SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andelman, S.J. & Fagan, W.F. (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 59545959.
  • Baldi, A. (2003) Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera, Diptera, and Acari species in Central Hungarian reserves. Basic and Applied Ecology, 4, 589593.
  • Balmford, A., Green, M.J.B. & Murray, M.G. (1996) Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness. I. Regional tests. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 263, 12671274.
  • Caro, T.M. & O'Doherty, G. (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 13, 805814.
  • Colwell, R.K. & Coddington, J.A. (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 345, 101118.
  • Ellison, A.M., Chen, J., Díaz, D., Kammerer-Burnham, C. & Lau, M. (2005) Changes in ant community structure and composition associated with hemlock decline in New England. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in the Eastern United States (eds B.Onken & R.Reardon), pp. 280289. US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Elzinga, C.L., Salzer, D.W., Willoughby, J.W. & Gibbs, J.P. (2001) Monitoring Plant and Animal Populations. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA, USA.
  • Favreau, J.M., Drew, C.A., Hess, G.R., Rubino, M.J., Koch, F.H. & Eschelbach, K.A. (2006) Recommendations for assessing the effectiveness of surrogate species approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 39493969.
  • Grenyer, R., Orme, C.D.L., Jackson, S.F. et al . (2006) Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature, 444, 9396.
  • Holyoak, M., Leibold, M.A. & Holt, R.D. (2005) Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Karban, R. & Huntzinger, M. (2006) How to do Ecology: A Concise Handbook. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Krebs, C.J. (1999) Ecological Methodology, 2nd edn. Addison-Welsey, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
  • Lamoreux, J.F., Morrison, J.C., Ricketts, T.H. et al . (2006) Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature, 440, 212214.
  • Lawton, J.H., Bignell, D.E., Bolton, B. et al . (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature, 391, 7276.
  • Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical Ecology, 2nd English edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • MacArthur, R.H. (1972) Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. Harper & Row, New York.
  • Magierowski, R.H. & Johnson, C.R. (2006) Robustness of surrogates of biodiversity in marine benthic communities. Ecological Applications, 16, 22642275.
  • Magurran, A.E. (1988) Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
  • Maurer, D. (2000) The dark side of the taxonomic sufficiency (TS). Marine Pollution Bulletin, 40, 98101.
  • McCune, B. & Grace, J.B. (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.
  • Moritz, C., Richardson, K.S., Ferrier, S. et al . (2001) Biogeographical concordance and efficiency of taxon indicators for establishing conservation priority in a tropical rainforest biota. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B,268, 18751881.
  • Oertli, S., Muller, A., Steiner, D., Breitenstein, A. & Dorn, S. (2005) Cross-taxon congruence of species diversity and community similarity among three insect taxa in a mosaic landscape. Biological Conservation, 126, 195205.
  • Oliver, J.C., Prudic, K.L. & Collinge, S.K. (2006) Boulder County Open Space butterfly diversity and abundance. Ecology, 87, 1066.
  • Pawar, S., Koo, M.S., Kelley, C., Ahmed, M.F., Chaudhuri, S. & Sarkar, S. (2007) Conservation assessment and prioritization of areas in northeast India: priorities for amphibians and reptiles. Biological Conservation, 136, 346361.
  • Pik, A.J., Oliver, I. & Beattie, A.J. (1999) Taxonomic sufficiency in ecological studies of terrestrial invertebrates. Australian Journal of Ecology, 24, 555562.
  • R Development Core Team. (2004) r: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  • Rickart, E.A. (2001) Elevational diversity gradients, biogeography and the structure of montane mammal communities in the intermountain region of North America. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 77100.
  • Roemer, H.L. (1972) Forest vegetation and environments of the Saanich Peninsula, Vancouver Island. PhD thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
  • Sergio, F., Newton, I., Marchesi, L. & Pedrini, P. (2006) Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 10491055.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Starzomski, B.M. & Srivastava, D.S. (2007) Landscape geometry determines community response to disturbance. Oikos, 116, 690699.
  • Su, J.C., Debinski, D.M., Jakubauskas, M.E. & Kindscher, K. (2004) Beyond species richness: community similarity as a measure of cross-taxon congruence for coarse-filter conservation. Conservation Biology, 18, 167173.
  • Systat Software (2004) systat for windows, ver. 11. Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA.
  • Thompson, W.L., White, G.C. & Gowan, C. (1998) Monitoring Vertebrate Populations. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Tognelli, M.F. (2005) Assessing the utility of indicator groups for the conservation of South American terrestrial mammals. Biological Conservation, 121, 409417.
  • Tuomisto, H. & Ruokolainen, K. (2006) Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology, 87, 26972708.
  • USEPA (1996a) EMAP Surface Waters Lake Database, 1991–94, Northeast Lakes, Lake Zooplankton Count Data Summarized by Lake. US Environmental Protection Agency, National Health Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • USEPA (1996b) EMAP Surface Waters Lake Database, 1991–94, Northeast Lakes, Breeding Bird Count Data Summarized by Lake. US Environmental Protection Agency, National Health Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Vellend, M. (2004) Parallel effects of land-use history on species diversity and genetic diversity of forest herbs. Ecology, 85, 30433055.
  • World Wildlife Fund (2006) WildFinder: Online Database of Species Distributions, January 2006. http://www.worldwildlife.org/wildfinder
  • Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.