Biogeographical comparison of the arthropod herbivore communities associated with Lepidium draba in its native, expanded and introduced ranges

Authors

  • Michael G. Cripps,

    Corresponding author
    1. Division of Entomology, Department of Plant Soil and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339, USA
      *Michael G. Cripps, Field Service Centre, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.
      E-mail: crippsm2@lincoln.ac.nz
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mark Schwarzländer,

    1. Division of Entomology, Department of Plant Soil and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jessica L. McKenney,

    1. Division of Entomology, Department of Plant Soil and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Hariet L. Hinz,

    1. CABI Bioscience, Switzerland Centre, 1 Rue des Grillons, Delémont CH-2800, Switzerland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • William J. Price

    1. Statistical Programs, College of Agriculture, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2337, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

*Michael G. Cripps, Field Service Centre, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.
E-mail: crippsm2@lincoln.ac.nz

Abstract

Aim  To examine the composition and structure of the arthropod community on the invasive weed Lepidium draba in its native, expanded and introduced ranges, in order to elucidate the lack of a biotic constraint that may facilitate invasion.

Location  Europe and western North America.

Methods  Identical sampling protocols were used to collect data from a total of 35 populations of L. draba in its native (Eastern European), expanded (Western European) and introduced (western US) ranges. A bootstrapping analysis was used to compare herbivore richness, diversity and evenness among the regions. Core species groups (monophages, oligophages and polyphages) on the plant were defined and their abundances and host utilization patterns described.

Results  Species richness was greatest in the native range, while species diversity and evenness were similar in the native and expanded range, but significantly greater than in the introduced range of L. draba. Specialist herbivore abundance was greater in the native and expanded compared with the introduced range. Oligophagous Brassicaceae-feeders were equally abundant in all three ranges, and polyphagous herbivore abundance was significantly greater in the introduced range. Overall herbivore abundance was greater in the introduced range. Host utilization was more complete in the two European ranges due to monophagous herbivores that do not exist in the introduced range. Root feeders and gall formers were completely absent from the introduced range, which was dominated by generalist sap-sucking herbivores. However, one indigenous stem-mining weevil, Ceutorhynchus americanus, occurred on L. draba in the introduced range.

Main conclusions  This is, to our knowledge, the first study documenting greater herbivore abundance on an invasive weed in its introduced, compared with its native, range. However, greater abundance does not necessarily translate to greater impact. We argue that, despite the greater total herbivore abundance in the introduced range, differences in the herbivore community structure (specialist vs. generalist herbivory) may contribute to the invasion success of L. draba in the western USA.

Ancillary