Get access

A pain education programme to improve patient satisfaction with cancer pain management: a randomised control trial

Authors

  • Pi-Ling Chou,

    1. Authors: Pi-Ling Chou, MS, RN, Doctoral Student, Graduate Institute of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University; Chia-Chin Lin, PhD, RN, Professor and Director, School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University and Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Chia-Chin Lin

    1. Authors: Pi-Ling Chou, MS, RN, Doctoral Student, Graduate Institute of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University; Chia-Chin Lin, PhD, RN, Professor and Director, School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University and Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    Search for more papers by this author

Chia-Chin Lin, Professor and Director, School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, No.250, Wuxing St., Taipei 11031, Taiwan. Telephone: + 886 2 2377 6229.
E-mail:clin@tmu.edu.tw

Abstract

Aim.  The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of a pain education programme to increase the satisfaction of patients with cancer with regard to pain management and (2) to examine how patient satisfaction with pain management mediates the barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence.

Background.  The patients' satisfaction with pain management is not merely an indicator, it is actually a contributor to medication adherence. However, very few studies investigate methods for improving patient satisfaction with pain management.

Design.  This study used an experimental and longitudinal design.

Methods.  A total of 61 patient–family pairs (n = 122) were randomly assigned to either experimental or control groups. The instruments included the American Pain Society outcome questionnaire, the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form, self-reporting evaluations of analgesic adherence and the Pain Education Booklet. The experimental group (n = 31) participated in a pain education programme, while those in the control group (n = 30) did not. The two groups were compared using generalised estimation equations after the second and fourth weeks. A Sobel test was used to examine the mediating relationships among patient satisfaction with pain management, barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence.

Results.  The experimental group showed a significant improvement in the level of satisfaction they felt for physicians and nurses regarding pain management. For those in the experimental group, satisfaction with pain management was a significant mediator between barriers to using analgesics and analgesic adherence.

Conclusions.  This research provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of a pain education programme for patients and their family members in increasing patient satisfaction with regard to the management of cancer pain.

Relevance to clinical practice.  It is important for health providers to consider patient satisfaction when attempting to improve adherence to pain management regimes in a clinical setting.

Ancillary