Geographical distributions in tropical trees: can geographical range predict performance and habitat association in co-occurring tree species?

Authors

  • Jennifer L. Baltzer,

    Corresponding author
    1. Center for Tropical Forest Science – Arnold Arboretum Asia Program, Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Present address: Biology Department, 63B York Street, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB, E4L 1G7 Canada.

  • Stuart J. Davies,

    1. Center for Tropical Forest Science – Arnold Arboretum Asia Program, Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
    2. Center for Tropical Forest Science, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, PO Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Panama, Republic of Panama
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Nur Supardi Md. Noor,

    1. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong 52109, Selangor, Malaysia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Abdul Rahman Kassim,

    1. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong 52109, Selangor, Malaysia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • James V. LaFrankie

    1. Center for Tropical Forest Science-Arnold Arboretum Asia Program, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore 637617, Singapore
    Search for more papers by this author

*Jennifer L. Baltzer, Biology Department, 63B York Street, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB, E4L 1G7 Canada.
E-mail: jbaltzer@mta.ca

Abstract

Aim  A major floristic and climatic transition from aseasonal to seasonal evergreen tropical forest (the Kangar–Pattani Line; KPL) exists in the Indo-Sundaic region of Southeast Asia. Mechanisms constraining species distribution here are at present poorly understood, but it is hypothesized that species differ in their tolerances of abiotic factors, in particular water availability. Under this hypothesis, we anticipate differences in performance or habitat preferences, or both, of species differing in distribution with respect to the KPL. The aim of this study is to test whether geographical distributions can be used to explain variation in growth, mortality and habitat preferences in co-occurring tree species differing in their distribution in relation to the KPL.

Location  Pasoh Forest Reserve, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia; south of the KPL.

Methods  All tree species within a 50-ha forest dynamics plot were classified as widespread or southern based upon their distributions in relation to the KPL and as habitat specialists or generalists based on spatial association with soil-based habitat categories. Growth and mortality rates, variation in growth and mortality with respect to soil type, and levels of habitat association were quantified for species with different geographical distributions.

Results  Differences existed in species performance based upon geographical distributions. Specifically, widespread species had lower growth rates than did species restricted to the aseasonal forests. Mortality rates did not differ as a function of geographical distribution. The growth responses of species to soil habitats also diverged, such that differences in performance of widespread species among soil types were more conservative than those of species restricted in their distribution to the aseasonal forests. However, the proportion of species showing positive habitat associations did not differ significantly between widespread and southern species.

Main conclusions  Distribution-based differences in species performance and response to soil type support the hypothesis that species tolerant of wider climatic variation perform less well in any given environment due to limitations on plasticity. These performance differences provide quantitative evidence of the role of climatic transitions in determining tree species distributions in relation to the Kangar–Pattani Line in the Indo-Malay region. Such differences in performance have important implications for our understanding of biodiversity gradients and responses of Indo-Sundaic forests to climate change.

Ancillary