REVIEW

You have free access to this content

Direct fitness of group living mammals varies with breeding strategy, climate and fitness estimates

  1. Luis A. Ebensperger1,*,
  2. Daniela S. Rivera1,
  3. Loren D. Hayes2

Article first published online: 2 MAR 2012

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01973.x

Issue

Journal of Animal Ecology

Journal of Animal Ecology

Volume 81, Issue 5, pages 1013–1023, September 2012

Additional Information

How to Cite

Ebensperger, L. A., Rivera, D. S. and Hayes, L. D. (2012), Direct fitness of group living mammals varies with breeding strategy, climate and fitness estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81: 1013–1023. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01973.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ecología and Biodiversidad (CASEB), and Departamento de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 114-D, Santiago, Chile

  2. 2

    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA

* Correspondence author. E-mail: lebensperger@bio.puc.cl

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 7 AUG 2012
  2. Article first published online: 2 MAR 2012
  3. Received 28 April 2011; accepted 2 February 2012 Handling Editor: Fanie Pelletier

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (298K)

References

  • Alexander, R.D. (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 5, 325–383.
  • Alexander, R.A., Scozzaro, M.J. & Borodkin, L.J. (1989) Statistical and empirical examination of the chi-square test for homogeneity of correlations in meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 329–331.
  • Altmann, J. & Alberts, S.C. (2003) Intraspecific variability in fertility and offspring survival in a nonhuman primate: behavioural control of ecological and social sources. Offspring: The Biodemography of Fertility and Family Behavior (eds K.W. Wachter & R.A. Bulatao), pp. 140–169. National Academy Press, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  • Altringham, J.D. (1996) Bats: Biology and Behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Armitage, K.B. (1981) Sociality as a life history tactic of ground squirrels. Oecologia, 48, 36–49.
  • Barash, D.P. (1974) The evolution of marmot societies: a general theory. Science, 185, 415–420.
  • Bertram, B.C.R. (1978) Living in groups: predators and prey. Behavioural Ecology: And Evolutionary Approach (eds J.R. Krebs & N.B. Davies), pp. 64–96. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.
  • Blumstein, D.T. (2006) The multipredator hypothesis and the evolutionary persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology, 112, 209–217.
    Direct Link:
  • Boyce, C.C.K. & Boyce, J.L. (1988) Population biology of Microtus arvalis. I. Lifetime reproductive success of solitary and grouped breeding females. Journal of Animal Ecology, 57, 711–722.
  • Brashares, J.S. & Arcese, P. (2002) Role of forage, habitat and predation in the behavioral plasticity of a small African antelope. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71, 626–638.
    Direct Link:
  • Brown, J.L. (1987) Helping and Communal Breeding in Birds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  • Byers, J.A. (1997) American Pronghorn. Social Adaptations and the Ghosts of Predators Past. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Cant, M.A. (2000) Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses. Animal Behaviour, 59, 147–158.
  • Clark, C.W. & Mangel, M. (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theoretical Population Biology, 30, 45–75.
  • Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D. & Guinness, F.E. (1988) Reproductive success in male and female red deer. Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems (ed. T.H. Clutton-Brock), pp. 325–343. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Cohen, J. (1969) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Academic Press, New York, USA.
  • Cowan, D.P. (1987) Group living in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): mutual benefit or resource localization? Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 779–795.
  • Da Silva, J., Macdonald, D.W. & Evans, P.G.H. (1994) Net costs of group living in a solitary forager, the Eurasian badger (Meles meles). Behavioral Ecology, 5, 151–158.
  • Dugdale, H.L., Ellwood, S.A. & Macdonald, D.W. (2010) Alloparental behavior and long-term cost of mother tolerating other members of the group in a plurally breeding mammal. Animal Behaviour, 80, 721–735.
  • Dugdale, H.L., Macdonald, D.W., Pope, L.C., Johnson, P.J. & Burke, T. (2008) Reproductive skew and relatedness in social groups of European badgers, Meles meles. Molecular Ecology, 17, 1815–1827.
    Direct Link:
  • Ebensperger, L.A. (2001) A review of the evolutionary causes of rodent group-living. Acta Theriologica, 46, 115–144.
  • Ebensperger, L.A. & Blumstein, D.T. (2006) Sociality in New World hystricognath rodents is linked to predators and burrow digging. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 410–418.
  • Ebensperger, L.A. & Cofré, H. (2001) On the evolution of group-living in the New World cursorial hystricognath rodents. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 227–236.
  • Emlen, S.T. & Oring, L.W. (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.
  • Fiske, P., Rintamäki, P.T. & Karvonen, E. (1998) Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis. Behavioral Ecology, 9, 328–338.
