SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Araújo, M.B., Densham, P.J., Lampinen, R., Hagemeijer, W.J.M., Mitchell-Jones, A.J., Gasc, J.P. & Humphries, C.J. (2001) Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity? Ecography, 24, 103110.
  • Araújo, M.B., Densham, P.J. & Humphries, C.J. (2003) Predicting species diversity with ED: the quest for evidence. Ecography, 26, 380383.
  • Araújo, M.B., Densham, P.J. & Williams, P.H. (2004) Representing species in reserves from patterns of assemblage diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 114.
  • Belbin, L. (1994) patn software package. CSIRO, Canberra.
  • Brooks, T.M., da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Rodrigues, A.S.L. (2004) Protected areas and species. Conservation Biology, 18, 616618.
  • Condit, R., Pitman, N., Leigh, E.G. Jr, Chave, J., Terborgh, J., Foster, R.B., Núñez, P., Aguilar, S., Valencia, R., Villa, G., Muller-Landau, H.C., Losos, E. & Hubbell, S.P. (2002) Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science, 295, 666669.
  • Duivenvoorden, J.F., Svenning, J.C. & Wright, S.J. (2002) Beta diversity in tropical forests. Science, 295, 636637.
  • Faith, D.P. (1994) Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 345, 4558.
  • Faith, D.P. (1995) Biodiversity and regional sustainability analysis. CSIRO, Canberra.
  • Faith, D.P. (1996) On methods for evaluating alternative surrogates for regional biodiversity assessments. Report to Department of Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra. http://www.amonline.net.au/systematics/pdf/complementarity.pdf.
  • Faith, D.P. (2003a) Biodiversity. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2003 Edition) (ed. by E.N.Zalta) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/biodiversity/.
  • Faith, D.P. (2003b) Environmental diversity (ED) as surrogate information for species-level biodiversity. Ecography, 26, 374379.
  • Faith, D.P. (2004) From species to supertrees: Popperian corroboration and some current controversies in systematics. Australian Systematic Botany, 17, 116.
  • Faith, D.P., Carter, G., Cassis, G., Ferrier, S. & Wilkie, L. (2003) Complementarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algorithms for conservation. Environmental Science and Policy, 6, 311328.
  • Faith, D.P. & Ferrier, S. (2002a) Linking beta diversity, environmental variation, and biodiversity assessment. Science, 296 [Online] (22 July 2002), http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/eletters/295/5555/636504.
  • Faith, D.P. & Ferrier, S. (2002b) Linking species-compositional dissimilarities and environmental data for biodiversity assessment. Available at: http://www.amonline.net.au/systematics/faith_linking.htm.
  • Faith, D.P., Reid, C.A.M. & Hunter, J. (2004) Integrating Phylogenetic Diversity, Complementarity, and Endemism. Conservation Biology, 18, 255261.
  • Faith, D.P. & Trueman, J. (2001) Towards an inclusive philosophy for phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology, 50, 331350.
  • Faith, D.P. & Walker, P.A. (1993) diversity: a software package for sampling phylogenetic and environmental diversity. Reference and user's guide. v. 1.0. CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra.
  • Faith, D.P. & Walker, P.A. (1994) diversity: a software package for sampling phylogenetic and environmental diversity. Reference and user's guide. v. 2.1. CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra.
  • Faith, D.P. & Walker, P.A. (1996a) How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas? On hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches. Biodiversity Letters, 3, 1825.
  • Faith, D.P. & Walker, P.A. (1996b) Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5, 399415.
  • Faith, D.P. & Walker, P.A. (1996c) Integrating conservation and development: incorporating vulnerability into biodiversity-assessment of areas. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5, 431446.
  • Faith, D.P., Minchin, P.R. & Belbin, L. (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio, 69, 5768.
  • Ferrier, S. (2002) Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to go from? Systematic Biology, 51, 331363.
  • Ferrier, S. & Watson, G. (1997) An evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental surrogates and modelling techniques in predicting the distribution of biological diversity. Report produced for the Department of Environment, Sports and Territories, Australia.
  • Ferrier, S., Drielsma, M., Manion, G. & Watson, G. (2002) Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. II. Community-level modelling. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 23092338.
  • Hull, D.L. (1999) The use and abuse of Sir Karl Popper. Biology and Philosophy, 14, 481504.
  • Lund, M. & Rahbek, C. (2002) Cross-taxon congruence in complementarity and conservation of temperate biodiversity. Animal Conservation, 5, 163171.
  • Margules, C.R. & Pressey, R.L. (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405, 243253.
  • Minchin, P.R. (1987) An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio, 69, 89107.
  • Sarkar, S. & Margules, C.R. (2002) Operationalizing biodiversity for conservation planning. Journal of Biosciences, 27, 299308.
  • Wilson, E.O. (ed.) (1988) Biodiversity. National Academy of Sciences/Smithsonian Institution, Washington.