1365-2664/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=8b608cc23970983efcf0bf9354181123ee4feba9)
1365-2664/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=01405a21098d64198820bdbe2e30807b513e69f2)
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Unpalatable plants facilitate tree sapling survival in wooded pastures
Article first published online: 31 MAR 2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01147.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
SMIT, C., DEN OUDEN, J. and MÜLLER-SCHÄRER, H. (2006), Unpalatable plants facilitate tree sapling survival in wooded pastures. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43: 305–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01147.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 31 MAR 2006
- Article first published online: 31 MAR 2006
- Received 21 June 2005; final copy received 23 November 2005 Editor: Yvonne Buckley
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- associational resistance;
- cattle;
- Cirsium acaule;
- Gentiana lutea;
- grazing;
- Picea abies;
- tree regeneration
Summary
- 1In endangered wooded pasture ecosystems established tree saplings are frequently found in spatial association with protective structures, suggesting nurse effects. This associational resistance is thought to be a driving force behind tree regeneration in wooded pastures. Experimental evidence for associational resistance is, however, scarce. We studied the effects of unpalatable plants on tree sapling performance in a wooded pasture ecosystem in Switzerland and tested the associational resistance hypothesis experimentally.
- 2We transplanted 600 Picea abies saplings of two size classes (5 cm and 10 cm) in plots: (i) with unpalatable plants (either Gentiana lutea or Cirsium acaule, representing a chemically and mechanically defended species, respectively); (ii) with one of both unpalatable plants clipped to the ground; and (iii) without any unpalatable plants. Grazing intensity was measured once in each plot and tree sapling performance was followed for 2 consecutive years.
- 3Grazing intensity was significantly higher in plots without unpalatable plants, and significantly higher in plots with Cirsium than with Gentiana. Correspondingly, sapling survival (21·5% and 10·6% after 1 and 2 grazing years, respectively) was significantly higher near unpalatable plants, and significantly higher in plots with Gentiana than with Cirsium. Large tree saplings survived significantly better than small ones, and depended less on the unpalatable plants for survival.
- 4Except for saplings planted near Gentiana, sapling removal by cows and horses was the major cause of death, the extent varying between unpalatable species and treatments.
- 5The growth in height of the saplings was unaffected by the treatments.
- 6Synthesis and applications. This study shows that unpalatable plants can enhance tree regeneration in wooded pastures. Sapling survival was significantly higher near unpalatable plants where grazing intensity was significantly lower. Protection against cattle is particularly important for small saplings. These results have important management implications for the endangered and disappearing wooded pastures in western Europe. Transplanting tree saplings near unpalatable plants could be an alternative reforestation technique in intensively grazed wooded pastures. On the other hand, removal of unpalatable plants and shrubs might prevent or slow down undesired tree encroachment in less intensively grazed areas.