R.A. (1990) Reversed sexual size dimorphism in microtines: are females larger than males or are males smaller than females? Evolutionary Ecology, 4, 261272.
  • Bronson, F.H. (1989) Mammalian Reproductive Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Brown, G.R. (2001) Sex-biased investment in nonhuman primates: can Trivers & Willard’s theory be tested? Animal Behaviour, 61, 683694.
  • Cameron, E.Z. & Linklater, W.L. (2002) Sex bias in studies of sex bias: the value of daughters to mothers in poor condition. Animal Behaviour, 63, F5F8.
  • Charnov, E.I. (1982) The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Clark, M.M., Waddingham, C.L. & Galef, B.G. Jr (1991) Further evidence of sex-biased maternal investment by Mongolian gerbil dams. Animal Behaviour, 42, 161162.
  • Clutton-Brock, T.H. (1989) Mammalian mating systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 236, 339372.
  • Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Iason, G.R. (1986) Sex ratio variation in mammals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 61, 339374.
  • Cockburn, A., Legge, S. & Double, M.C. (2002) Sex ratios in birds and mammals: can the hypotheses be disentangled? Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods (ed. I.C.W.Hardy), pp. 266286. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Frank, S.A. (1990) Sex allocation theory for birds and mammals. Annual Review in Ecology and Systematics, 21, 1355.
  • Hardy, I.C.W. (1997) Possible factors influencing vertebrate sex ratios: an introductory overview. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 51, 217241.
  • Hewison, A.J. & Gaillard, J.-M. (1999) Successful sons or advantaged daughters? The Trivers-Willard model and sex-biased maternal investment in ungulates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 229234.
  • Holand, Ø., Mysterud, A., Røed, K.H., Coulson, T., Gjøstein, H., Weladji, R.B. & Nieminen, M. (2006) Adaptive adjustment of offspring sex ratio and maternal reproductive effort in an iteroparous mammal. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 273, 293299.
  • Humphries, M.M. & Boutin, S. (2000) The determinants of optimal litter size in free-ranging red squirrels. Ecology, 81, 28672877.
  • Kallio, E.R.K., Begon, M., Henttonen, H., Koskela, E., Mappes, T., Vaheri, A. & Vapalahti, O. (2009) Cyclic hantavirus epidemics in humans – predicted by rodent host dynamics. Epidemics, in press. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2009.03.002.
  • Kawata, M. (1985) Mating system and reproductive success of the red-backed vole, Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae. Oikos, 45, 181190.
  • Klemme, I., Eccard, J.A., Gerlach, G., Horne, T.J. & Ylönen, H. (2006) Does it pay to be a dominant male in a promiscuous species? Annales Zoologici Fennici, 43, 248257.
  • Koivula, M., Koskela, E., Mappes, T. & Oksanen, T.A. (2003) Cost of reproduction in the wild: manipulation of reproductive effort in the bank vole. Ecology, 84, 398405.
  • Koskela, E. (1998) Offspring growth, survival and reproductive success in the bank vole: a litter size manipulation experiment. Oecologia, 115, 379384.
  • Koskela, E., Jonsson, P., Hartikainen, T. & Mappes, T. (1998) Limitation of reproductive success by food availability and litter size in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265, 11291134.
  • Koskela, E., Juutistenaho, P., Mappes, T. & Oksanen, T.A. (2000) Offspring defence in relation to litter size and age: experiment in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Evolutionary Ecology, 14, 99109.
  • Koskela, E., Huitu, O., Koivula, M., Korpimäki, E. & Mappes, T. (2004) Sex-biased maternal investment in voles: importance of environmental conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, 13851391.
  • Król, E., Murphy, M. & Speakman, J.R. (2007) Limits to sustained energy intake. X. Effects of fur removal on reproductive performance in laboratory mice. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 42334243.
  • Kruuk, L.E.B., Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D., Pemberton, J.M. & Guinness, F.E. (1999) Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature, 399, 459461.
  • Lambin, X. (1994) Sex-ratio variation in relation to female philopatry in Townsend voles. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 945953.
  • Lee, P.C. (1987) Nutrition, fertility and maternal investment in primates. Journal of Zoology, 213, 409422.
