Independent effects of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and structural connectivity on the distribution of two arboreal rodents

Authors

  • Alessio Mortelliti,

    Corresponding author
    1. CNR-Institute for Ecosystem Studies, c/o Department of Animal and Human Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185, Rome, Italy
    2. Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185, Rome, Italy
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Giovanni Amori,

    1. CNR-Institute for Ecosystem Studies, c/o Department of Animal and Human Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185, Rome, Italy
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dario Capizzi,

    1. Arp, Regional Park Agency, via del Pescaccio 96, 00166 Rome, Italy
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Cristina Cervone,

    1. Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185, Rome, Italy
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stefano Fagiani,

    1. Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185, Rome, Italy
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Barbara Pollini,

    1. Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185, Rome, Italy
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Luigi Boitani

    1. Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Charles Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185, Rome, Italy
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence author. E-mail: alessio.mortelliti@uniroma1.it

Summary

1. Habitat loss must be distinguished from habitat fragmentation so that appropriate conservation management can be applied. Few studies have evaluated the independent effects of habitat loss and habitat fragmentation on the distribution of vertebrates, and none has evaluated the independent effect of changes in structural connectivity. We carried out a landscape-scale experiment to assess the independent contribution of these three processes and to examine what landscape scale factors affect the distribution of two forest-dependent arboreal rodents: the hazel dormouse Muscardinus avellanarius and the red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris.

2. Habitat loss, rather than habitat fragmentation per se, was the major driver of distribution patterns for both species. As predicted, structural connectivity (hedgerow networks) played an important role in determining the distribution of the hazel dormouse, but not of the red squirrel.

3. Our models predict that long lengths of hedgerows (>30 km) are unlikely to increase the probability of occurrence of hazel dormouse in landscapes where there are low levels of forest cover (<5%–10%).

4.Synthesis and applications. Our empirical findings indicate that structural connectivity and habitat loss may have additive effects on vertebrate distribution. For the hazel dormouse, improving structural connectivity will be ineffective if the amount of forest cover in the landscape is less than 5–10%. The key message from this study is that resources should not be invested in landscape linkages until their efficacy for the given level of suitable habitat has been assessed.

Ancillary