Get access
Advertisement

Inclusion of soil data improves the performance of bioclimatic envelope models for insect species distributions in temperate Europe

Authors

  • Nicolas Titeux,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department Environment and Agro-biotechnologies, Public Research Centre – Gabriel Lippmann, Belvaux, Luxembourg
    2. Behavioural Ecology and Conservation Group, Biodiversity Research Centre, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
      *Nicolas Titeux, Department Environment and Agro-biotechnologies, Public Research Centre – Gabriel Lippmann, Rue du Brill 41, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg. E-mail: titeux@lippmann.lu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Dirk Maes,

    1. Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Brussels, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mathieu Marmion,

    1. Department of Geography, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Miska Luoto,

    1. Department of Geography, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Risto K. Heikkinen

    1. Finnish Environment Institute, Research Department, Research Programme for Biodiversity, Helsinki, Finland
    Search for more papers by this author

*Nicolas Titeux, Department Environment and Agro-biotechnologies, Public Research Centre – Gabriel Lippmann, Rue du Brill 41, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg. E-mail: titeux@lippmann.lu

Abstract

Aim  To analyse the effect of the inclusion of soil and land-cover data on the performance of bioclimatic envelope models for the regional-scale prediction of butterfly (Rhopalocera) and grasshopper (Orthoptera) distributions.

Location  Temperate Europe (Belgium).

Methods  Distributional data were extracted from butterfly and grasshopper atlases at a resolution of 5 km for the period 1991–2006 in Belgium. For each group separately, the well-surveyed squares (= 366 for butterflies and = 322 for grasshoppers) were identified using an environmental stratification design and were randomly divided into calibration (70%) and evaluation (30%) datasets. Generalized additive models were applied to the calibration dataset to estimate occurrence probabilities for 63 butterfly and 33 grasshopper species, as a function of: (1) climate, (2) climate and land-cover, (3) climate and soil, and (4) climate, land-cover and soil variables. Models were evaluated as: (1) the amount of explained deviance in the calibration dataset, (2) Akaike’s information criterion, and (3) the number of omission and commission errors in the evaluation dataset.

Results  Information on broad land-cover classes or predominant soil types led to similar improvements in the performance relative to the climate-only models for both taxonomic groups. In addition, the joint inclusion of land-cover and soil variables in the models provided predictions that fitted more closely to the species distributions than the predictions obtained from bioclimatic models incorporating only land-cover or only soil variables. The combined models exhibited higher discrimination ability between the presence and absence of species in the evaluation dataset.

Main conclusions  These results draw attention to the importance of soil data for species distribution models at regional scales of analysis. The combined inclusion of land-cover and soil data in the models makes it possible to identify areas with suitable climatic conditions but unsuitable combinations of vegetation and soil types. While contingent on the species, the results indicate the need to consider soil information in regional-scale species–climate impact models, particularly when predicting future range shifts of species under climate change.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary