SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    MICHELLE WILKERSON-JERDE, ADITI WAGH, URI WILENSKY, Balancing Curricular and Pedagogical Needs in Computational Construction Kits: Lessons From the DeltaTick Project, Science Education, 2015, 99, 3
  2. 2
    Kuei-Pin Chien, Cheng-Yue Tsai, Hsiu-Ling Chen, Wen-Hua Chang, Sufen Chen, Learning differences and eye fixation patterns in virtual and physical science laboratories, Computers & Education, 2015, 82, 191

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Jennifer L. Chiu, Crystal J. DeJaegher, Jie Chao, The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties, Computers & Education, 2015, 85, 59

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    M. Shane Tutwiler, Tina Grotzer, STEM Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2015,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Randy Yerrick, Carl Lund, Yonghee Lee, STEM Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 2015,

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    SUFEN CHEN, WEN-HUA CHANG, CHIH-HUNG LAI, CHENG-YUE TSAI, A Comparison of Students’ Approaches to Inquiry, Conceptual Learning, and Attitudes in Simulation-Based and Microcomputer-Based Laboratories, Science Education, 2014, 98, 5
  7. 7
    Steffie Van Der Steen, Henderien Steenbeek, Marijn Van Dijk, Paul Van Geert, A process approach to children's understanding of scientific concepts: A longitudinal case study, Learning and Individual Differences, 2014, 30, 84

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Anders Kluge, Combining Laboratory Experiments with Digital Tools to Do Scientific Inquiry, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 13, 2157

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    George E. DeBoer, Edys S. Quellmalz, Jodi L. Davenport, Michael J. Timms, Cari F. Herrmann-Abell, Barbara C. Buckley, Kevin A. Jordan, Chun-Wei Huang, Jean C. Flanagan, Comparing three online testing modalities: Using static, active, and interactive online testing modalities to assess middle school students' understanding of fundamental ideas and use of inquiry skills related to ecosystems, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 4
  10. 10
    Emily R. Fyfe, Nicole M. McNeil, Ji Y. Son, Robert L. Goldstone, Concreteness Fading in Mathematics and Science Instruction: a Systematic Review, Educational Psychology Review, 2014, 26, 1, 9

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Cândida Sarabando, José P. Cravino, Armando A. Soares, Contribution of a Computer Simulation to Students’ Learning of the Physics Concepts of Weight and Mass, Procedia Technology, 2014, 13, 112

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Zahira Merchant, Ernest T. Goetz, Lauren Cifuentes, Wendy Keeney-Kennicutt, Trina J. Davis, Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis, Computers & Education, 2014, 70, 29

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Edriss Ahmed Ali, ICT in engineering educational content delivery: Challenges and opportunities, QScience Proceedings, 2014, 2014, 3, 4

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    A.W. Lazonder, S. Ehrenhard, Relative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives for conceptual change in science: how falling objects fall, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2014, 30, 2
  15. 15
    Niwat Srisawasdi, Siriporn Kroothkeaw, Supporting students’ conceptual development of light refraction by simulation-based open inquiry with dual-situated learning model, Journal of Computers in Education, 2014, 1, 1, 49

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    El Hassan El Hassouny, Fatiha Kaddari, Abdelrhani Elachqar, Anouar Alami, Teaching/Learning Mechanics in High School with the Help of Dynamic Software, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 116, 4617

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Ton de Jong, The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits of Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum, Cognition and Instruction, 2014, 32, 2, 101

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Ted M. Clark, Julia M. Chamberlain, Use of a PhET Interactive Simulation in General Chemistry Laboratory: Models of the Hydrogen Atom, Journal of Chemical Education, 2014, 91, 8, 1198

    CrossRef

  19. You have free access to this content19
    Lei Liu, Aaron Rogat, Maria Bertling, A CBAL™ SCIENCE MODEL OF COGNITION: DEVELOPING A COMPETENCY MODEL AND LEARNING PROGRESSIONS TO SUPPORT ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT, ETS Research Report Series, 2013, 2013, 2
  20. 20
    Göran Karlsson, Jonas Ivarsson, Berner Lindström, Agreed discoveries: students’ negotiations in a virtual laboratory experiment, Instructional Science, 2013, 41, 3, 455

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Benjamin U. Sherrett, Erick J. Nefcy, Edith S. Gummer, Milo D. Koretsky, An Expert Solution to Assess an Industrially Situated, Computer-Enabled Design Project, Journal of Engineering Education, 2013, 102, 4
  22. 22
    Bas Kollöffel, Ton Jong, Conceptual Understanding of Electrical Circuits in Secondary Vocational Engineering Education: Combining Traditional Instruction with Inquiry Learning in a Virtual Lab, Journal of Engineering Education, 2013, 102, 3
  23. 23
    Dermot Donnelly, John O’Reilly, Oliver McGarr, Enhancing the Student Experiment Experience: Visible Scientific Inquiry Through a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 4, 1571

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Rafael Pozo-Barajas, María del Pópulo Pablo-Romero, Rafael Caballero, Evaluating a computer-based simulator program to teach the principles of macroeconomic equilibria, Computers & Education, 2013, 69, 71

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Wannisa Matcha, Dayang Rohaya Awang Rambli, Exploratory Study on Collaborative Interaction through the Use of Augmented Reality in Science Learning, Procedia Computer Science, 2013, 25, 144

