SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adriaens, D., Honnay, O. & Hermy, M. (2006) No evidence of a plant extinction debt in highly fragmented calcareous grasslands in Belgium. Biological Conservation, 133, 212224.
  • Balmer, O. & Erhardt, A. (2000) Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for central European butterfly communities: rethinking conservation practices. Conservation Biology, 14, 746757.
  • Bauerfeind, S.S., Theisen, A. & Fischer, K. (2009) Patch occupancy in the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle in a fragmented landscape: effects of habitat quality, patch size and isolation. Journal of Insect Conservation, 13, 271277.
  • Benton, T.G., Vickery, J.A. & Wilson, J.D. (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 182188.
  • Bisteau, E. & Mahy, G. (2005) Vegetation and seed bank in a calcareous grassland restored from a pinus forest. Applied Vegetation Science, 8, 167174.
  • Böhmer, H.J. (1994) Die Halbtrockenrasen der Fränkischen Alb – Strukturen, Prozesse, Erhaltung. Mitteilungen der Fränkischen Geographischen Gesellschaft, 41, 323343.
  • Boughton, D.A. (1999) Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation. Ecology, 80, 27272739.
  • Bruun, H.H. (2000) Patterns of species richness in dry grassland patches in an agricultural landscape. Ecography, 23, 641650.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer Press, NY, New York, USA.
  • Colwell, R.K. (2006) EstimateS: statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples, Version 8. Persistent URL: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
  • Cozzi, G., Müller, C.B. & Krauss, J. (2008) How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands? Landscape Ecology, 23, 269283.
  • Debinski, D.M. & Holt, R.D. (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology, 14, 342355.
  • Dennis, R.L.H. & Eales, H.T. (1999) Probability of site occupancy in the large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia determined from geographical and ecological data. Biological Conservation, 87, 295301.
  • Dover, J. & Settele, J. (2009) The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. Journal of Insect Conservation, 13, 327.
  • ESRI (1995) ArcView GIS for Windows, version 3.2. ESRI, Redlands, CA.
  • Ewers, R.M. & Didham, R.K. (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews, 81, 117142.
  • Fagan, W.F., Cantrell, R.S. & Cosner, C. (1999) How habitat edges change species interactions. The American Naturalist, 153, 165182.
  • Fahrig, L. (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 34, 487515.
  • Fletcher, R.J., Ries, L., Battin, J. & Chalfoun, A.D. (2007) The role of habitat area and edge in fragmented landscapes: definitely distinct or inevitably intertwined? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 85, 10171030.
  • Gerstberger, P. & Vollrath, H. (2007) Flora Nordostbayerns – Verbreitungsatlas der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen – Zwischenbericht 2006. Beihefte zu den Berichtsbänden der Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft Bayreuth, 6, 1273.
  • Hambäck, P.A., Summerville, K.S., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Krauss, J., Englund, G. & Crist, T.O. (2007) Habitat specialization, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density-area relationships in a cross-continental comparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 83688373.
  • Hanski, I. (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 151162.
  • Hanski, I., Moilanen, A. & Gyllenberg, M. (1996) Minimum viable metapopulation size. American Naturalist, 147, 527541.
  • Hanski, I. & Thomas, C. (1994) Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biological Conservation, 68, 167180.
  • Helm, A., Hanski, I. & Pärtel, M. (2006) Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecology Letters, 9, 7277.
  • Jacquemyn, H., Brys, R. & Hermy, M. (2003) Short-term effects of different management regimes on the response of calcareous grassland vegetation to increased nitrogen. Biological Conservation, 111, 137147.
  • Kindlmann, P. & Burel, F. (2008) Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecology, 23, 879890.
  • Krauss, J., Alfert, T. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2009) Habitat area but not habitat age determines wild bee richness in limestone quarries. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 194202.
  • Krauss, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. (2003) How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies? Journal of Biogeography, 30, 889900.
  • Krauss, J., Klein, A.M., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. (2004) Effects of habitat area, isolation, and landscape diversity on plant species richness of calcareous grasslands. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 14271439.
  • Krebs, J.R., Wilson, J.D., Bradbury, R.B. & Siriwardena, G.M. (1999) The second silent spring? Nature, 400, 611612.
  • Kuussaari, M., Heliölä, J., Luoto, M. & Pöyry, J. (2007) Determinants of local species richness of diurnal Lepidoptera in boreal agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 122, 366376.
  • Kuussaari, M., Bommarco, R., Heikkinen, R.K., Helm, A., Krauss, J., Lindborg, R. et al. (2009) Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 564571.
  • Laurance, W.F. & Yensen, E. (1991) Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation, 55, 7792.
  • Lindborg, R. & Eriksson, O. (2004) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology, 85, 18401845.
  • Matisziw, T.C. & Murray, A.T. (2009) Connectivity change in habitat networks. Landscape Ecology, 24, 89100.
