SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aarts, G., Mackenzie, M., McConnell, B., Fedak, M. & Mattiopoulos, J. (2008) Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data. Ecography, 31, 140160.
  • Agresti, A. (2002) Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • Apps, C.D. & McLellan, B.N. (2006) Factors influencing dispersion and fragmentation of endangered mountain caribou populations. Biological Conservation, 130, 8497.
  • Bishop, J., Die, D. & Wang, Y.-G. (2000) A generalized estimating equations approach for analysis of the impact of new technology on a trawl fishery. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 42, 159177.
  • Bolker, B.B., Brooks, M.E., Clark, C.J., Geange, S.W., Poulsen, J.R., Stevens, M.H.H. & White, J.S. (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 127135.
  • Boyce, M.A. (2006) Scale for resource selection functions. Diversity and Distributions, 12, 269276.
  • Boyce, M.A., Vernier, P.R., Nielsen, S.E., & Schmiegelow, F.K.A. (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling, 157, 281300.
  • Brown, G.S., Rettie, W.J., Brooks, R.J. & Mallory, F.F. (2007) Predicting the impacts of forest management on woodland caribou habitat suitability in black spruce boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 245, 137147.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (1998) Model Selection and Inference; A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Clifford, P., Richardson, S. & Hémon, D. (1989) Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics, 45, 123134.
  • COSEWIC (2002) COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Crichton, V. & Duncan, J. (2005) Manitoba's Conservation and Recovery Strategy for Boreal Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) Government of Manitoba.
  • Cushman, S.A., Chase, M. & Griffin, C. (2005) Elephants in space and time. Oikos, 109, 331341.
  • Dorman, C.F., McPherson, J.M., Araújo, M.B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., Davies, R.G., Hirzel, A. Jetz, W., Kissling, W.D., Kühn, I., Ohlemüller, R., Peres-Neto, P.R., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Schurr, F.M. & Wilson, R. (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography, 30, 609628.
  • Driscoll, M.J.L., Donovan, T., Mickey, R., Howard, A. & Fleming, K.K. (2005) Determinants of wood thrush nest success: a multi-scale, model selection approach. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 699709.
  • Duncan, R.P. (2004) Extinction and endemism in the New Zealand avifauna. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 13, 509517.
  • Fitzmaurice, G.M., Laird, N.M. & Ware, J.H. (2004) Applied Longitudinal Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
  • Fortin, D., Beyer, H.L., Boyce, M.S., Smith, D.W., Duchesne, T. & Mao, J.S. (2005) Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 86, 13201330.
  • Gillies, C.S., Hebblewhite, M., Nielsen, S.E., Krawchuk, M.A., Aldridge, C.L., Frair, J.L., Saher, D.J., Stevens, C.E. & Jerde, C.L. (2006) Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 887898.
  • Gustine, D.D., Parker, K.L., Lay, R.J., Gillingham, M.P. & Herd, D.C. (2006) Interpreting resource selection at different scales for woodland caribou in winter. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 16021614.
  • Hardin, J.W. & Hilbe, J.M. (2003) Generalized Estimating Equations. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • Jerde, C.L. & Visscher, D.R. (2005) GPS measurement error influences on movement model parameterization. Ecological Applications, 15, 806810.
  • Johnson, C.J. & Gillingham, M.P. (2005) An evaluation of mapped species distribution models used for conservation planning. Environmental Conservation, 32, 117128.
  • Johnson, C.J., Seip, D.R. & Boyce, M.S. (2004) A quantitative approach to conservation planning: using resource selection functions to map the distribution of mountain caribou at multiple spatial scales. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 238251.
  • Johnson, C.J., Nielsen, S.E., Merrill, E.H., McDonald, T.L. & Boyce, M.S. (2006) Resource selection functions based on use-availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 347357.
  • Keating, K.A. & Cherry, S. (2004) Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat selection studies. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68, 774789.
  • Lele, S.R. & Keim, J.L. (2006) Weighted distributions and estimation of resource selection probability functions. Ecology, 87, 30213028.
  • Linke, J., Franklin, S.E., Huettmann, F. & Stenhouse, G.B. (2005) Seismic cutlines, changing landscape metrics and grizzly bear land use in Alberta. Landscape Ecology, 20, 811826.
  • Manly, B.F., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L. & Erickson, W.P. (2002) Resource Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies. 2nd edn. Kluwer, New York.
  • Mayor, S.J., Schaeffer, J.A., Schneider, D.C. & Mahoney, S.P. (2007) Spectrum of selection: new approaches to detecting the scale-dependent response to habitat. Ecology, 88, 16341640.
  • Nielsen, S.E., Boyce, M.S., Stenhouse, G.B. & Munro, R.H.M. (2002) Modelling grizzly bear habitat in the yellowhead ecosystem of Alberta: taking autocorrelation seriously. Ursus, 13, 4556.
  • Overall, J.E. & Tonidandel, S. (2004) Robustness of generalized estimating equation (GEE) tests of significance against misspecification of the error structure model. Biometrical Journal, 46, 203213.
  • Pan, W. (2001) Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics, 57, 120125.
  • Pearce, J.L. & Boyce, M.S. (2006) Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 405412.
  • Pendergast, J.F., Gange, S.J., Newton, M.A., Lindstrom, M.J., Palta, M. & Fisher, M.R. (1996) A survey of methods of analyzing clustered binary response data. International Statistical Review, 64, 89118.
  • Pepe, M.S. & Anderson, G.L. (1994) A cautionary note on inference for marginal regression models with longitudinal data and general correlated response data. Communications in Satistics – Simulation and Computation, 23, 939951.
  • Saher, D.J. (2005) Woodland caribou habitat selection during winter and along migratory routes in west-central Alberta. MSc Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AL, Canada.
  • SAS Institute Inc. (2003) The SAS System for Windows Version 9.1. Cary, NC, USA.
  • SAS Institute Inc. (2006) The GLIMMIX Procedure. Cary, NC, USA.
  • Storch, I. (2002) On spatial resolution in habitat models: can small-scale forest structure explain capercaillie numbers? Conservation Ecology, 6, 631.
  • Way, J.G., Ortega, I.M. & Strauss, E.G. (2004) Movement and activity patterns of eastern 12 coyotes in a coastal, suburban environment. Northeastern Naturalist, 11, 237254.
  • Wu, Y.B., Clopper, R.R. & Wooldridge, P.J. (1999) A comparison of traditional approaches to hierarchical linear modeling when analyzing longitudinal data. Research in Nursing and Health, 22, 421432.
  • Zorn, C.J.W. (2001) Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data: a review with applications. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 470490.