SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anholt, B.R. & Werner, E.E. (1995) Interaction between food availability and predation mortality mediated by adaptive behavior. Ecology, 76, 22302234.
  • Banks, P.B., Norrdahl, K. & Korpimäki, E. (2000) Nonlinearity in the predation risk of prey mobility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 267, 16211625.
  • Banks, P.B., Norrdahl, K. & Korpimäki, E. (2002) Mobility decisions and the predation risks of reintroduction. Biological Conservation, 103, 133138.
  • Banks, P.B., Hughes, N.K. & Rose, T.A. (2003) Do native Australian small mammals avoid faeces of domestic dogs? Responses of Rattus fuscipes and Antechinus stuartii. The Australian Zoologist, 32, 406409.
  • Besag, J. (1977) Contribution to the discussion of Dr. Ripley’s paper. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology, 39, 193195.
  • Brown, R.E. (1985) The rodents II: Suborder Myomorpha. Social Odours in Mammals (eds R.E.Brown & D.W.MacDonald), pp. 345457. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Brown, R.E. & MacDonald, D.W. (1985) Social Odours in Mammals, Vols 1 & 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P., Smith, R.J. & Wirtz W.O. II (1988) The effects of owl predation on the foraging behaviour of heteromyid rodents. Oecologia, 76, 408415.
  • Conover, M.R. (2007) Predator-Prey Dynamics: The Role of Olfaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J.R. (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 205, 489511.
  • Dickman, C.R. (1992) Predation and habitat shift in the house mouse, Mus domesticus. Ecology, 73, 313322.
  • Diggle, P.J. (2003) Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. Arnold, London, UK.
  • Downes, S.J. (2002) Does responsiveness to predator scents affect lizard survivorship? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 3842.
  • Drickamer, L.C. (1982) Acceleration and delay of sexual maturation in female mice via chemosignals: circadian rhythm effects. Biology of Reproduction, 27, 596601.
  • Dunn, P.O. & Whittingham, L.A. (2007) Search costs influence the spatial distribution, but not the level, of extra-pair mating in tree swallows. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 449454.
  • Fauchald, P. (1999) Foraging in a hierarchical patch system. The American Naturalist, 153, 603613.
  • Fitzgerald, B.M. & Turner, D.C. (2000) Hunting behaviour of domestic cats and their impact on prey populations. The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour (eds D.C.Turner & P.Bateson), pp. 151175. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Gosling, L.M. (1981) Demarcation in a gerenuk territory: an economic approach. Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie, 56, 305322.
  • Gosling, L.M. (1990) Scent marking by resource holders: alternative mechanisms for advertising the costs of competition. Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5 (eds D.W.MacDonald, D.Muller-Schwarze & S.E.Natynczuk), pp. 315328. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Hedrick, A.V. & Dill, L.M. (1993) Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Animal Behaviour, 46, 193196.
  • Higgins, C.L. & Strauss, R.E. (2004) Discrimination and classification of foraging paths produced by search-tactic models. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 248254.
  • Hughes, N.K., Kelley, J.L. & Banks, P.B. (2009) Receiving behaviour is sensitive to risks from eavesdropping predators. Oecologia, 160, 609617.
  • Hughes, N.K., Korpimäki, E. & Banks, P.B. (in press) The predation risks of interspecific eavesdropping: weasel-vole interactions. Oikos.
  • Hurst, J.L. (1987) The functions of urine marking in a free-living population of house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty. Animal Behaviour, 35, 14331442.
  • Hurst, J.L. (1989) The complex network of olfactory communication in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty: urine marking and investigation within family groups. Animal Behaviour, 37, 705725.
  • Hurst, J.L. (1990a) Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. I. Communication between males. Animal Behaviour, 40, 209222.
  • Hurst, J.L. (1990b) Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. II. Communication between females. Animal Behaviour, 40, 223232.
  • Hurst, J.L. (1993) The priming effects of urine substrate marks on interactions between male house mice, Mus musculus domesticus Schwarz and Schwarz. Animal Behaviour, 45, 5581.
  • Hurst, J.L. & Beynon, R.J. (2004) Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice. BioEssays, 26, 12881298.
  • Jędrzejewski, W., Rychlik, L. & Jędrzejewska, B. (1993) Responses of bank voles to odors of seven species of predators: experimental data and their relevance to natural predator-vole relationships. Oikos, 68, 251257.
  • Jonsson, P., Koskela, E. & Mappes, T. (2000) Does risk of predation by mammalian predators affect the spacing behaviour of rodents? Two large-scale experiments. Oecologia, 122, 487492.