  • Furuichi, T. (2009) Factors underlying party size differences between chimpanzees and bonobos: a review and hypotheses for future study. Primates, 50, 197–209.
  • Ganem, G. & Nevo, E. (1996) Ecophysiological constraints associated with aggression, and evolution toward pacifism in Spalax ehrenbergi. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38, 245–252.
  • Gurevitch, J. & Hedges, L.V. (1993) Meta-analysis: combining the results of independent experiments. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments, 1st edn (eds S.M. Scheiner & J. Gurevitch), pp. 378–398. Champan and Hall, New York, USA.
  • Gurevitch, J. & Hedges, L.V. (1999) Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology, 80, 1142–1149.
  • Gurevitch, J., Morrison, J.A. & Hedges, L.V. (2000) The interaction between competition and predation: a meta-analysis of field experiments. The American Naturalist, 155, 435–453.
  • Hardy, L.V. & Thompson, S.G. (1998) Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 841–856.
    Direct Link:
  • Harrington, F.H., Mech, L.D. & Fritts, S.H. (1983) Pack size and wolf pup survival: their relationship under varying ecological conditions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 13, 19–26.
  • Hayes, L.D. (2000) To nest communally or not to nest communally: a review of rodent communal nesting and nursing. Animal Behaviour, 59, 677–688.
  • Hayes, L.D., Chesh, A.S., Castro, R.A., Tolhuysen, L.O., Burger, J.R., Bhattacharjee, J. & Ebensperger, L.A. (2009) Fitness consequences of group living in the degu Octodon degus, a plural breeder rodent with communal care. Animal Behaviour, 78, 131–139.
  • Hayes, L.D. & Solomon, N.G. (2004) Costs and benefits of communal rearing to female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56, 585–593.
  • Higgins, J.P.T. & Thompson, S.G. (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1539–1558.
    Direct Link:
  • Higgins, J.P.T., Thompson, S.G., Deeks, J.J. & Altman, D.G. (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta- analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557–560.
  • Hoogland, J.L. (1981) Nepotism and cooperative breeding in the black-tailed prairie dog (Sciuridae: Cynomys ludovicianus). Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory (eds R.D. Alexander & D.W. Tinkle), pp. 283–310. Chiron Press, New York, USA.
  • Hoogland, J.L. (1995) The Black-Tailed Prairie Dog: Social Life of a Burrowing Mammal. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Hsu, M.J., Lin, J.F. & Agoramoorthy, G. (2006) Effects of group size on birth rate, infant mortality and social interactions in Formosan macaques at Mt. Longevity, Taiwan. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 18, 3–17.
  • Huedo-Medina, T.B., Sanchez-Meca, J. & Martin-Martinez, F. (2006) Assessing Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysis: q statistic or I2 index? Psychological Methods, 11, 193–206.
  • Hunter, J.E., Schmith, F.L. & Jackson, G.B. (1982) Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies. Sage Publications, Beverlys Hills, California, USA.
  • Jarvis, J.U.M., O’Riain, M.J., Bennett, N.C. & Sherman, P.W. (1994) Mammalian eusociality: a family affair. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 47–51.
  • Johnson, D.D.P., Jetz, W. & Macdonald, D.W. (2002) Environmental correlates of badger social spacing across Europe. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 411–425.
    Direct Link:
  • King, W.J. & Allainé, D. (2002) Social, maternal, and environmental influences in reproductive success in female Alpine marmots (Marmota marmota). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80, 2137–2143.
  • Krause, J. & Ruxton, G.D. (2002) Living in Groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Lacey, E.A. (2004) Sociality reduces individual fitness in a communally breeding rodent, the colonial tuco-tuco (Ctenomys sociabilis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56, 449–457.
  • Lucia, K.E., Keane, B., Hayes, L.D., Lin, Y.K., Schaefer, R.L. & Solomon, N.G. (2008) Philopatry in prairie voles: an evaluation of the habitat saturation hypothesis. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 774–783.
  • Madison, D.M. (1984) Group nesting and its ecological and evolutionary significance in overwintering microtine rodents. Winter Ecology of Small Mammals (ed. J.F. Merritt), pp. 267–274. Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Special Publication 10, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Majolo, B., De Bartolini Vizioli, A. & Schino, G. (2008) Cost and benefits of group living in primates: group size effects on behaviour and demography. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1235–1247.
  • Manning, C.J., Dewsbury, D.A., Wakeland, E.K. & Potts, W.K. (1995) Communal nesting and communal nursing in house mice, Mus musculus domesticus. Animal Behaviour, 50, 741–751.
  • McComb, K., Moss, C., Durant, S.M., Baker, L. & Sayialel, S. (2001) Matriarchs as repositories of social knowledge in African elephants. Science, 292, 491–494.
  • McGuire, B., Getz, L.L. & Oli, M.K. (2002) Fitness consequences of sociality in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster: influence of group size and composition. Animal Behaviour, 64, 645–654.
  • Moehlman, P.D. (1979) Jackal helpers and pup survival. Nature, 277, 382–383.
  • Møller, A.P. & Saino, N. (2004) Immune response and survival. Oikos, 104, 299–304.
    Direct Link:
