Do time-lagged extinctions and colonizations change the interpretation of buffer strip effectiveness? – a study of riparian bryophytes in the first decade after logging
Version of Record online: 2 NOV 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society
Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume 49, Issue 6, pages 1316–1324, December 2012
How to Cite
Hylander, K., Weibull, H. (2012), Do time-lagged extinctions and colonizations change the interpretation of buffer strip effectiveness? – a study of riparian bryophytes in the first decade after logging. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49: 1316–1324. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02218.x
- Issue online: 29 NOV 2012
- Version of Record online: 2 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 13 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Received: 15 AUG 2012
- Stiftelsen Carl-Fredrik von Horns fond
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Appendix S1. Results from linear mixed-effect models.
Appendix S2. Number of records (in 1000 m2 plots), mean frequency (in the plots were it occurred; 1–5), and trajectory category of each species/taxa in clear-cuts (N = 13), buffer strips (N = 13), and references (N = 9) in 1998 (pre-logging), 2001 (2·5 years after cutting), and 2009 (10·5 years after cutting).
Appendix S3. Change in occupancy vs. change in local frequency (i.e. the number of recorded sub-plots in plots where it was found) for clear-cuts (a and b), buffer strips (c and d) and references (e and f).
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.