  • Koivula, M. & Korpimäki, E. (2001) Do scent marks increase predation risk of microtine rodents? Oikos, 95, 275281.
  • Korpimäki, E., Koivunen, V. & Hakkarainen, H. (1996) Microhabitat use and behavior of voles under weasel and raptor predation risk: predator facilitation? Behavioral Ecology, 7, 3034.
  • Lima, S.L. (1998) Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 27, 215290.
  • Lima, S.L. (2002) Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 7075.
  • Lima, S.L. & Dill, L.M. (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 619640.
  • Nachman, G. (2006) A functional response model of a predator population foraging in a patchy habitat. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 948958.
  • Norrdahl, K. & Korpimäki, E. (1998) Does mobility or sex of voles affect risk of predation by mammalian predators? Ecology, 79, 226232.
  • Österholm, H. (1964) The significance of distance receptors in the feeding behaviour of the fox (Vulpes vulpes L.). Acta Zoologica Fennica, 106, 131.
  • Parsons, G.J. & Bondrup-Nielsen, S. (1996) Experimental analysis of behaviour of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) to odours of the short-tailed weasel (Mustela erminea). Ecoscience, 3, 6369.
  • Pastro, L.A. & Banks, P.B. (2006) Foraging responses of wild house mice to accumulations of conspecific odor as a predation risk. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 101107.
  • Rich, T.J. & Hurst, J.L. (1998) Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of males. Animal Behaviour, 56, 727735.
  • Ripley, B. (1976) The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. Journal of Applied Probability, 13, 255266.
  • Ripley, B. (1981) Spatial Statistics. Wiley, New York.
  • Roberts, S.C., Gosling, L.M., Thornton, E.A. & McClung, J. (2001) Scent-marking by male mice under the risk of predation. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 698705.
  • Rohr, J.R. & Madison, D.M. (2001) A chemically mediated trade-off between predation risk and mate search in newts. Animal Behaviour, 62, 863869.
  • Ruxton, G.D. (2005) Increasing search rate over time may cause a slower than expected increase in prey encounter rate with increasing prey density. Biology Letters, 1, 133135.
  • Schmidt, K.A. & Brown, J.S. (1996) Patch assessment in fox squirrels: the role of resource density, patch size, and patch boundaries. The American Naturalist, 147, 360380.
  • Skelly, D.K. (1994) Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. Animal Behaviour, 47, 465468.
  • Stephens, D.W. (2007) Models of information use. Foraging: Behavior and Ecology (eds D.W.Stephens, J.S.Brown & R.C.Ydenberg), pp. 3158. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  • Sundell, J., Eccard, J.A., Tiilikainen, R. & Ylönen, H. (2003) Predation rate, prey preference and predator switching: experiments on voles and weasels. Oikos, 101, 615623.
  • Sutherland, D.R. & Singleton, G.R. (2003) Monitoring activity patterns and social interactions of small mammals with an automated event-recording system: wild house mice (Mus domesticus) as a case study. Rats, Mice and People: Rodent Biology and Management (eds G.R.Singelton, L.A.Hinds, C.J.Krebs & D.M.Spratt), pp. 159164. ACIAR, Canberra, ACT.
  • Tinbergen, N., Impekoven, M. & Franck, D. (1967) An experiment on spacing-out as a defence against predation. Behaviour, 28, 307321.
  • Vergassola, M., Villermaux, E. & Shraiman, B.I. (2007) ‘Infotaxis’ as a strategy for searching without gradients. Nature, 445, 406409.
  • Viswanathan, G.M., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Da Luz, M.G.E., Raposo, E.P. & Stanley, H.E. (1999) Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature, 401, 911914.
  • Wiegand, T. & Moloney, K.A. (2004) Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos, 104, 209.
  • Wolff, J.O. (2004) Scent marking by voles in response to predation risk: a field-laboratory validation. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 286289.
  • Wolff, J.O. & Davis-Born, R. (1997) Response of gray-tailed voles to odours of a mustelid predator: a field test. Oikos, 79, 543548.
  • Ylönen, H., Sundell, J., Tiilikainen, R., Eccard, J.A. & Horne, T. (2003) Weasels’ (Mustela nivalis nivalis) preference for olfactory cues of the vole (Clethrionomys glareolus). Ecology, 84, 14471452.
  • Zuk, M. & Kolluru, G.R. (1998) Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Quarterly Review of Biology, 73, 415438.