  • Leimar, O. (1996) Life-history analysis of the Trivers and Willard sex-ratio problem. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 316325.
  • Mappes, T. & Koskela, E. (2004) Genetic basis of the trade-off between offspring number and quality in the bank vole. Evolution, 58, 645650.
  • Mappes, T., Koskela, E. & Ylönen, H. (1995a) Reproductive costs and litter size in the bank vole. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 261, 1924.
  • Mappes, T., Ylönen, H. & Viitala, J. (1995b) Higher reproductive success among kin groups of bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus. Ecology, 76, 12761282.
  • McClure, P.N. (1981) Sex-biased litter reduction in food-restricted wood rats (Neotoma floridana). Science, 211, 10581060.
  • McGuire, B. & Bemis, W.E. (2007) Parental care. Rodent Societies: An Ecological & Evolutionary Perspective (eds J.O.Wolff & P.W.Sherman), pp. 231242. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
  • McShea, W.J. & Madison, D.M. (1986) Sex ratio shifts within litters of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 18, 431436.
  • Mills, S.C., Grapputo, A., Koskela, E. & Mappes, T. (2007a) Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 274, 143150.
  • Mills, S.C., Alatalo, R.V., Koskela, E., Mappes, J., Mappes, T. & Oksanen, T.A. (2007b) Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation. Evolution, 61, 17481757.
  • Mills, S.C., Grapputo, A., Jokinen, I., Koskela, E., Mappes, T., Oksanen, T.A. & Poikonen, T. (2009) Testosterone-mediated effects on fitness-related phenotypic traits and fitness. American Naturalist, 173, 475487.
  • Montgomerie, R.D. & Weatherhead, P.J. (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 63, 167187.
  • Oksanen, T.A., Alatalo, R.V., Horne, T.J., Koskela, E., Mappes, J. & Mappes, T. (1999) Maternal effort and male quality in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266, 14951500.
  • Oksanen, T.A., Jokinen, I., Koskela, E., Mappes, T. & Vilpas, H. (2003) Manipulation of offspring number and size: benefits of large body size at birth depend upon the rearing environment. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 321330.
  • Ostfeld, R.S. (1985) Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents. American Naturalist, 126, 115.
  • Ostfeld, R.S. & Heske, E.J. (1993) Sexual dimorphism and mating systems in voles. Journal of Mammalogy, 74, 230233.
  • Paterson, S. & Lello, J. (2003) Mixed models: getting the best use of parasitological data. Trends in Parasitology, 19, 370375.
  • Ralls, K. (1976) Mammals in which females are larger than males. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 51, 245276.
  • Roff, D. (1992) The Evolution of Life Histories. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Schulte-Hostedde, A.I. (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in rodents. Rodent Societies: An Ecological & Evolutionary Perspective (eds J.O.Wolff & P.W.Sherman), pp. 115128. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
  • Schulte-Hostedde, A.I., Millar, J.S. & Gibbs, H.L. (2002) Female biased sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus): sex-specific patterns of annual reproductive success and survival. Evolution, 56, 25192529.
  • Schulte-Hostedde, A.I., Zinner, B., Millar, J.S. & Hickling, G.J. (2005) Restitution of mass-size residuals: validating body condition indices. Ecology, 86, 155163.
  • Sheldon, B.C. & West, S.A. (2004) Maternal dominance, maternal condition, and offspring sex ratio in ungulate mammals. American Naturalist, 163, 4054.
  • Sikes, R.S. (2007) Facultative sex ratio adjustment. Rodent Societies: An Ecological & Evolutionary Perspective (eds J.O.Wolff & P.W.Sherman), pp. 129138. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
  • Trivers, R.L. (1985) Social Evolution. The Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo Park, CA.
  • Trivers, R.L. & Willard, D.E. (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science, 179, 9092.
  • Weckerly, F.W. (1998) Sexual-size dimorphism: influence of mass and mating systems in the most dimorphic mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 79, 3352.
  • Yoccoz, N.G. & Mesnager, S. (1998) Are alpine bank voles larger and more sexually dimorphic because adults survive better? Oikos, 82, 8598.