Directed connectivity among fish populations in a riverine network

Authors

  • ROBERT S. SCHICK,

    1. NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Fisheries Science Center – Fisheries Ecology Division, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA; and
    2. University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708–0328, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • STEVEN T LINDLEY

    1. NOAA Fisheries, Southwest Fisheries Science Center – Fisheries Ecology Division, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA; and
    Search for more papers by this author

Robert Schick, University Program in Ecology, Box 90328, Levine Science Research Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708–0328, USA (tel: + 1919 6138021; fax: + 1919 6848741; e-mail: robert.schick@duke.edu).

Summary

  • 1The addition of large water storage dams to rivers in California's Central Valley blocked access to spawning habitat and has resulted in a dramatic decline in the distribution and abundance of spring-run chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum 1792). Successful recovery efforts depend on an understanding of the historical spatial structure of these populations, which heretofore has been lacking.
  • 2Graph theory was used to examine the spatial structure and demographic connectivity of riverine populations of spring-run chinook salmon. Standard graph theoretic measures, including degree, edge weight and node strength, were used to uncover the role of individual populations in this network, i.e. which populations were sources and which were pseudo-sinks.
  • 3Larger spatially proximate populations, most notably the Pit River, served as sources in the historic graph. These source populations in the graph were marked by an increased number of stronger outbound connections (edges), and on average had few inbound connections. Of the edges in the current graph, seven of them were outbound from a population supported by a hatchery in the Feather River, which suggests a strong influence of the hatchery on the structure of the current extant populations.
  • 4We tested how the addition of water storage dams fragmented the graph over time by examining changing patterns in connectivity and demographic isolation of individual populations. Dams constructed in larger spatially proximate populations had a strong impact on the independence of remaining populations. Specifically, the addition of dams resulted in lost connections, weaker remaining connections and an increase in demographic isolation.
  • 5A simulation exercise that removed populations from the graph under different removal scenarios – random removal, removal by decreasing habitat size and removal by decreasing node strength – revealed a potential approach for restoration of these depleted populations.
  • 6Synthesis and applications. Spatial graphs are drawing the attention of ecologists and managers. Here we have used a directed graph to uncover the historical spatial structure of a threatened species, estimate the connectivity of the current populations, examine how the historical network of populations was fragmented over time and provide a plausible mechanism for ecologically successful restoration. The methods employed here can be applied broadly across taxa and systems, and afford scientists and managers a better understanding of the structure and function of impaired ecosystems.

Ancillary