SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Albert, R. & Barabási, A.-L. (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 4797.
  • Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R. & Vespignani, A. (2004) The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 37473752.
  • Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Oleson, J.M. (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science, 312, 431433.
  • Bjorkstedt, E.P., Spence, B.C., Garza, J.C., Hankin, D.G., Fuller, D., Jones, W.E., Smith, J.J. & Macedo, R. (2005) An Analysis of Historical Population Structure for Evolutionarily Significant Units of Chinook Salmon, Coho Salmon, and Steelhead in the North-Central California Coast Recovery Domain. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-382: 1210. US Department of Commerce, La Jolla, CA.
  • Brooks, C.P. (2006) Quantifying population substructure: extending the graph-theoretic approach. Ecology, 87, 864872.
  • Brown, J.H. & Kodric-Brown, A. (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology, 58, 445449.
  • Bunn, A.G., Urban, D.L. & Keitt, T.H. (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 265278.
  • Clark, J.S., Macklin, E. & Wood, L. (1998) Stages and spatial scales of recruitment limitation in southern Appalachian forests. Ecological Monographs, 68, 213235.
  • Clark, J.S., Silman, M., Kern, R., Macklin, E. & HilleRisLambers, J. (1999) Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology, 80, 14751494.
  • Cooper, A.B. & Mangel, M. (1999) The dangers of ignoring metapopulation structure for the conservation of salmonids. Fishery Bulletin, 97, 213226.
  • Dunham, J. & Rieman, B. (1999) Metapopulation structure of bull trout: influences of physical, biotic, and geometrical landscape characteristics. Ecological Applications, 9, 642655.
  • Fagan, W. (2002) Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology, 83, 32433249.
  • Fahrig, L. & Merriam, G. (1985) Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology, 66, 17621768.
  • Fortuna, M.A., Gómez-Rodríguez, C. & Bascompte, J. (2006) Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 273, 14291434.
  • Gastner, M.T. & Newman, M.E.J. (2006) The spatial structure of networks. European Physical Journal B, 49, 247252.
  • Gharrett, A., Gray, A. & Brykov, V. (2001) Phylogeographic analysis of mitochondrial DNA variation in Alaskan coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Fishery Bulletin, 99, 528544.
  • Gotelli, N. & Taylor, C. (1999) Testing metapopulation models with stream-fish assemblages. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1, 835845.
  • Gustafson, E. & Gardner, R. (1996) The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology, 77, 94107.
  • Guthrie, C. III & Wilmot, R. (2004) Genetic structure of wild chinook salmon populations of southeast Alaska and northern British Columbia. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 69, 8193.
  • Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 42, 316.
  • Harary, F. (1969) Graph Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Hastings, A. (1993) Complex interactions between dispersal and dynamics: lessons from coupled logistic equations. Ecology, 74, 13621372.
  • Hayes, B. (2000a) Graph theory in practice; part I. American Scientist, 88, 913.
  • Hayes, B. (2000b) Graph theory in practice; part II. American Scientist, 88, 104–109.
  • Hess, G.R. (1996a) Disease in metapopulation models: implications for conservation. Ecology, 77, 16171632.
  • Hess, G.R. (1996b) Linking extinction to connectivity and habitat destruction in metapopulation models. American Naturalist, 148, 226236.
  • Jansson, R., Backx, H., Boulton, A.J., Dixon, M., Dudgeon, D., Hughes, F.M.R., Nakamura, K., Stanley, E.H., Tockner, K. (2005) Stating mechanisms and refining criteria for ecologically successful river restoration: a comment on Palmer et al. (2005). Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 218222.
  • Kareiva, P. (1990) Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 330, 175190.
  • Kareiva, P. & Wennergren, U. (1995) Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature, 373, 299302.
  • Keeling, M.J., Bjørnstad, O.N. & Grenfell, B.T. (2004) Metapopulation dynamics of infectious disease. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations (eds I.Hanski & O. E.Gaggiotti), pp. 415445. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Keitt, T.H., Urban, D.L. & Milne, B.T. (1997) Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Ecology, 1. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art4/ (accessed 19 August 2007).
  • Lande, R., Engen, S. & Sæther, B.-E. (1999) Spatial scale of population synchrony: environmental correlation versus dispersal and density regulation. American Naturalist, 154, 271281.
  • Van Langevelde, F., Van Der Knaap, W.G.M. & Claassen, G.D.H. (1998) Comparing connectivity in landscape networks. Environment and Planning, B, Planning and Design, 25, 849863.
