SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arakaki, S. & Tokeshi, M. (2005) Microhabitat selection in intertidal gobiid fishes: species- and size-associated variation. Marine Biology Research, 1, 3947.
  • Arakaki, S. & Tokeshi, M. (2006) Short-term dynamics of tidepool fish community: diel and seasonal variation. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 76, 221235.
  • Black, R. (1979) Competition between intertidal limpets: an intrusive niche on a steep resource gradient. Journal of Animal Ecology, 48, 401411.
  • Chase, J.M. & Leibold, M.A. (2003) Ecological Niches, Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Colwell, R.K. & Winkler, D.W. (1984) A null model for null models in biogeography. Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence (eds D.R.Strong, D.Simberloff, A.G.Abele & A.B.Thistle), pp. 344359. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Connell, J.H. (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. The American Naturalist, 122, 661696.
  • Crowell, K.L. & Pimm, S.L. (1976) Competition and niche shifts of mice introduced onto small islands. Oikos, 27, 251258.
  • Davis, J.L.D. (2000) Spatial and seasonal patterns of habitat partitioning in a guild of southern California tidepool fishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 196, 253268.
  • Dôtu, Y. (1955) Life history of a goby, Gobius poecilichthys Jordan et Synder. Science Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University, 15, 7786 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  • Elmberg, J., Pöysä, H., Sjöberg, K. & Nummi, P. (1997) Interspecific interactions and co-existence in dabbling ducks: observations and an experiment. Oecologia, 111, 129136.
  • Elton, C. (1927) Animal Ecology. Sidgwick and Jackson, London.
  • Faria, C. & Almada, V. (2001) Microhabitat segregation in three rocky intertidal fish species in Portugal: does it reflect interspecific competition? Journal of Fish Biology, 58, 145159.
  • Gibson, R.N. (1972) The vertical distribution and feeding relationship of intertidal fish on the Atlantic coast of France. Journal of Animal Ecology, 41, 189207.
  • Gibson, R.N. & Yoshiyama, R.M. (1999) Intertidal fish communities. Intertidal Fishes: Life in Two Worlds (eds M.H.Horn, K.L.Martin & M.A.Chotkowski), pp. 264296. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Gilpin, M.E. & Diamond, J.M. (1984) Are species co-occurrence on islands non-random, and are null hypotheses useful in community ecology? Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence (eds D.R.Strong, D.Simberloff, L.G.Abele & A.B.Thistle), pp. 297315. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Gilpin, M.E. & Hanski, I. (1991) Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge University press, Cambridge.
  • Gotelli, N.J. & Graves, G.R. (1996) Null Models in Ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
  • Gotelli, N.J. & Rohde, K. (2002) Co-occurrence of ectoparasites of marine fishes: a null model analysis. Ecology Letters, 5, 8694.
  • Griffiths, S.P. (2002) Retention of visible implant tags in small rockpool fishes. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 236, 307309.
  • Grinnell, J. (1914) An account of the mammals and birds of the lower Colorado Valley with especial reference to the distributional problems presented. University of Colorado Publication in Zoology, 12, 51294.
  • Gurevitch, J. & Hedges, L.V. (2001) Meta-analysis. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments, 2nd edn (eds S.M.Scheiner & J.Gurevitch), pp. 347369. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L.L., Wallace, A. & Walsh, J.S. (1992) A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments. The American Naturalist, 140, 539572.
  • Hairston, N.G. (1980) The experimental test of an analysis of field distributions: competition in terrestrial salamanders. Ecology, 61, 817826.
  • Hanski, I. (1999) Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Hilton, Z., Wellenreuther, M. & Clements, K.D. (2008) Physiology underpins habitat partitioning in a sympatric sister-species pair of intertidal fishes. Functional Ecology, 22, 11081117.
  • Hutchinson, G.E. (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415427.
  • Lawlor, L.R. (1980) Structure and stability in natural and randomly constructed competitive communities. The American Naturalist, 116, 394408.
  • Lee, S.C. & Silliman, B.R. (2006) Competitive displacement of a detritivorous salt marsh snail. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 339, 7585.
