SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, R.P. & Martinez-Meyer, E. (2004) Modeling species’ geographic distributions for preliminary conservation assessments: an implementation with the spiny pocket mice (Heteromys) of Ecuador. Biological Conservation, 116, 167179.
  • Araujo, M.B. & Williams, P.H. (2000) Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data. Biological Conservation, 96, 331345.
  • Augustin, N.H., Cummins, R.P. & French, D.D. (2001) Exploring spatial vegetation dynamics using logistic regression and a multinomial logit model. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 9911006.
  • Austin, M.P. (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling, 157, 101118.
  • Bascompte, J., Possingham, H. & Roughgarden, J. (2002) Patchy populations in stochastic environments: critical number of patches for persistence. American Naturalist, 159, 128137.
  • Bevan, K. (1997) TOPMODEL: a critique. Hydrological Processes, 11, 10691085.
  • Blackstock, T. & Howe, L. (2003) The habitat survey of Wales. Natur Cymru, 6, 48.
  • Buhler, C. & Schmid, B. (2001) The influence of management regime and altitide on the population structure of Succisa pratensis: implications for vegetation monitoring. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 689698.
  • Bulman, C.R. (2001) Conservation Biology of the Marsh Fritillary Butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. University of Leeds, Leeds.
  • Bulman, C.R., Wilson, R., Holt, A.R., Galvez Bravo, L., Early, R.I., Warren, M.S. & Thomas, C.D. (2007) Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt and the conservation of a declining species. Ecological Applications, 17, 14601473.
  • Cabeza, M. & Moilanen, A. (2001) Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 242248.
  • Chambers, J.M. & Hastie, T.J. (1992) Statistical Models in S. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton.
  • Cherrill, A. & McClean, C. (1999) The reliability of ‘Phase 1’ habitat mapping in the UK: the extent and types of observer bias. Landscape and Urban Planning, 45, 131143.
  • Clayden, B. & Hollis, J.M. (1984) Criteria for Differentiating Soil Series. Soil Survey Technical Monograph no. 17. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden.
  • Collingham, Y.C., Wadsworth, R.A., Huntley, B. & Hulme, P.E. (2000) Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, 1327.
  • Cowley, M.J.R., Thomas, C.D., Thomas, J.A. & Warren, M.S. (1999) Flight areas of British butterflies: assessing species status and decline. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 15871592.
  • Debinski, D.M., Jakubauskas, M.E., Kindscher, K., Saveraid, E.H. & Borgognone, M.G. (2002) Predicting meadow communities and species occurrences in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale (eds M.J.Scott, P.J.Heglund & M.L.Morrison). Island Press, Washington.
  • Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G. & Van Dyck, H. (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 19431966.
  • Early, R.I. (2006) Conservation at the Landscape Scale; the Marsh Fritillary and Other British Butterflies. University of York, York.
  • Early, R. & Thomas, C.D. (2007) Multispecies conservation planning: identifying landscapes for the conservation of viable populations using local and continental species priorities. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 253262.
  • Ehrlich, P.R. & Murphy, D.D. (1987) Conservation lessons from long-term studies of checkerspot butterflies. Conservation Biology, 1, 122131.
  • Elith, J. & Burgman, M. (2000) Habitat models for population viability analysis. Population Viability in Plants: Conservation, Management, and Modeling of Rare Plants. Ecological Studies, 165 (eds C.A. Brigham & M.W. Schwartz), pp. 145172. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Eyre, M.D., Rushton, S.P., Luff, M.L. & Telfer, M.G. (2004) Predicting the distribution of ground beetle species (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Britain using land cover variables. Journal of Environmental Management, 72, 163174.
  • Fielding, A.H. & Bell, J.F. (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24, 3849.
  • Fowles, A.P. & Smith, R.G. (2006) Mapping the habitat quality of patch networks for the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Wales. Journal of Insect Conservation, 10, 161177.
  • Gaona, P., Ferreras, P. & Delibes, M. (1998) Dynamics and viability of a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Ecological Monographs, 68, 349370.
  • Gibson, L.A., Wilson, B.A., Cahill, D.M. & Hill, J. (2004) Spatial prediction of rufous bristlebird habitat in a coastal heathland: a GIS-based approach. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 213223.
  • Gilpin, A. (1995) Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Cutting Edge for the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Grafen, A. & Hails, R. (2002) Modern Statistics for the Life Sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Graham, M.H. (2003) Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology, 84, 28092815.
  • Guisan, A. & Thuiller, W. (2005) Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 8, 9931009.
  • Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N.E. (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135, 147186.
  • Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti, O.E., eds (2004) Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.
  • Hanski, I., Kuussaari, M. & Nieminen, M. (1994) Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Ecology, 75, 747762.
  • Hanski, I. & Ovaskainen, O. (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature, 404, 755758.
  • Heglund, P.J. (2001) Foundations of species–environment relations. Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale (eds M.J.Scott, P.J.Heglund & M.L.Morrison). Island Press, Washington.
  • Heikkinen, R.K., Luoto, M., Kuussaari, M. & Poyry, J. (2005) New insights into butterfly–environment relationships using partitioning methods. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 272, 22032210.
  • Heino, M. & Hanski, I. (2001) Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. American Naturalist, 157, 495511.
  • Helm, A., Hanski, I. & Partel, M. (2006) Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecology Letters, 9, 7277.
  • Herben, T., Munzbergova, Z., Milden, M., Ehrlen, J., Cousins, S.A. & Eriksson, O. (2006) Long-term spatial dynamics of Succisa pratensis in a changing rural landscape: linking dynamical modelling with historical maps. Journal of Ecology, 94, 131143.
  • Hokit, D.G., Stith, B., M., Branch, L. & C. (2001) Comparison of two types of metapopulation models in real and artificial landscapes. Conservation Biology, 15, 11021113.
  • Hosmer, D.W. & Lemeshow, S. (2000) Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
  • Ihaka, R. & Gentleman, R. (1996) r: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 299314.
  • Johnson, J.B. & Omland, K.S. (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 101108.
  • Lewis, O.T. & Hurford, C. (1997) Assessing the status of the marsh fritillary butterfly (Eurodryas aurinia): an example from Glamorgan, UK. Journal of Insect Conservation, 1, 159166.
  • Liu, C., Berry, P.M., Dawson, T.P. & Pearson, R.G. (2005) Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography, 28, 385393.
  • Luoto, M., Kuussaari, M., Rita, H., Salminen, J. & Von Bonsdorff, T. (2001) Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded apollo butterfly: a landscape ecological approach. Ecography, 24, 601617.
  • Maes, D., Gilbert, M., Titeux, N., Goffart, P. & Dennis, R.L.H. (2003) Prediction of butterfly hotspots in Belgium: a comparison on statistically focused and land use-focused models. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 19071920.
  • Manel, S., Williams, C. & Ormerod, S.J. (2001) Evaluating presence–absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 921931.
  • Margules, C.R. & Pressey, R.L. (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405, 243253.
  • Meggs, J.M., Munks, S.A., Corkrey, R. & Richards, K. (2004) Development and evaluation of predictive habitat models to assist the conservation planning of a threatened lucanid beetle, Hoplogonus simsoni, in north-east Tasmania. Biological Conservation, 118, 501511.
  • Moilanen, A. & Nieminen, M. (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology, 83, 11311145.
  • Moisen, G.G. & Frescino, T.S. (2002) Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics. Ecological Modelling, 157, 209225.
  • Munzbergova, Z. & Herben, T. (2004) Identification of suitable unoccupied patches in metapopulation studies using co-occurence of species. Oikos, 105, 408414.
  • Petit, S., Chamberlain, D., Haysom, K., Pywell, R., Vickery, J., Warman, L., Allen, D. & Firbank, L. (2003) Knowledge-based models for predicting species occurrence in arable conditions. Ecography, 26, 626640.
  • Posillico, M., Meriggi, A., Pagnin, E., Lovari, S. & Russo, L. (2004) A habitat model for brown bear conservation and land use planning in the central Apennines. Biological Conservation, 118, 141150.
  • Possingham, H., Ball, I. & Andelmann, S. (2000) Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology (eds S.Ferson & M.Burgman), pp. 291306. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Randin, C.F., Dirnbock, T., Dullinger, S., Zimmermann, N.E., Zappa, M. & Guisan, A. (2006) Are niche-based species distribution models transferable in space? Journal of Biogeography, 33, 16891703.
  • Rouget, M., Cowling, R.M., Lombard, A.T., Knight, A.T. & Graham, I.H.K. (2006) Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conservation Biology, 20, 549561.
  • Rushton, S., Sanderson, R., Luff, M. & Fuller, R. (1996) Modelling the spatial dynamics of ground beetles (Carabidae) within landscapes. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 33, 233241.
  • Sarkar, S., Pressey, R.L., Faith, D.P., Margules, C.R., Fuller, T., Stoms, D.M., Moffett, A., Wilson, K.A., Williams, K.J., Williams, P.H. & Andelman, S. (2006) Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 123159.
  • Schtickzelle, N., Choutt, J., Goffart, P., Fichefet, V. & Baguette, M. (2005) Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe. Biological Conservation, 126, 569581.
  • Schtickzelle, N., Mennechez, G. & Baguette, M. (2006) Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology, 87, 10571065.
  • Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N. & Lengauer, T. (2005) ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics, 21, 39403941.
  • Stevens, J.P., Blackstock, T.H., Howe, E.A. & Stevens, D.P. (2004) Repeatability of Phase I habitat survey. Journal of Environmental Management, 73, 5359.
  • Thomas, J.A., Bourn, N.A.D., Clarke, R.T., Stewart, K.E., Simcox, D.J., Pearman, G.S., Curtis, R. & Goodger, B. (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 17911796.
  • Thomas, C.D., Hill, J.K. & Lewis, O.T. (1998) Evolutionary consequences of habitat fragmentation in a localized butterfly. Journal of Animal Ecology, 67, 485497.
  • Tyre, A.J., Tenhumberg, B., Field, S.A., Niejalke, D., Parris, K. & Possingham, H.P. (2003) Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates. Ecological Applications, 13, 17901801.
  • Vaughan, I.P. & Ormerod, S.J. (2005) The continuing challenges of testing species distribution models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 720730.
  • Vos, C.C., Verboom, J., Opdam, P.F.M. & Ter Braak, C.J.F. (2001) Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. American Naturalist, 157, 2441.
  • Wahlberg, N., Klemetti, T. & Hanski, I. (2002) Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography, 25, 224232.
  • Wahlberg, N., Moilanen, A. & Hanski, I. (1996) Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science, 273, 15361538.
  • Wang, R.J., Wang, Y.F., Chen, J.J., Lei, G.C. & Xu, R.M. (2004) Contrasting movement patterns in two species of chequerspot butterflies, Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe, in the same patch network. Ecological Entomology, 29, 367374.
  • Warren, M.S. (1994) The UK status and suspected metapopulation structure of a threatened European butterfly, the marsh fritillary Eurodryas aurinia. Biological Conservation, 67, 239249.
  • Webb, M.R. & Pullin, A.S. (1996) Larval survival in populations of the large copper butterfly Lycaena dispar batavus. Ecography, 19, 279286.
  • Weiss, S.B., Murphy, D.D. & White, R.R. (1988) Sun, slope and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha. Ecology, 69, 14861496.
  • Welk, E. (2004) Constraints in range predictions of invasive plant species due to non-equilibrium distribution patterns: purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America. Ecological Modelling, 179, 551567.
  • Whittingham, M.J., Stephens, P.A., Bradbury, R.B. & Freckleton, R.P. (2006) Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 11821189.
  • Wintle, B.A., Elith, J. & Potts, J.M. (2005) Fauna habitat modelling and mapping: a review and case study in the Lower Hunter Central Coast region of NSW. Austral Ecology, 30, 719738.