1365-2664/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=8b608cc23970983efcf0bf9354181123ee4feba9)
1365-2664/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=01405a21098d64198820bdbe2e30807b513e69f2)
Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?
Article first published online: 7 JUN 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Gibbons, J. M., Nicholson, E., Milner-Gulland, E. J. and Jones, J. P. G. (2011), Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results?. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48: 1218–1226. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02022.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 SEP 2011
- Article first published online: 7 JUN 2011
- Received 25 March 2010; accepted 16 May 2011 Handling Editor: Paul Armsworth
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Supporting Information
- Cited By
Appendix S1. Agency budget, distribution of patch properties and landscape level gain.
Appendix S2. Implementation and optimal solution.
Fig. S1. Proportion of managers joining a PES scheme (blue = all, red = none) structured by action or results, depending on the background distribution of service provision (skew of P0).
Fig. S2. Proportion of agency budget spent on monitoring at the landscape level structured by action or results, depending on the background distribution of service provision (skew of P0) with a = 1.
Fig. S3. The optimal multiplier (x) of action cost (CL=1) to maximise mean service gain at the landscape level structured by action or results, depending on the background distribution of service provision (skew of P0) with a = 1.
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
| Filename | Format | Size | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPE_2022_sm_AppS1-S2-FigsS1-S3.doc | 171K | Supporting info item |
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.