  • Levins, R. (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the of the Entomological Society of America, 15, 237240.
  • Lindley, S.T., Schick, R.S., May, B.P., Anderson, J.J., Green, S., Hanson, C., Low, A., McEwan, D., MacFarlane, R.B., Swanson. C. & Williams, J.G. (2004) Population structure of threatened and endangered chinook salmon ESUs in California's Central Valley Basin. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-360: 156. US Department of Commerce, La Jolla, CA.
  • McElhany, P., Ruckelshaus, M., Ford, M., Wainwright, T. & Bjorkstedt, E. (2000) Viable Salmonid Populations and the Recovery of Evolutionarily Significant Units. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-42: 1156. US Department of Commerce, Seattle, WA.
  • Milner, A. & Bailey, R. (1989) Salmonid colonization of new streams in Glacier Bay National Park. Alaska Aquaculture and Fisheries Management, 20, 179192.
  • Newman, M. (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167256.
  • Olsen, J., Miller, S., Spearman, W. & Wenburg, J. (2003) Patterns of intra- and inter-population genetic diversity in Alaskan coho salmon: implications for conservation. Conservation Genetics, 4, 557569.
  • Palmer, M.A., Bernhardt, E.S., Allan, J.D., Lanke, P.S., Alexander, G., Brooks, S., Carr, J., Clayton, S., Dahm, F.S.J., Galat, C.N., D.L., Loss, S.G., Goodwin, P., Hart, D.D., Hassett, B., Jenkinson, R., Kondolf, G.M., Lave, R., Meyer, J.L., O'Donnell, T.K., Pagano, L. & Sudduth, E. (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 208217.
  • Pickett, S.T.A. & White, P.S. (1985) Patch dynamics: a synthesis. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics (eds. S.T.A.Pickett & P.S.White), pp. 371384. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL.
  • Proulx, S., Promislow, D. & Phillips, P. (2005) Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 345353.
  • Pulliam, H. (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist, 132, 652661.
  • Quinn, T. (1993) A review of homing and straying of wild and hatchery-produced salmon. Fisheries Research, 18, 2944.
  • Ricker, W. (1972) Hereditary and environmental factors affecting certain salmonid populations. The Stock Concept in Pacific Salmon (eds R.Simon & P.Larkin), pp. 27160. H. R. MacMillan Lectures in Fisheries. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
  • Schooley, R.L. & Wiens, J.A. (2003) Finding habitat patches and directional connectivity. Oikos, 102, 559570.
  • Shrimpton, J.M. & Heath, D.D. (2003) Census vs. effective population size in chinook salmon: large- and small-scale environmental perturbation effects. Molecular Ecology, 12, 25712583.
  • Strogatz, S. (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410, 268276.
  • Sultan, S.E. & Spencer, H.G. (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. American Naturalist, 160, 271283.
  • Taylor, P.D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. & Merriam, G. (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, 68, 571573.
  • Tilman, D. & Lehman, C. (1997) Habitat destruction and species extinctions. Spatial Ecology (eds D.Tilman & P.Kareiva), pp. 233249. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Urban, D. & Keitt, T. (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology, 82, 12051218.
  • Waples, R. (1991) Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. and the definition of ‘species’ under the Endangered Species Act. Marine Fisheries Review, 53, 1122.
  • Waples, R. (1998) Evolutionarily significant units, distinct population segments, and the Endangered Species Act: reply to Pennock and Dimmick. Conservation Biology, 12, 718721.
  • Waples, R.S. & Gaggiotti, O. (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Molecular Ecology, 15, 14191439.
  • Watkinson, A.R. & Sutherland, W.J. (1995) Sources, sinks and oseudo-sinks. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 126130.
  • Watts, D. (2004) The ‘new’ science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 243270.
  • Wennergren, U., Ruckelshaus, M. & Kareiva, P. (1995) The promise and limitations of spatial models in conservation biology. Oikos, 74, 349356.
  • Wiens, J.A. (2002) Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology, 47, 501515.
  • Wood, C. (1995) Life history variation and population structure in sockeye salmon. Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation, American Fisheries Society Symposium 17 (ed. J.L.Nielsen), pp. 195216. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • Yoshiyama, R.M., Gerstung, E.R., Fisher, F.W. & Moyle, P.B. (2001) Historic and present distribution of chinook salmon in the Central Valley drainage of California. Fish Bulletin 179: Contributions to the Biology of Central Valley Salmonids, vol. 1. (ed. R.L.Brown), pp. 71176. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA.