SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Araújo, M.B. & Williams, P.H. (2000) Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data. Biological Conservation, 96, 331345.
  • Araújo, M.B. & Williams, P.H. (2001) The bias of complementarity hotspots toward marginal populations. Conservation Biology, 15, 17101720.
  • Arnold, H.R. (1993) Atlas of Mammals in Britain. HMSO, London.
  • Arnold, H.R. (1995) Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles in Britain. HMSO, London.
  • Asher, J., Warren, M., Fox, R., Harding, P., Jeffcoate, G. & Jeffcoate, S. (2001) The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Bonn, A., Rodrigues, A.S.L. & Gaston, K.J. (2002) Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale? Ecology Letters, 5, 733741.
  • Branch, W.R., Benn, G.A. & Lombard, A.T. (1995) The tortoises (Testudinidae) and terrapins (Pelomedusidae) of southern Africa: Their diversity, distribution and conservation. South African Journal of Zoology, 30, 91102.
  • Briers, R.A. (2002) Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures. Biological Conservation, 103, 7783.
  • Brooks, T., Balmford, A., Burgess, N., Hansen, L.A., Moore, J., Rahbek, C., Williams, P., Bennun, L.A., Byaruhanga, A., Kasoma, P., Njoroge, P., Pomeroy, D. & Wondafrash, M. (2001) Conservation priorities for birds and biodiversity: do East African Important Bird Areas represent species diversity in other terrestrial vertebrate groups? Ostrich, Suppl. 15, 312.
  • Cabeza, M. & Moilanen, A. (2001) Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 24248.
  • Caro, T.M. & O'Doherty, G. (1999) On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conservation Biology, 13, 80514.
  • Carroll, C., Noss, R.E., Paquet, P.C. & Schumaker, N.H. (2003) Use of population viability analysis and reserve selection algorithms in regional conservation plans. Ecological Applications, 13, 17731789.
  • CBD. (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes. In <http://www.biodiv.org>, pp. 134. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.
  • Cowley, M.J.R., Thomas, C.D., Thomas, J.A. & Warren, M.S. (1999) Flight areas of British butterflies: assessing species status and decline. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 266, 15871592.
  • Cowley, M.J.R., Thomas, C.D., Roy, D.B., Wilson, R.J., Leon-Cortes, J.L., Gutierrez, D., Bulman, C.R., Quinn, R.M., Moss, D. & Gaston, K.J. (2001) Density-distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70, 410425.
  • Early, R.I. & Thomas, C.D. (2007) Multispecies conservation planning: identifying landscapes for the conservation of viable populations using local and continental species priorities. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 253262.
  • Fuller, R.M., Groom, G.B. & Jones, A.R. (1994) The Land Cover Map of Great Britain: an automated classification of Landsat Thermatic Mapper data. Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60, 553562.
  • Gaston, K.J., Rodrigues, A.S.L., Van Rensburg, B.J., Koleff, P. & Chown, S.L. (2001) Complementary representation and zones of ecological transition. Ecology Letters, 4, 49.
  • Gibbons, D.W., Reid, J.B. & Chapman, R.A. (1993) The New Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland: 1988–1991. T & A D Poyser Ltd, London.
  • Gladstone, W. (2002) The potential value of indicator groups in the selection of marine reserves. Biological Conservation, 104, 211220.
  • Hanski, I. (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature, 396, 4149.
  • Hanski, I. & Ovaskainen, O. (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature, 404, 756758.
  • Howard, P.C., Viskanic, P., Davenport, T.R.B., Kigenyi, F.W., Baltzer, M., Dickinson, C.J., Lwanga, J.S., Matthews, R.A. & Balmford, A. (1998) Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature, 394, 472475.
  • Kati, V., Devillers, P., Dufrene, M., Legakis, A., Vokou, D. & Lebrun, P. (2004) Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? Designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 120, 471480.
  • Kremen, C. (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications, 2, 203217.
  • Kremen, C., Cameron, A., Moilanen, A., Phillips, S., Thomas, C.D., Beentje, H., Dransfeld, J., Fisher, B.L., Glaw, F., Good, T.C., Harper, G.J., Hijmans, R.J., Lees, D.C., Jr., E.L., Nussbaum, R.A., Raxworthy, C.J., Razafimpahanana, A., Schatz, G.E., Vences, M., Vieites, D.R., Wright, P.C. & Zjhra, M.L. (2008) Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools. Science, 320, 222226.
  • Lamoreux, J.F., Morrison, J.C., Ricketts, T.H., Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., McKnight, M.W. & Shugart, H.H. (2006) Global tests of biodiversity concordance and the importance of endemism. Nature, 440, 212214.
  • Lawler, J.J., White, D., Sifneos, J.C. & Master, L.L. (2003) Rare species and the use of indicator groups for conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 17, 875882.
  • Margules, C.R. & Pressey, R.L. (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405, 243253.
  • Margules, C.R., Pressey, R.L. & Williams, P.H. (2002) Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. Journal of Biosciences, 27, 30926.
  • Moilanen, A. (2007) Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning. Unifying reserve selection strategies. Biological Conservation, 134, 571579.
  • Moilanen, A. & Kujala, H. (2006) The Zonation Conservation Planning Framework and Software v.1·0. Edita, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Moilanen, A. & Nieminen, M. (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology, 83, 11311145.
  • Moilanen, A., Franco, A.M.A., Early, R.I., Fox, R., Wintle, B. & Thomas, C.D. (2005) Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 272, 18851891.
  • Moore, J.L., Balmford, A., Brooks, T., Burgess, N.D., Hansen, L.A., Rahbek, C. & Williams, P.H. (2003) Performance of sub-Saharan vertebrates as indicator groups for identifying priority areas for conservation. Conservation Biology, 17, 207218.
  • Moritz, C., Richardson, K.S., Ferrier, S., Monteith, G.B., Stanisic, J., Williams, S.E. & Whiffin, T. (2001) Biogeographical concordance and efficiency of taxon indicators for establishing conservation priority in a tropical rainforest biota. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 268, 18751881.
  • Nicholson, E., Westphal, M.I., Frank, K., Rochester, W.A., Pressey, R.L., Lindenmayer, D.B. & Possingham, H.P. (2006) A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. Ecology Letters, 9, 10491060.
  • Pain, D.J. & Pienkowski, M.W. (1997) Farming and Birds in Europe: The Common Agricultural Policy and its Implications for Bird Conservation. 1st edn. Academic Press, London.
  • Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham, B.C. & Gibbons, D.W. (1993) Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature, 365, 33537.
  • Preston, C.D., Pearmanm, D.A. & Dines, T.D., eds. (2002) New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Rodrigues, A.S.L. & Gaston, K.J. (2001) How large do reserve networks need to be? Ecology Letters, 4, 602609.
  • Rodrigues, A.S.L., Ackakaya, H.R., Andelman, S.J., Bakarr, M.I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T.M., Chanson, J.S., Fishpool, L.D.C., Da Fonseca, G.A.B., Gaston, K.J., Hoffmann, M., Marquet, P.A., Pilgrim, J.D., Pressey, R.L., Schipper, J., Sechrest, W., Stuart, S.N., Underhill, L.G., Waller, R.W., Watts, M.E.J. & Yan, X. (2004) Global Gap Analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. Bioscience, 54, 10921100.
  • Rondinini, C. & Boitani, L. (2006) Differences in the umbrella effects of African amphibians and mammals based on two estimators of the area of occupancy. Conservation Biology, 20, 170179.
  • Tognelli, M.F. (2005) Assessing the utility of indicator groups for the conservation of South American terrestrial mammals. Biological Conservation, 121, 409417.
  • Van Jaarsveld, A.S., Freitag, S., Chown, S.L., Muller, C., Koch, S., Hull, H., Bellamy, C., Kruger, M., Endrody-Younga, S., Mansell, M.W. & Scholtz, C.H. (1998) Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science, 279, 21062108.
  • Van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Cabeza, M. & Moilanen, A. (2006) Connectivity, probabilities and persistence: comparing reserve selection strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 899919.
  • Venables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer, New York.
  • Vos, C.C., Berry, P., Opdam, P., Baveco, H., Nijhof, B., O’Hanley, J., Bell, C. & Kuipers, H. (2008) Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45, 17221731.
  • Wernham, C.V., Toms, M.P., Marchant, J.H., Clark, J.A., Siriwardena, G.M. & Baillie, S.R., eds. (2002) The Migration Atlas: Movements of the Birds of Britain and Ireland. T. & A.D. Poyser, London.
  • Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C. & Pressey, R. (1996) A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology, 10, 155174.