Get access

The impact of collaborative and individualized student response system strategies on learner motivation, metacognition, and knowledge transfer

Authors

  • M.E. Jones,

    1. Intergenerational Computer Center, Oklahoma City University, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • P.D. Antonenko,

    Corresponding author
    1. School of Educational Studies, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA
      Pavlo D. Antonenko, School of Educational Studies, Oklahoma State University, 210 Willard Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA. Email: pasha.antonenko@okstate.edu
    Search for more papers by this author
  • C.M. Greenwood

    1. Department of Entomology, Oklahoma State University, 127 Noble Research Center, Stillwater, OK, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Pavlo D. Antonenko, School of Educational Studies, Oklahoma State University, 210 Willard Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA. Email: pasha.antonenko@okstate.edu

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of collaborative and individualized student response system-based instruction on learner motivation, metacognition, and concept transfer in a large-enrolment undergraduate science course. Participants in the collaborative group responded to conceptual questions, discussed their responses in small groups, and provided a revised response to the question (peer instruction [PI]). A comparison group provided individualized responses (IRs) to the same questions. Results of the motivation measure revealed a drop in confidence for students in both groups. This may be explained by a significant increase in the knowledge of cognition in both IR and PI groups, which likely mediated a recalibration of confidence to a lower, yet more realistic level. A significant interaction was found between gender and student response system strategy relative to the regulation of cognition, revealing that females improved in the PI group, while males reported improvement in the regulation of cognition in the IR group. A custom instrument was developed to measure near and far concept transfer abilities. The PI group scored significantly higher on the test of near transfer than the IR group.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary