SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Reference

  • Anderson, M.J. & Willis, T.J. (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology, 84, 511525.
  • Araujo, M.B., Densham, P.J. & Williams, P.H. (2004) Representing species in reserves from patterns of assemblage diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 10371050.
  • Araujo, M.B., Humphries, C.J., Densham, P.J., Lampinen, R., Hagemeijer, W.J.M., Mitchell-Jones, A.J. & Gasc, J.P. (2001) Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity? Ecography, 24, 103110.
  • Arponen, A., Heikkinen, R.K., Thomas, C.D. & Moilanen, A. (2005) The value of biodiversity in reserve selection: representation, species weighting, and benefit functions. Conservation Biology, 19, 20092014.
  • Belbin, L. (1993) Environmental representativeness – regional partitioning and reserve selection. Biological Conservation, 66, 223230.
  • Bonn, A. & Gaston, K.J. (2005) Capturing biodiversity: selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 10831100.
  • Cabeza, M. (2003) Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design. Ecology Letters, 6, 665672.
  • Elith, J., Graham, C.H., Anderson, R.P., Dudik, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., Hijmans, R.J., Huettmann, F., Leathwick, J.R., Lehmann, A., Li, J., Lohmann, L.G., Loiselle, B.A., Manion, G., Moritz, C., Nakamura, M., Nakazawa, Y., Overton, J.M., Peterson, A.T., Phillips, S.J., Richardson, K., Scachetti-Pereira, R., Schapire, R.E., Soberon, J., Williams, S., Wisz, M.S. & Zimmermann, N.E. (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29, 129151.
  • Faith, D.P. & Walker, P.A. (1996) Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5, 399415.
  • Faith, D.P., Margules, C.R., Walker, P.A., Stein, J. & Natera, G. (2001) Practical application of biodiversity surrogates and percentage targets for conservation in Papua New Guinea. Pacific Conservation Biology, 6, 289303.
  • Faith, D.P., Minchin, P.R. & Belbin, L. (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio, 69, 5768.
  • Ferrier, S. & Guisan, A. (2006) Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 393404.
  • Ferrier, S. (2002) Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? Systematic Biology, 51, 331363.
  • Ferrier, S., Drielsma, M., Manion, G. & Watson, G. (2002) Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. II. Community-level modelling. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 23092338.
  • Ferrier, S., Manion, G., Elith, J. & Richardson, K. (2007) Using generalized dissimilarity modelling to analyse and predict patterns of beta diversity in regional biodiversity assessment. Diversity and Distributions, 13, 252264.
  • Ferrier, S., Powell, G.V.N., Richardson, K.S., Manion, G., Overton, J.M., Allnutt, T.F., Cameron, S.E., Mantle, K., Burgess, N.D., Faith, D.P., Lamoreux, J.F., Kier, G., Hijmans, R.J., Funk, V.A., Cassis, G.A., Fisher, B.L., Flemons, P., Lees, D., Lovett, J.C. & Van Rompaey, R. (2004) Mapping more of terrestrial biodiversity for global conservation assessment. Bioscience, 54, 11011109.
  • Fox, N.J. & Beckley, L.E. (2005) Priority areas for conservation of Western Australian coastal fishes: a comparison of hotspot, biogeographical and complementarity approaches. Biological Conservation, 125, 399410.
  • Gauch, H.G. (1973) Relationship between sample similarity and ecological distance. Ecology, 54, 618622.
  • Global Soil Data Task Group (2000) Global Gridded Surfaces of Selected Soil Characteristics (International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme – Data and Information System) Data Set. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. http://www.daac.ornl.gov .
  • Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. (1986) Generalized additive models. Statistical Science, 1, 297310.
  • Hortal, J. & Lobo, J.M. (2005) An ED-based protocol for optimal sampling of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 29132947.
  • Kirkpatrick, J.B. & Brown, M.J. (1994) A comparison of direct and environmental domain approaches to planning reservation of forest higher-plant communities and species in Tasmania. Conservation Biology, 8, 217224.
  • Legendre, P. & Anderson, M.J. (1999) Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecological Monographs, 69, 124.
  • Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical Ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  • Lesica, P. & Allendorf, F.W. (1995) When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conservation Biology, 9, 753760
  • Moilanen, A. & Kujala, H. (2006) Zonation Spatial Conservation Planning Framework and Software v1·0. User Manual. Edita, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Moilanen, A., Franco, A.M.A., Early, R.I., Fox, R., Wintle, B. & Thomas, C.D. (2005) Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 272, 18851891.
  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853858.
  • NOAA Satellite and Information Service (2007) National Climatic Data Center (Online database). http://lwf.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html.
  • Oksanen, J. (2007) Vegan: Community ecology package for R. R package version 1·8–5.
  • Possingham, H.P., Ball, I.R. & Andelman, S. (2000) Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology (eds S.Ferson & M.Burgman), pp. 291305. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Press, W., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W. & Flannery, B. (1992) Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.J., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. & Williams, P.H. (1993) Beyond opportunism – key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 8, 124128.
  • Pressey, R.L., Watts, M.E. & Barrett, T.W. (2004) Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves. Ecology Letters, 7, 10351046.
  • Resende, M. & Werneck, R. (2006) popstar Software. AT&T Labs Research. http://www.research.att.com/~mgcr/popstar/index.html .
  • Sarkar, S., Justus, J., Fuller, T., Kelley, C., Garson, J. & Mayfield, M. (2005) Effectiveness of environmental surrogates for the selection of conservation area networks. Conservation Biology, 19, 815825.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Michener, C.D. (1958) A statistical method of evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Scientific Bulletin, 28, 14091438.
  • Steinitz, O., Heller, J., Tsoar, A., Rotem, D. & Kadmon, R. (2005) Predicting regional patterns of similarity in species composition for conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 19, 19781988.
  • Trakhtenbrot, A. & Kadmon, R. (2005) Environmental cluster analysis as a tool for selecting complementary networks of conservation sites. Ecological Applications, 15, 335345.
  • Usher, M. (1986) Wildlife Conservation Evaluation. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Williams, P., Hannah, L., Andelman, S., Midgley, G., Araujo, M., Hughes, G., Manne, L., Martinez-Meyer, E. & Pearson, R. (2005) Planning for climate change: identifying minimum-dispersal corridors for the Cape Proteaceae. Conservation Biology, 19, 10631074.
  • Woinarski, J.C.Z., Price, O. & Faith, D.P. (1996) Application of a taxon priority system for conservation planning by selecting areas which are most distinct from environments already reserved. Biological Conservation, 76, 147159.