Cost-effectiveness of plant and animal biodiversity indicators in tropical forest and agroforest habitats

Authors

  • Michael Kessler,

    Corresponding author
    1. Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
    2. Systematic Botany, University of Zürich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stefan Abrahamczyk,

    1. Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
    2. Systematic Botany, University of Zürich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland
    3. Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Merijn Bos,

    1. Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    2. Louis Bolk Institute, Hoofdstraat 24, 3972 LA Driebergen, the Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Damayanti Buchori,

    1. Faculty of Biology, Bogor Agricultural University, Jalan Padjajaran, 16144 Bogor, Indonesia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dadang Dwi Putra,

    1. Celebes Bird Club, c/o Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Zoologi, Puslitbang Biologi – LIPI, Jl. Raya Bogor Jakarta Km 46, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • S. Robbert Gradstein,

    1. Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Patrick Höhn,

    1. Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jürgen Kluge,

    1. Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
    2. Faculty of Geography, University of Marburg, Deutschhausstraße 10, 35032 Marburg, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Friederike Orend,

    1. Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ramadhaniel Pitopang,

    1. Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Shahabuddin Saleh,

    1. Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, Palu, Indonesia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Christian H. Schulze,

    1. Department of Animal Biodiversity, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Simone G. Sporn,

    1. Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter,

    1. Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    2. Department of Animal Ecology I, University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstrasse 30, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sri S. Tjitrosoedirdjo,

    1. Faculty of Biology, Bogor Agricultural University, Jalan Padjajaran, 16144 Bogor, Indonesia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Teja Tscharntke

    1. Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author

Correspondence author. E-mail: michael.kessler@systbot.uzh.ch

Summary

1. Biodiversity data are needed for conservation and management of tropical habitats, but the high diversity of these ecosystems makes comprehensive surveys prohibitively expensive and indicator taxa reflecting the biodiversity patterns of other taxa are frequently used. Few studies have produced the necessary comprehensive data sets to assess the quality of the indicator groups, however, and only one previous study has considered the monetary costs involved in sampling them.

2. We surveyed four plant groups (herbs, liverworts, trees, lianas) and eight animal groups (ants, canopy and dung beetles, birds, butterflies, bees, wasps and the parasitoids of the latter two) in 15 plots of 50 × 50 m2 each, representing undisturbed rainforest and two types of cacao agroforest in Sulawesi, Indonesia. We calculated three biodiversity measures (α and β diversity; percentage of species indicative of habitat conditions), built simple and multiple regression models among species groups (single groups, combinations of 2–11 groups, averaged relative diversity of all 12 groups), and related these to three measures of survey cost (absolute costs and two approaches correcting for different sampling intensities).

3. Determination coefficients (R2 values) of diversity patterns between single study groups were generally low (<0·25), while the consideration of several study groups increased R2 values to up to 0·8 for combinations of four groups, and to almost 1·0 for combinations of 11 groups. Survey costs varied 10-fold between study groups, but their cost-effectiveness (indicator potential versus monetary cost) varied strongly depending on the biodiversity aspect taken into account (α or β diversity, single or multiple groups, etc.).

4.Synthesis and applications. We found that increasing the number of taxa resulted in best overall biodiversity indication. We thus propose that the most cost-efficient approach to general tropical biodiversity inventories is to increase taxonomic coverage by selecting taxa with the lowest survey costs.

Ancillary