SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Akçakaya, H.R., Burgman, M.A., Kindvall, O., Wood, C.C., Sjögren-Gulve, P., Hatfield, J.S. & McCarthy, M.A. (2004) Species Conservation and Management. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Araújo, M.B. & Williams, P.H. (2000) Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data. Biological Conservation, 96, 331345.
  • Arthur, S.M., Manly, B.F.J., McDonald, L.L. & Garner, G.W. (1996) Assessing habitat selection when availability changes. Ecology, 77, 215227.
  • Augustin, N.H., Mugglestone, M.A. & Buckland, S.T. (1996) An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 339347.
  • Barry, S.C. & Welsh, A.H. (2002) Generalised additive modelling and zero inflated count data. Ecological Modelling, 157, 179188.
  • Boyce, M.S., Mao, J.S., Merrill, E.H., Fortin, D., Turner, M.G., Fryxell, J. & Turchin, P. (2003) Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park. Ecoscience, 10, 321332.
  • Boyce, M.S. & McDonald, L.L. (1999) Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 268272.
  • Boyce, M.S., Meyer, J.S. & Irwin, L.L. (1994) Habitat-based PVA for the northern spotted owl. Statistics in Ecology and Environmental Monitoring (eds D.J.Fletcher & B.F.J.Manly), pp. 6385. Otago Conference Series no. 2. University of Otago Press, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Boyce, M.S., Vernier, P.R., Nielsen, S.E. & Schmiegelow, F.K.A. (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling, 157, 281300.
  • Brotons, L., Thuiller, W., Araújo, M.B. & Hirtzel, A.H. (2004) Presence–absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography, 27, 437448.
  • Busby, J.R. (1986) A biogeoclimatic analysis of Nothofagus cunninghamii (Hook.) Oerst. in southeastern Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology, 11, 17.
  • Busby, J.R. (1991) bioclim – a bioclimatic analysis and prediction system. Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Biology Survey and Data Analysis (eds C.R.Margules & M.P.Austin), pp. 6468. CSIRO, Australia.
  • Campos, D., Kaur, A., Patil, G.P., Ripple, W.J. & Taillie, C. (1997) Resource selection by animals: the statistical analysis of binary response. Coenoses, 12, 121.
  • Carpenter, G., Gillison, A.N. & Winter, J. (1993) domain: a flexible modelling procedure for mapping potential distributions of plants and animals. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 667680.
  • Caughley, G., Short, J., Grigg, G.C. & Nix, H. (1987) Kangaroos and climate: an analysis of distribution. Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 751761.
  • Chefaoui, R.M., Hortal, J. & Lobo, J.M. (2005) Potential distribution modelling, niche characterisation and conservation status assessment using GIS tools: a case study of Iberian Copris species. Biological Conservation, 122, 327338.
  • Collett, D. (1991) Modelling Binary Data. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
  • Compton, B.W., Rhymer, J.M. & McCollough, M. (2002) Habitat selection by wood turtles (Clemmys insculpta): an application of paired logistic regression. Ecology, 83, 833843.
  • Dettki, H., Löfstrand, R. & Edenius, L. (2003) Modelling habitat suitability for moose in coastal northern Sweden: empirical vs. process-oriented approaches. Ambio, 32, 549556.
  • Dirnböck, T. & Dullinger, S. (2004) Habitat distribution models, spatial autocorrelation, functional traits and dispersal capacity of alpine plant species. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15, 7784.
  • Elith, J. & Burgman, M.A. (2002) Habitat models for PVA. Population Viability in Plants (eds C.A.Brigham & M.W.Schwartz), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
  • Ferrier, S. & Watson, G. (1996) An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Environmental Surrogates and Modelling Techniques in Predicting the Distribution of Biological Diversity. Consultancy report prepared by the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service for the Department of Environment, Sport and Territories.
  • Ferrier, S., Watson, G., Pearce, J. & Drielsma, M. (2002) Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. I. Species-level modelling. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 22752307.
  • Frair, J.L., Nielsen, S.E., Merrill, E.H., Lele, S., Boyce, M.S., Munro, R.H.M., Stenhouse, G.B. & Beyer, H.L. (2004) Removing habitat-induced, GPS-collar bias from inferences of habitat selection. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 201212.
  • Graham, C.H., Ferrier, S., Huettman, F., Moritz, C. & Peterson, A.T. (2004) New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 497503.
  • Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N.E. (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135, 147186.
  • Guo, Q., Kelly, M. & Graham, C.H. (2005) Support vector machines for predicting distribution of Sudden Oak Death in California. Ecological Modelling, 182, 7590.
  • Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. (2001) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction. Springer Verlag, New York.
  • Hirzel, A.H., Hausser, J., Chessel, D. & Perrin, N. (2002) Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? Ecology, 83, 20272036.
  • Hirzel, A.H., Hausser, J. & Perrin, N. (2004) Biomapper 3·0, User's Manual[online]. Available at: http://www.unil.ch/biomapper[accessed September 2004].
  • Hirzel, A.H., Helfer, V. & Metral, F. (2001) Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecological Modelling, 145, 111121.
