Optimizing dispersal study design by Monte Carlo simulation

Authors

  • OLAV SKARPAAS,

    Corresponding author
    1. The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Biology and IGDP in Ecology, 208 Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA; and
    Search for more papers by this author
  • KATRIONA SHEA,

    1. The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Biology and IGDP in Ecology, 208 Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA; and
    Search for more papers by this author
  • JAMES M. BULLOCK

    1. NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, CEH Dorset, Winfrith Technology Centre, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 8ZD, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

and present address: Olav Skarpaas, Department of Biology, PO Box 1066, Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway (fax +47 22854001; e-mail olav.skarpaas@bio.uio.no).

Summary

  • 1The distribution of dispersal distances (the dispersal kernel) is a major determinant of spatial population dynamics, yet little is known about the shape of the dispersal kernel for most species. This is partly because of the relative difficulty of measuring dispersal, exacerbated by a lack of standardized protocols. We suggest that this problem can be addressed by using modelling approaches to aid the design of studies to quantify dispersal.
  • 2In this study we present such an approach by optimizing seed trap sampling design using stochastic simulations. A number of alternative sampling designs (random placements, grid arrays, transects, sectors and annuli arrangements) for a point source were tested against a common kernel to assess the best methods for estimating the dispersal kernel.
  • 3For a given source strength and total trap area, transects and sectors of traps usually provided better data for kernel estimation than random placement, grid arrays and annuli. Kernel estimation was improved by increasing the source strength (the number of dispersing propagules) and the trap area, as expected.
  • 4When the ‘true’ kernel was unknown, transects were slightly better for identifying the thin-tailed exponential distribution, whereas sectors were better for detecting the fat-tailed half-Cauchy.
  • 5In the case of anisotropic dispersal (here, dispersal biased in one direction), annuli and grid arrays performed better than transects and sectors when the anisotropy was unknown. However, when the anisotropy was anticipated, and the trap arrangements were adjusted accordingly, transects and sectors were better. This was true regardless of source strength and total trap area.
  • 6Synthesis and applications. This study presents a simulation approach to the design of dispersal experiments. While the general results of our simulations can be used by those designing field studies for plant point sources, the simulation approach itself can be modified for a wide range of organisms, dispersal mechanisms and dispersal measurement approaches. Thus, the approach presented here facilitates improvements of dispersal study designs, which in turn will increase the precision of dispersal kernel estimates and predictions of spatial population dynamics, including modelling of rates of spread or metapopulations. This is invaluable in a range of ecological applications, such as the management of rare or invasive species, predicting species’ response to climate change, or planning species reintroductions.

Ancillary