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Randy Yerrick, Carl Lund, Yonghee Lee, Exploring Simulator Use in the Preparation of Chemical Engineers, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 3, 362

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Georgios Olympiou, Zacharia Zacharias, Ton deJong, Making the invisible visible: enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation, Instructional Science, 2013, 41, 3, 575

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Hsin-Yi Chang, Marcia C. Linn, Scaffolding learning from molecular visualizations, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 7
  29. 29
    Bekele Gashe Dega, Jeanne Kriek, Temesgen Fereja Mogese, Students' conceptual change in electricity and magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2013, 50, 6
  30. 30
    Theodosios Sapounidis, Stavros Demetriadis, Tangible versus graphical user interfaces for robot programming: exploring cross-age children’s preferences, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2013, 17, 8, 1775

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Nilgün Tatar, Ercan Akpınar, Eylem Yıldız Feyzioğlu, The Effect of Computer-Assisted Learning Integrated with Metacognitive Prompts on Students’ Affective Skills, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2013, 22, 5, 764

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Kent J. Crippen, Leanna M. Archambault, Cindy L. Kern, The Nature of Laboratory Learning Experiences in Secondary Science Online, Research in Science Education, 2013, 43, 3, 1029

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Allison S. Liu, Christian D. Schunn, Jesse Flot, Robin Shoop, The role of physicality in rich programming environments, Computer Science Education, 2013, 23, 4, 315

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Robert Garrick, Larry Villasmil, Elizabeth Dell, Rhiannon Hart, Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Classroom Technologies: Classroom Response Systems and Mediated Discourse Technologies, 2013,

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    M. Shane Tutwiler, Tina Grotzer, Approaches and Strategies in Next Generation Science Learning, 2013,

    CrossRef

  36. You have free access to this content36
    Georgios Olympiou, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students' conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation, Science Education, 2012, 96, 1
  37. 37
    Vanessa D. I. Pfeiffer, Katharina Scheiter, Sven Gemballa, Comparing and combining traditional teaching approaches and the use of video clips for learning how to identify species in an aquarium, Journal of Biological Education, 2012, 46, 3, 140

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Audcharaporn Gunhaart, Niwat Srisawasdi, Effect of Integrated Compute-based Laboratory Environment On Students’ Physics Conceptual Learning of Sound Wave Properties, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 46, 5750

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Eleni Loizou, Marios Papaevripidou, Is physicality an important aspect of learning through science experimentation among kindergarten students?, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2012, 27, 3, 447

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Nico Rutten, Wouter R. van Joolingen, Jan T. van der Veen, The learning effects of computer simulations in science education, Computers & Education, 2012, 58, 1, 136

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Kevin Pyatt, Rod Sims, Virtual and Physical Experimentation in Inquiry-Based Science Labs: Attitudes, Performance and Access, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2012, 21, 1, 133

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Brian C. Nelson, Diane Jass Ketelhut, Catherine Schifter, Interdisciplinary Advancements in Gaming, Simulations and Virtual Environments, 2012,

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Tomi Jaakkola, Sami Nurmi, Koen Veermans, A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011, 48, 1
  44. 44
    TRACI SITZMANN, A META-ANALYTIC EXAMINATION OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER-BASED SIMULATION GAMES, Personnel Psychology, 2011, 64, 2
  45. 45
    Gabriel Gorghiu, Adina Elena Glava, Laura Monica Gorghiu, Cătălin Cosmin Glava, Considerations Related to the Added Values Achieved in the VccSSe Comenius 2.1 European Project, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 30, 1137

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Samia Khan, New Pedagogies on Teaching Science with Computer Simulations, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2011, 20, 3, 215

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Georgios Olympiou, Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning, Learning and Instruction, 2011, 21, 3, 317

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Milo Koretsky, Christine Kelly, Edith Gummer, Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories, Journal of Engineering Education, 2011, 100, 3
  49. 49
    Zeynep Koyunlu Ünlü, Ilbilge Dökme, The effect of three different teaching tools in science education on the students’ attitudes towards computer, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 15, 2652

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Mohammad Reza Farrokhnia, Ayoub Esmailpour, A study on the impact of real, virtual and comprehensive experimenting on students’ conceptual understanding of DC electric circuits and their skills in undergraduate electricity laboratory, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, 2, 2, 5474

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Diane Jass Ketelhut, Brian C. Nelson, Designing for real-world scientific inquiry in virtual environments, Educational Research, 2010, 52, 2, 151

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Brian C. Nelson, Diane Jass Ketelhut, Catherine Schifter, Exploring Cognitive Load in Immersive Educational Games, International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 2010, 2, 1, 31

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Constantinos P. Constantinou, Comparing the influence of physical and virtual manipulatives in the context of the Physics by Inquiry curriculum: The case of undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding of heat and temperature, American Journal of Physics, 2008, 76, 4, 425

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    Zacharias C. Zacharia, Georgios Olympiou, Marios Papaevripidou, Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2008, 45, 9
  55. 55
    T. Jaakkola, S. Nurmi, Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2008, 24, 4
  56. 56
    D.A. Muller, J. Bewes, M.D. Sharma, P. Reimann, Saying the wrong thing: improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2008, 24, 2
  57. 57
    W.R. Van Joolingen, T. De Jong, A. Dimitrakopoulou, Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2007, 23, 2