  • Moilanen, A. & Nieminen, M. (2002) Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology, 83, 11311145.
  • Naumann, C.M., Tarmann, G.M. & Tremewan, W.G. (1999) The Western Palaearctic Zygaenidae. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, Denmark.
  • Öckinger, E. (2006) Possible metapopulation structure of the threatened butterfly Pyrgus armoricanus in Sweden. Journal of Insect Conservation, 10, 4351.
  • Öckinger, E. & Smith, H.G. (2006) Landscape composition and habitat area affects butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia, 149, 526534.
  • Oksanen, J. (2009) Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities in R: Vegan Tutorial. URL:http://cran.r-project.org.
  • Ouin, A., Sarthou, J.P., Bouyjou, B., Deconchat, M., Lacombe, J.P. & Monteil, C. (2006) The species-area relationship in the hoverfly (Diptera, Syrphidae) communities of forest fragments in southern France. Ecography, 29, 183190.
  • Petit, S., Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. & Baguette, M. (2001) Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. Oikos, 92, 491500.
  • Pollard, E. (1977) A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies. Biological Conservation, 12, 115134.
  • Pöyry, J., Paukkunen, J., Heliöla, J. & Kuussaari, M. (2009) Relative contributions of local and regional factors to species richness and abundance of butterflies and moths in semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia, 160, 577587.
  • R Development Core Team (2004) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.r-project.org.
  • Raatikainen, K., Heikkinen, R.K. & Pykälä, J. (2007) Impacts of local and regional factors on vegetation of boreal semi-natural grasslands. Plant Ecology, 189, 155173.
  • Ries, L. & Sisk, T.D. (2008) Butterfly edge effects are predicted by a simple model in a complex landscape. Oecologia, 156, 7586.
  • Ries, L., Fletcher, R.J., Battin, J. & Sisk, T. (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35, 491522.
  • Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N. & Fownes, S. (2000) Alpine parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology, 81, 16421653.
  • Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995) Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Rothmaler, W. (1999) Exkursionsflora von Deutschland, Band 2-4. Spektrum Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, Deutschland.
  • Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J. & Margules, C.R. (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation – a review. Conservation Biology, 5, 1832.
  • Settele, J., Steiner, R., Reinhardt, R. & Feldmann, R. (2005) Schmetterlinge, die Tagfalter Deutschlands. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
  • Stefanescu, C., Herrando, S. & Paramo, F. (2004) Butterfly species richness in the north-west Mediterranean Basin: the role of natural and human-induced factors. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 905915.
  • Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. (2000) Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitats. Ecology Letters, 3, 449456.
  • Stettmer, C., Bräu, M., Gros, P. & Wanninger, O. (2007) Die Tagfalter Bayerns und Österreichs. Bayerische Akademie für Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege, Laufen, Deutschland.
  • Sutherland, W.J., Armstrong-Brown, S., Armsworth, P.R., Brereton, T., Brickland, J., Campbell, C.D. et al. (2006) The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 617627.
  • Thomas, J.A., Bourn, NAD, Clarke, R.T., Stewart, K.E., Simcox, D.J., Pearman, G.S. et al. (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 268, 17911796.
  • WallisDeVries, M.F., Poschlod, P. & Willems, J.H. (2002) Challenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in Northwestern Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna. Biological Conservation, 104, 265273.
  • Warren, M.S., Hill, J.K., Thomas, J.A., Asher, J., Huntley, B., Roy, D.B. et al. (2001) Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature, 414, 6569.
  • Weidemann, H.J. (1995) Tagfalter beobachten, bestimmen. Naturbuch Verlag, Augsburg, Deutschland.
  • Wessels, S., Eichberg, C., Storm, C. & Schwabe, A. (2008) Do plant-community-based grazing regimes lead to epizoochorous dispersal of high proportions of target species? Flora, 203, 304326.
  • Westphal, C., Bommarco, R., Carre, G., Lamborn, E., Morison, N., Petanidou, T. et al. (2008) Measuring bee diversity in different European habitats and biogeographical regions. Ecological Monographs, 78, 653671.
  • Wettstein, W. & Schmid, B. (1999) Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: effect of altitude, habitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppers. Journal of Applied Ecology, 36, 363373.
  • Wilcox, B.A., Murphy, D.D., Ehrlich, P.R. & Austin, G.T. (1986) Insular biogeography of the montane butterfly faunas in the Great-Basin – comparison with birds and mammals. Oecologia, 69, 188194.
  • Winfree, R., Dushoff, J., Crone, E.E., Schultz, C.B., Budny, R.V., Williams, N.M. & Kremen, C. (2005) Testing simple indices of habitat proximity. American Naturalist, 165, 707717.
  • Zschokke, S., Dolt, C., Rusterholz, H.P., Oggier, P., Braschler, B., Thommen, G.H. et al. (2000) Short-term responses of plants and invertebrates to experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation. Oecologia, 125, 559572.