SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Byström, P., Persson, L. & Wahlström, E. (1998) Competing predators and prey: juvenile bottlenecks in whole-lake experiments. Ecology, 79, 21532167.
  • Calder, W.A. III (1984) Size, Function and Life-History. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Cameron, T.C., Wearing, H.J., Rohani, P. & Sait, S.T. (2007) Two-species asymmetric competition: effects of age structure on intra- and interspecific interactions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 8393.
  • Casini, M., Hjelm, J., Molinero, J.-C., Lövgren, J., Cardinale, M., Bartolino, V., Belgrano, A. & Kornilovs, G. (2009) Trophic cascades promote threshold-like shifts in pelagic marine ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 197202.
  • Chase, J.M. (2003) Experimental evidence for alternative stable equilibria in a benthic pond food web. Ecology Letters, 6, 733741.
  • Cheong, R.T., Henrich, S., Farr, J.A. & Travis, J. (1984) Variation in fecundity and its relationship to body size in a population of the Least Killifish, Heterandria formosa (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Copeia, 3, 720726.
  • Cisneros, J.J. & Rosenheim, J.A. (1997) Ontogenetic change of prey preference in the generalist predator Zelus renardii and its influence on predator–predator interactions. Ecological Entomology, 22, 399407.
  • Claessen, D., De Roos, A.M. & Persson, L. (2000) Dwarfs and giants: cannibalism and competition in size-structured populations. The American Naturalist, 155, 219237.
  • Crawley, M.J. (2002) Statistical Computing. An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Crumrine, P.W. (2005) Size structure and substitutability in an odonate intraguild predation system. Oecologia, 145, 132139.
  • Dick, J.T.A., Montgomery, W.I. & Elwood, R.W. (1999) Intraguild predation may explain an amphipod replacement: evidence from laboratory populations. Journal of Zoology, 249, 463468.
  • Diehl, S. & Feißel, M. (2000) Effects of enrichment on three-level food chains with omnivory. The American Naturalist, 155, 200218.
  • Diehl, S. & Feißel, M. (2001) Intraguild prey suffer from enrichment of their resources: a microcosm experiment with ciliates. Ecology, 82, 29772983.
  • Ebenman, B. & Persson, L. (eds) (1988) Size-Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Fraser, E.A. & Renton, R.M. (1940) Observations on the breeding and development of the viviparous fish, Heterandria formosa. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 81, 479520.
  • Griffin, B.D. & Byers, J.E. (2006) Intraguild predation reduces redundancy of predator species in multiple predator assemblages. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 959966.
  • HilleRisLambers, R. & Dieckmann, U. (2003) Competition and predation in simple food webs: intermediately strong trade-offs maximize coexistence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 270, 25912598.
  • Holt, R.D. & Polis, G.A. (1997) A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. The American Naturalist, 149, 745764.
  • Hutchings, J.A. (2000) Collapse and recovery of marine fishes. Nature, 406, 882885.
  • Kooijman, S.A.L.M. (2000) Dynamic Energy and Mass Budgets in Biological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Montserrat, M., Magalhães, S., Sabelis, M.W., De Roos, A.M. & Janssen, A. (2008) Patterns of exclusion in an intraguild predator–prey system depend on initial conditions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 624630.
  • Morin, P. (1999) Productivity, intraguild predation, and population dynamics in experimental food webs. Ecology, 80, 752760.
  • Mylius, S.D., Klumpers, K., De Roos, A.M. & Persson, L. (2001) Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient. The American Naturalist, 158, 259276.
  • Neill, W.E. (1975) Experimental studies of microcrustacean competition, community composition and efficiency of resource utilization. Ecology, 56, 809826.
  • Neill, W.E. (1988) Community response to experimental nutrient perturbations in oligotrophic lakes: the importance of bottlenecks in size-structured populations. Size-Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution (eds B.Ebenman & L.Persson), pp. 236255. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Olson, M.H. (1996) Ontogenetic niche shifts in Largemouth Bass: variability and consequences for first-year growth. Ecology, 77, 179190.
  • Olson, M.H., Mittelbach, G.G. & Osenberg, C.W. (1995) Competition between predator and prey – resource-based mechanisms and implications for stage-structured dynamics. Ecology, 76, 17581771.
  • Paine, R.T. (1976) Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus–Pisaster interaction. Ecology, 57, 858873.