  • Packer, C., Pusey, A.E. & Eberly, L.E. (2001) Egalitarism in female African lions. Science, 293, 690–693.
  • Parrish, J.K., Hamner, W.M. & Prewitt, C.T. (1997) Introduction – From individuals to aggregations: unifying properties, global framework, and the holy grails of congregation. Animal Groups in Three Dimensions (eds J.K. Parrish & W. Hamner), pp. 1–13. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Pilastro, A., Missiaglia, E. & Marin, G. (1996) Age-related reproductive success in solitarily and communally nesting female dormice (Glis glis). Journal of Zoology, London, 239, 601–608.
    Direct Link:
  • Randall, J.A., Rogovin, K., Parker, P.G. & Eimes, J.A. (2005) Flexible social structure of a desert rodent, Rhombomys opimus: philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 961–973.
  • Reeve, H.K. & Sherman, P.W. (1993) Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 1–32.
  • Robinson, J.G. (1988) Group size in wedge-capped capuchin monkeys Cebus olivaceus and the reproductive success of males and females. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 187–197.
  • Rosenberg, M.S., Adams, D.C. & Gurevitch, J. (2000) MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis, Version 2. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1991) Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, USA.
  • Rosenthal, R. & Rubin, D.B. (2003) r equivalent: a simple effect size Indicator. Psychological Methods, 8, 492–496.
  • Roulin, A. & Heeb, P. (1999) The immunological function of allosuckling. Ecology Letters, 2, 319–324.
    Direct Link:
  • Sanchez-Meca, J. & Martin-Martinez, F. (1997) Homogeneity test in meta-analysis: a Monte Carlo comparison of statistical power and Type I error. Quality and Quantity, 31, 385–399.
  • Schradin, C. & Pillay, N. (2005) Intraspecific variation in the spatial and social organization of the African striped mouse. Journal of Mammalogy, 86, 99–107.
  • Segerstrom, S.C. & Miller, G.E. (2004) Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 601–630.
  • Silk, J.B. (2007) The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 362, 539–559.
  • Simmons, N.B. & Conway, T.M. (2003) Evolution of ecological diversity of bats. Bat Ecology (eds T.H. Kunz & M. Brock Fenton), pp. 493–535. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Solomon, N.G. & Crist, T.O. (2008) Estimates of reproductive success for group-living prairie voles Microtus ochrogaster, in high-density populations. Animal behavior, 76, 881–892.
  • Solomon, N.G. & Getz, L.L. (1997) Examination of alternative hypotheses for cooperative breeding in rodents. Cooperative Breeding in Mammals (eds N.G. Solomon & J.A. French), pp. 199–230. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Solomon, N.G. & Hayes, L.D. (2009) The biological basis of alloparental behaviour in mammals. Substitute Parents: Biological and Social Perspectives on Alloparenting in Human Societies (eds G. Bentley & R. Mace), pp. 13–49. Berghahn Books, Herndon, Virginia, USA.
  • Sparkman, A.M., Adams, J., Beyer, A., Steury, T.D., Waits, L. & Murray, D.L. (2011) Helper effects on pup lifetime fitness in the cooperatively breeding red wolf (Canis rufus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biological Series, 278, 1381–1389.
  • Stankowich, T. & Blumstein, D.T. (2005) Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences, 272, 2627–2634.
  • Stokes, E.J., Parnell, R.J. & Olejniczak, C. (2003) Female dispersal and reproductive success in wild western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 329–339.
  • Takahata, Y., Suzuki, S., Okayasu, N., Sugiura, H., Takahashi, H., Yamagiwa, J., Izawa, K., Agetsuma, N., Hill, D., Saito, C., Sato, S., Tanaka, T. & Sprague, D. (1998) Does troop size of wild Japanese macaques influence birth rate and infant mortality in the absence of predators? Primates, 39, 245–251.
  • Vásquez, R.A. & Kacelnik, A. (2000) Foraging rate versus sociality in the starling Sturnus vulgaris. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Biological Series, 267, 157–164.
  • Verdolin, J.L. (2006) Meta-analysis of foraging and predation risk trade-offs in terrestrial systems. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 457–464.
  • Watts, D.P. (1996) Comparative socioecology of gorillas. Great Ape Societies (eds W.C. McGrew, L.F. Marchant & T. Nishida), pp. 16–28. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Watts, H.E. & Holekamp, K.E. (2009) Ecological determinants of survival and reproduction in the spotted hyena. Journal of Mammalogy, 90, 461–471.
  • Wey, T., Blumstein, D.T., Shen, W. & Jordán, F. (2008) Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Animal Behaviour, 75, 333–344.
  • Whitehead, H. (2008) Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis. Chicago University Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Whitehead, H. & Mann, J. (2000) Female reproductive strategies of cetaceans. Cetacean Societies: Field Studies of Dolphins and Whales (eds J. Mann, R.C. Connor, P.L. Tyack & H. Whitehead), pp. 219–246. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Wolff, J.O. (1994) Reproductive success of solitarily and communally nesting white-footed and deer mice. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 206–209.
  • Woodroffe, R. & Macdonald, D.W. (1993) Badger sociality–models of spatial grouping. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 65, 145–169.
View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (298K)