Lizard habitat partitioning on islands: the interaction of local and landscape scales
Article first published online: 25 OCT 2005
Journal of Biogeography
Volume 32, Issue 12, pages 2113–2121, December 2005
How to Cite
Buckley, L. B. and Roughgarden, J. (2005), Lizard habitat partitioning on islands: the interaction of local and landscape scales. Journal of Biogeography, 32: 2113–2121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01340.x
- Issue published online: 25 OCT 2005
- Article first published online: 25 OCT 2005
- Altitudinal gradient;
- environmental gradient;
- habitat partitioning;
- Lesser Antilles;
- landscape scale;
- local scale;
- thermal physiology
Aim This study addresses how species resolve environmental differences into biological habitats at multiple, interacting spatial scales. How do patterns of local habitat use change along an elevation gradient? How do patterns of local habitat partitioning interact with partitioning at a landscape scale?
Location Northern and southern Lesser Antilles islands, West Indies.
Methods We document how Anolis Daudin, 1802 lizards partition habitat locally at sites along a landscape-scale elevation gradient. We examine habitat partitioning both with and without interspecific interactions in the predominately flat northern Lesser Antilles islands and in the more mountainous southern islands.
Results Anoles partition local habitat along perch-height and microclimate axes. Northern-group sympatric anoles partition local habitat by perch height and have overlapping distributions at the landscape scale. Southern-group sympatric anoles partition local habitat by microclimate and specialize in particular habitats at the landscape scale. In both the northern and southern groups, species use different perch heights and microclimates only in areas of species overlap along the elevation gradient.
Main conclusions We demonstrate the interaction between local- and landscape-scale habitat partitioning. In the case of microclimate partitioning, the interaction results from the use of thermal physiology to partition habitat at multiple scales. This interaction prompts the question of whether habitat partitioning developed ‘local-out’ or ‘landscape-in’. We pose this dichotomy and present a framework for its resolution.