SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrams, P.A. (2010) Implications of flexible foraging for interspecific interactions: lessons from simple models. Functional Ecology, 24, 717.
  • Anderson, D.R. (2008) Model Based Inference in the Life Sciences: A Primer on Evidence. Springer, New York, NY.
  • Arditi, R. & Akaçakaya, H. R. (1990) Understanding of mutual interference of predators. Oecologia, 83, 358361.
  • Bolker, B., Holyoak, M., Křivan, V., Rowe, L. & Schmitz, O. (2003) Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology, 84, 11011114.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model Selection and Multi-model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Collins, M.D., Ward, S.A. & Dixon, A.F.G. (1981) Handling time and the functional response of Aphelinus thomsoni, a predator and parasite of the aphid Drepanosiphum platanoidis. Journal of Animal Ecology, 50, 479487.
  • Cook, R.M. & Cockrell, B.J. (1978) Predator ingestion rate and its bearing on feeding time and the theory of optimal diets. Journal of Animal Ecology, 47, 529547.
  • Cooper, W.E. & Anderson, R. (2006) Adjusting prey handling times and methods affects profitability in the broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps). Herpetologica, 62, 356365.
  • Dicke, M. & Sabelis, M.W. (1987) How plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguards. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 38, 148165.
  • Giller, P.S. (1980) The control of handling time and its effects on the foraging strategy of a heteropteran predator, Notonecta. Journal of Animal Ecology, 49, 699712.
  • Hauzy, C., Tully, T., Spataro, T., Paul, G. & Arditi, R. (2010) Spatial heterogeneity and functional response: an experiment in microcosms with varying obstacle densities. Oecologia, 163, 625636.
  • Hoetker, G. (2007) The use of logit and probit modles in strategic management research: critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 331343.
  • Jeschke, J.M., Kopp, M. & Tollrian, R. (2002) Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling time and digesting prey. Ecological Monographs, 72, 95112.
  • Juliano, S.A. (1993) Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. Design and Analysis of Ecology Experiments (eds S.M. Scheiher & J. Gurevitch), pp. 159181. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
  • Juliano, S.A. & Williams, F.M. (1987) A comparison of methods for estimating the functional-response parameters of the random predator equation. Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 641653.
  • Křivan, V. & Schmitz, O.J. (2004). Trait and density mediated indirect interactions in simple food webs. Oikos, 107, 239250.
  • Křivan, V. & Sirot, E. (2004) Do short-term behavioral response of consumers in tri-trophic food chains persist at population time-scale? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 6, 10631081.
  • Kratina, P., Vos, M. & Anholt, B.R. (2007) Species diversity modulates predation. Ecology, 88, 19171923.
  • Kratina, P., Vos, M., Bateman, A. & Anholt, B.R. (2009) Functional responses modified by predator density. Oecologia, 159, 425433.
  • McCoy, M.W. & Bolker, B.M. (2008) Trait-mediated interactions: influence of prey size, density and experience. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 478486.
  • Mols, C.M.M., van Oers, K., Witjes, L.M.A., Lessells, C.M., Drent, P.J. & Visser, M.E. (2004) Central assumptions of predator–prey models fail in a semi-natural experimental system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 271, S85S87.
  • Murdoch, W.W., Briggs, C.J. & Nisbet, R.M. (2003) Consumer-Resource Dynamics. Monographs in Population Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Nagelkerke, N.J.K. (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78, 691691.
  • Okuyama, T. (2009) Local interactions between predators and prey call into question commonly used functional responses. Ecological Modelling, 220, 11821188.
  • Okuyama, T. (2010) Prey density-dependent handling time in a predator–prey model. Community Ecology, 11, 9196.
  • van Rijn, P.C., Bakker, F.M., der Hoeven, W.A.D. & Sabelis, M.W. (2005) Is arthropod predation exclusively satiation-driven? Oikos, 109, 101116.
  • Ripplinger, J. & Sullivan, J. (2007) Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis? Systematic Biology, 57, 7685.
  • Ruxton, G.D. (2005) Increasing search rate over time may cause a slower than expected increase in prey encounter rate with increasing prey density. Biology Letters, 1, 133135.
  • Škaloudová, B., Zemek, R. & Křivan, V. (2007) The effectr of predation risk on an acarine system. Animal Behaviour, 74, 813821.
  • Stephens, D.W. & Krebs, J.R. (1986) Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Trexler, J.C., McCulloch, C.E. & Travis, J. (1998) How can the functional response best be determined? Oecologica, 76, 206214.
  • Tully, T., Cassey, P. & Ferriére, R. (2005) Functional response: rigorous estimation and sensitivity to genetic variation in prey. Oikos, 111, 479487.
  • Turchin, P. (2003) Complex Population Dyanmics: A Theoretical/Empirical Synthesis. Monographs in Population Biology 35. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.