SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arim, M. & Marquet, P.A. (2004) Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology. Ecology Letters, 7, 557564.
  • Briggs, C.J. & Borer, E.T. (2005) Why short-term experiments may not allow long-term predictions about intraguild predation. Ecological Applications, 15, 11111117.
  • Cheong, R., Heinrich, S., Farr, J. & Travis, J. (1984) Variation in fecundity and its relationship to body size in a population of the Least Killifish, Heterandria formosa (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Copeia, 3, 720726.
  • Diehl, S. & Feissel, M. (2001) Intraguild prey suffer from enrichment of their resources?: A microcosm experiment with ciliates. Ecology, 82, 29772983.
  • Finke, D.L. & Denno, R.F. (2006) Spatial refuge from intraguild predation: implications for prey suppression and trophic cascades. Oecologia, 149, 265275.
  • Frank, S. (1977) Den stora Fiskboken. Folket i bild.
  • Griffen, B.D. & Byers, J.E. (2006) Partitioning mechanisms of predator interference in different habitats. Oecologia, 146, 608614.
  • Hin, V., Schellekens, T., Persson, L. & De Roos, A.M. (2011) Coexistence of predator and prey in intraguild predation systems with ontogenetic niche shifts. The American Naturalist, 178, 701714.
  • Holt, R.D. & Polis, G.A. (1997) A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. The American Naturalist, 149, 745764.
  • Janssen, A., Sabelis, M.W., Magalhães, S., Montserrat, M. & van der Hammen, T. (2007) Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology, 88, 27132719.
  • Maser, G.L., Guichard, F. & McCann, K.S. (2007) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of enriched metacommunities. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 247, 337345.
  • McCann, K., Hastings, A. & Huxel, G.R. (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature, 395, 794798.
  • Montserrat, M., Magalhães, S., Sabelis, M.W., De Roos, A.M. & Janssen, A. (2008) Patterns of exclusion in an intraguild predator-prey system depend on initial conditions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 624630.
  • Montserrat, M., Magalhães, S., Sabelis, M.W., De Roos, A.M. & Janssen, A. (2012) Invasion success in communities with reciprocal intraguild predation depends on the stage structure of the resident population. Oikos, 121, 6776.
  • Neill, W.E. (1988) Community responses to experimental nutrient perturbations in oligotrophic lakes: the importance of bottlenecks in size-structured populations. Size-Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution (eds B. Ebenman & L. Persson), pp. 236255. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Nilsson, K.A., Lundbäck, S., Postavnicheva-Harri, A. & Persson, L. (2011) Guppy populations differ in cannibalistic degree and adaptation to structural environments. Oecologia, 167, 391400.
  • Persson, L. (1991) Behavioral response to predators reverses the outcome of competition between prey species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 28, 101105.
  • Persson, L. & Crowder, L.B. (1997) Fish-habitat interactions mediate via ontogenetic niche shifts. The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes (eds E. Jeppsen, M. Sondergaard & K. Christoffersen), pp. 323. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Persson, L. & De Roos, A.M. (2012) Mixed competition-predation: potential vs. realized interactions. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81, 483493.
  • Persson, L., De Roos, A.M. & Byström, P. (2007) State-dependent invasion windows for prey in size-structured predator-prey systems: whole lake experiments. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 94104.
  • Persson, L. & Eklöv, P. (1995) Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology, 76, 7081.
  • Polis, G.A., Myers, C.A. & Holt, R.D. (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 297330.
  • Reznick, D. & Miles, D.B. (1989) Review of life history patterns in poeciliid fish. Ecology and Evolution of Live-Bearing Fish (Poeciliidae) (eds G.K. Meffe & F.F. Snelson), pp. 125148. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN3- 900051-07-0;URL: http://www.R-project.org.
  • Rudolf, V.H.W. & Lafferty, K.D. (2011) Stage structure alters how complexity affects stability of ecological networks. Ecology Letters, 14, 7579.
  • Schröder, A., Nilsson, K.A., Persson, L., van Kooten, T. & Reichstein, B. (2009) Invasion success depends on invader body size in a size-structured mixed predation-competition community. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78, 11521162.
  • Sokale, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) BIOMETRY The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
  • Werner, E.E. & Gilliam, J.F. (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 393425.
  • Werner, E.E. & Hall, D.J. (1988) Ontogenetic habitat shifts in bluegill: the foraging rate - predation risk trade-off. Ecology, 69, 13521366.
  • Wilbur, H.M. (1988) Interactions between growing predators and growing prey. Size-Structured Populations: Ecology and Evolution (eds B. Ebenmann & L. Persson), pp. 157172. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Winfield, I.J. (1986) The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilis. Journal of Fish Biology, 29, 3748.
  • van de Wolfshaar, K.E., De Roos, A.M. & Persson, L. (2006) Size-dependent interactions inhibit coexistence in intraguild predation systems with life-history omnivory. The American Naturalist, 168, 6275.