Marine renewable energy: potential benefits to biodiversity? An urgent call for research

Authors

  • Richard Inger,

    1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation and Peninsula Research Institute for Marine Renewable Energy (PRIMaRE), School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus. Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Martin J. Attrill,

    1. Marine Biology & Ecology Research Centre, PRIMaRE and Marine Institute, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stuart Bearhop,

    1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation and Peninsula Research Institute for Marine Renewable Energy (PRIMaRE), School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus. Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Annette C. Broderick,

    1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation and Peninsula Research Institute for Marine Renewable Energy (PRIMaRE), School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus. Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • W. James Grecian,

    1. Marine Biology & Ecology Research Centre, PRIMaRE and Marine Institute, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • David J. Hodgson,

    1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation and Peninsula Research Institute for Marine Renewable Energy (PRIMaRE), School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus. Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Cheryl Mills,

    1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation and Peninsula Research Institute for Marine Renewable Energy (PRIMaRE), School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus. Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Emma Sheehan,

    1. Marine Biology & Ecology Research Centre, PRIMaRE and Marine Institute, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stephen C. Votier,

    1. Marine Biology & Ecology Research Centre, PRIMaRE and Marine Institute, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Matthew J. Witt,

    1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation and Peninsula Research Institute for Marine Renewable Energy (PRIMaRE), School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus. Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Brendan J. Godley

    Corresponding author
    1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation and Peninsula Research Institute for Marine Renewable Energy (PRIMaRE), School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus. Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

*Correspondence author. E-mail: b.j.godley@exeter.ac.uk

Summary

1. The evidence for anthropogenically induced climate change is overwhelming with the production of greenhouse gases from burning fossil fuels being a key driver. In response, many governments have initiated programmes of energy production from renewable sources.

2. The marine environment presents a relatively untapped energy source and offshore installations are likely to produce a significant proportion of future energy production. Wind power is the most advanced, with development of wave and tidal energy conversion devices expected to increase worldwide in the near future.

3. Concerns over the potential impacts on biodiversity of marine renewable energy installations (MREI) include: habitat loss, collision risks, noise and electromagnetic fields. These factors have been posited as having potentially important negative environmental impacts.

4. Conversely, we suggest that if appropriately managed and designed, MREI may increase local biodiversity and potentially benefit the wider marine environment. Installations have the capacity to act as both artificial reefs and fish aggregation devices, which have been used previously to facilitate restoration of damaged ecosystems, and de facto marine-protected areas, which have proven successful in enhancing both biodiversity and fisheries.

5. The deployment of MREI has the potential to cause conflict among interest groups including energy companies, the fishing sector and environmental groups. Conflicts should be minimized by integrating key stakeholders into the design, siting, construction and operational phases of the installations, and by providing clear evidence of their potential environmental benefits.

6.Synthesis and applications. MREI have the potential to be both detrimental and beneficial to the environment but the evidence base remains limited. To allow for full biodiversity impacts to be assessed, there exists an urgent need for additional multi and inter-disciplinary research in this area ranging from engineering to policy. Whilst there are a number of factors to be considered, one of the key decisions facing current policy makers is where installations should be sited, and, dependent upon site, whether they should be designed to either minimize negative environmental impacts or as facilitators of ecosystem restoration.

Ancillary