  • Levine, J.M. & HilleRisLambers, J. (2009) The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity. Nature, 461, 254257.
  • MacArthur, R.H. (1958) Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology, 39, 599619.
  • Mayr, M. & Berger, A. (1992) Territoriality and microhabitat selection in two intertidal New Zealand fish. Journal of Fish Biology, 40, 243256.
  • McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 178185.
  • Metaxas, A. & Scheibling, R.E. (1993) Community structure and organization of tidepools. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 98, 187198.
  • Morin, P.J. (1999) Community Ecology. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA.
  • Munday, P.L., Jones, G.P. & Caley, M.J. (2001) Interspecific competition and coexistence in a guild of coral-dwelling fishes. Ecology, 82, 21772189.
  • Nakamura, R. (1976) Experimental assessment of factors influencing microhabitat selection by the two tidepool fishes Oligocottus maculosus and O. snyderi. Marine Biology, 37, 97104.
  • Nakano, S., Fausch, K.D. & Kitano, S. (1999) Flexible niche partitioning via a foraging mode shift: a proposed mechanism for coexistence in stream-dwelling charrs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 68, 10791092.
  • Odling-Smee, F.J., Laland, K.N. & Feldman, M.W. (2003) Niche Construction, the Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Olson, M.H., Mittelbach, G.G. & Osenberg, C.W. (1995) Competition between predator and prey: resource-based mechanisms and implications for stage-structured dynamics. Ecology, 76, 17581771.
  • Pacala, S.W. & Roughgarden, J. (1982) Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in two-two-species insular anolis lizard communities. Science, 217, 444446.
  • Pearman, P.B., Guisa, A., Broennimann, O. & Randin, C.F. (2008) Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 149158.
  • Pfister, C.A. (1995) Estimating competition coefficients from census data: a test with field manipulations of tidepool fishes. The American Naturalist, 146, 271291.
  • Pfister, C.A. (2006) Concordance between short-term experiments and long-term censuses in tide pool fishes. Ecology, 87, 29052914.
  • Pulliam, H.R. (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters, 3, 349361.
  • Rosenzweig, M.L. (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology, 62, 327335.
  • Sale, P.F. (1974) Overlap in resource use, and interspecific competition. Oecologia (Berlin), 17, 245256.
  • Sasaki, T. & Hattori, J. (1969) Comparative ecology of two closely related sympatric gobiid fishes living in tide pools. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology, 15, 143155 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  • Schoener, T.W. (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185, 2739.
  • Schoener, T.W. (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. The American Naturalist, 122, 240285.
  • Schofield, P.J. (2003) Habitat selection of two gobies (Microgobius gulosus, Gobiosoma robustum): influence of structural complexity, competitive interactions, and presence of predator. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 288, 125137.
  • Stephens, J.S., Johnson, R.K., Key, G.S. & McCosker, J.E. (1970) The comparative ecology of three sympatric species of California blennies of the genus Hypsoblennius Gill (Teleostomi, Blenniidae). Ecological Monographs, 40, 213233.
  • Tilman, D. (2004) Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 1085410861.
  • Tokeshi, M. (1986) Resource utilization, overlap and temporal community dynamics: a null model analysis of an epiphytic chironomid community. Journal of Animal Ecology, 55, 491506.
  • Tokeshi, M. (1999) Species Coexistence: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
  • Tokeshi, M. & Romero, L. (2000) Spatial overlap and coexistence in a mussel-associated Polychaete assemblage on a South American rocky shore. P.S.Z.N.: Marine Ecology, 21, 247261.
  • Werner, E.E. & Hall, D.J. (1976) Niche shifts in sunfishes: experimental evidence and significance. Science, 191, 404406.
  • Werner, E.E. & Hall, D.J. (1977) Competition and habitat shift in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology, 58, 869876.
  • Wilson, D.S. & Yoshimura, J. (1994) On the coexistence of specialists and generalists. The American Naturalist, 144, 692707.
  • Winemiller, K.O. & Pianka, E.R. (1990) Organization in natural assemblages of desert lizards and tropical fishes. Ecological Monographs, 60, 2755.