  • Persson, L. & Greenberg, L.A. (1990) Juvenile competitive bottlenecks, the perch (Perca fluviatilis)–roach (Rutilus Rutilus) interaction. Ecology, 71, 4456.
  • Persson, L., Leonardsson, K., De Roos, A.M., Gyllenberg, M. & Christensen, B. (1998) Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structured consumer-resource model. Theoretical Population Biology, 54, 270293.
  • Persson, L., De Roos, A.M. & Byström, P. (2007) State-dependent invasion window for prey in size-structured predator–prey systems: whole lake experiments. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 94104.
  • Peters, R.H. (1983) The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Pimm, S.L. & Rice, J.C. (1987) The dynamics of multi-species, multi-life stage models of aquatic food webs. Theoretical Population Biology, 32, 303325.
  • Polis, G.A. (1984) Age structure component of niche width and intraspecific resource partitioning: can age groups function as ecological species? The American Naturalist, 123, 541564.
  • Polis, G.A., Myers, C.M. & Holt, R.D. (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 297330.
  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3- 900051-07-0; URL: http://www.R-project.org
  • Reznick, D. & Miles, D.B. (1989) Review of life history patterns in poeciliid fishes. Ecology and Evolution of Live-Bearing Fishes (Poeciliidae) (eds G.K.Meffe & F.F.Snelson), pp. 125148. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  • Rice, J.A., Crowder, L.B. & Rose, K.A. (1993) Interactions between size-structured predator and prey populations: experimental test and model comparison. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 122, 481491.
  • Rice, J.A., Crowder, L.B. & Marschall, E.A. (1997) Predation on juvenile fishes: dynamic interactions between size-structured predators and prey. Early Life History and Recruitment in Fish Populations (eds R.C.Chambers & E.A.Trippel), pp. 333356. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
  • Richardson, J.M.L., Gunzburger, M.S. & Travis, J. (2006) Variation in predation pressure as a mechanism underlying differences in numerical abundance between populations of the poeciliid fish Heterandria formosa. Oecologia, 147, 596605.
  • Rosen, D.E. & Bailey, R.M. (1963) The poeciliid fishes (Cyprinodontiformes): their structure, zoogeography, and systematics. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 126, 1176.
  • Rudolf, V.H.W. (2007) The interaction of cannibalism and omnivory: consequences for community dynamics. Ecology, 88, 26972705.
  • Rudolf, V.H.W. & Armstrong, J. (2008) Emergent properties of cannibalism and size-refuge in prey on intraguild predation systems. Oecologia, 157, 675686.
  • Schröder, A., Persson, L. & De Roos, A.M. (2009) Culling experiments demonstrate size-class specific biomass increases with mortality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 26712676.
  • Travis, J. & Henrich, S. (1986) Some problems in estimating the intensity of selection through fertility differences in natural and experimental populations. Evolution, 40, 786790.
  • Turner, A.M., Turner, R.R. & Ray, S.R. (2007) Competition and intraguild egg predation among freshwater snails: re-examining the mechanism of interspecific interactions. Oikos, 116, 18951903.
  • Van de Wolfshaar, K.E. (2006) Population Persistence in the Face of Size-Dependent Predation and Competition Interactions, PhD thesis. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
  • Van de Wolfshaar, K.E., De Roos, A.M. & Persson, L. (2006) Size-dependent interactions inhibit coexistence in intraguild predation systems with life-history omnivory. The American Naturalist, 168, E62E75.
  • Walters, C. & Kitchell, J.F. (2001) Cultivation/depensation effects on juvenile survival and recruitment: implications for the theory of fishing. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 3950.
  • Werner, E.E. (1988) Size, scaling, and the evolution of complex life cycles. Size-Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution (eds B.Ebenman & L.Persson), pp. 6081. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Werner, E.E. (1994) Ontogenetic scaling of competitive relations: size-dependent effects and responses in two Anuran larvae. Ecology, 75, 197213.
  • Werner, E.E. & Gilliam, J.F. (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 393425.
  • Wilbur, H.M. (1988) Interactions between growing predators and growing prey. Size-Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution (eds B.Ebenman & L.Persson), pp. 157172. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Woodward, G. & Hildrew, A.G. (2002) Body-size determinants of niche overlap and intraguild predation within a complex food web. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71, 10631074.