  • Johnson, C.J., Nielsen, S.E., Merrill, E.H., McDonald, T.L. & Boyce, M.S. (2006) Resource selection functions based on use-availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods. Journal of Wildlife Management, in press.
  • Johnson, C.J., Parker, K.L., Heard, D.C. & Gillingham, M.P. (2002) A multiscale behavioural approach to understanding the movements of woodland caribou. Ecological Applications, 12, 18401860.
  • Johnson, C.J., Seip, D.R. & Boyce, M.S. (2004) A quantitative approach to conservation planning: using resource selection functions to map the distribution of mountain caribou at multiple spatial scales. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 238251.
  • Johnson, D.H. (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61, 6571.
  • Keating, K.A. & Cherry, S. (2004) Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat selection studies. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68, 774789.
  • Kent, M. & Coker, P. (1992) Vegetation Description and Analysis: a Practical Approach. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, UK.
  • Laidre, K.L., Heide-Jorgensen, M.P., Logdson, M.L., Hobbs, R.C., Heagerty, P., Dietz, R., Jorgensen, O.A. & Treble, M.A. (2004) Seasonal narwhal habitat associations in the high Arctic. Marine Biology, 145, 821831.
  • Lancaster, T. & Imbens, G. (1996) Case–control studies with contaminated controls. Journal of Econometrics, 71, 145160.
  • Law, B.S. (1994) Climatic limitation of the southern distribution of the common blossom bat Syconycteris autralis, New South Wales. Australian Journal of Ecology, 19, 366374.
  • Lindenmayer, D.B., Nix, H.A., McMahon, J.P., Hutchinson, M.F. & Tanton, M.T. (1991) The conservation of leadbeater's possum, Gymnobelideus leadbeateri (McCoy): a case study of the use of bioclimatic modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 18, 371383.
  • Manly, B.F.J., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L. & Erickson, W.P. (2002) Resource Selection by Animals, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Manning, A.D., Lindenmayer, D.B. & Barry, S.C. (2004) The conservation implications of bird reproduction in the agricultural ‘matrix’: a case study of the vulnerable superb parrot of south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 120, 363374.
  • Marzluff, J.M., Millspaugh, J.J., Hurvitz, P. & Handcock, M.S. (2004) Relating resources to a probabilistic measure of space use: forest fragments and Stellar's jays. Ecology, 85, 14111427.
  • McDonald, T.L. (2003) Estimation of resource selection functions when used and available samples overlap. Resource Selection Methods and Applications (ed. S.V.Huzurbazar), pp. 3539. Omnipress, Laramie, WY.
  • McDonald, T.E. & McDonald, L.L. (2001) A new ecological risk assessment procedure using resource selection models and geographical information systems. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30, 10151021.
  • Newey, W.K. & West, K.D. (1987) A simple, positive semidefinite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703708.
  • Nielsen, S.E., Boyce, M.S., Stenhouse, G.B. & Munro, R.H.M. (2002) Modeling grizzly bear habitats in the Yellowhead ecosystem of Alberta: taking autocorrelation seriously. Ursus, 13, 4556.
  • Nielsen, S.E., Johnson, C.J., Heard, D.C. & Boyce, M.S. (2005) Can models of presence–absence be used to scale abundance? Two case studies considering extremes in life history. Ecography, 28, 112.
  • Pearce, J. & Lindenmayer, D. (1998) Bioclimatic analysis to enhance reintroduction biology of the endangered Helmeted Honeyeater (Lichenostomus melanops cassidix) in southeastern Australia. Restoration Ecology, 6, 238243.
  • Reutter, B.A., Helfer, V., Hirzel, A.H. & Vogel, P. (2003) Modelling habitat-suitability using museum collections: an example with three sympatric Apodemus species from the Alps. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 581590.
  • Seber, G.A.F. (1984) Multivariate Observations. Wiley, New York, NY.
  • Soberón, J. & Peterson, A.T. (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics, 2, 110.
  • Stockwell, D. & Peters, D. (1999) The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographyraphic Information Science, 13, 143158.
  • Stockwell, D.R.B. & Peterson, A.T. (2002) Controlling bias in biodiversity data. Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale (eds J.M.Scott, P.J.Heglund, M.L.Morrison, J.B.Haufler, M.G.Raphael, W.A.Wall & F.B.Samson), pp. 537546. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  • Walker, P.A. & Cocks, K.D. (1991) habitat: a procedure for modelling a disjoint environmental envelope for a plant or animal species. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 1, 108118.
  • Walther, B., Wisz, M. & Rahbek, C. (2004) Known and predicted African winter distributions and habitat use of the endangered Basra reed warbler (Acrocephalus griseldis) and the near-threatened cinereous bunting (Emberiza cineracea). Journal of Ornithology, 145, 287299.
  • Welsh, A.H., Cunningham, R.B., Donnelly, C.F. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (1996) Modelling the abundance of rare species: statistical models for counts with extra zeros. Ecological Modelling, 88, 297308.
  • Van Winkle, W. (1975) Comparison of several probabilistic home-range models. Journal of Wildlife Management, 39, 118123.
  • Zaniewski, A.E., Lehmann, A. & Overton, J.M. (2002) Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecological Modelling, 157, 261280.